u/bishop-122

What’s everyone’s thought on the show this far? I’ve really been enjoying it. My only gripe was last weeks episode was barely an hour long. I neeeed 2+ hours per episode. Outside of that bighomiecc was cool and so was the Epstein call. I would imagine they’ll try calling again at a later date but I’m super excited to see what we get tonight. I also can’t wait to see the more up to date eps of the show once they get caught up and start making them weekly. I would love to see an actual episode being done live like the Night Streams. Now whether we get that or not is anyone’s guess but I feel like YMH can’t grant that liberty because Kurp would start derping too hard😂

Hey! We will have IDF soldiers on the ground in every state if the senate approves

PLEASE CALL YOUR REPS!

SIGN PETITIONS

https://actionnetwork.org/petitions/strike-military-collaboration-with-israel-from-this-years-defense-bill?fbclid=PAdGRleASQp5tleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZA8xMjQwMjQ1NzQyODc0MTQAAafvc-dL-thdleiigwQAXbFJ\_8yJKVE5d90FXVmuigjWlNvSEtn96LaWUjS7KA\_aem\_6KVRXZZGwYi1ZDXVd1YUUw

https://adc.org/action-alert/reject-israel-military-integration/?fbclid=PAdGRleASQp7JleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZA8xMjQwMjQ1NzQyODc0MTQAAafpH3p\_H8FZJiK1G8zsFRfINsucyoe\_-Vi2llXNr1I\_3HsZnnPx2T1a78yGMQ\_aem\_BXW2Tai5HosRmtO54xBpJg

Native American Zuni Elder Clifford Mahooty shares knowledge about God, Creation, and the UFO Phenomena

This clip comes from Graham Hancock’s conversation with neuroscientist and DMT researcher Dr. Andrew Gallimore.

The discussion is about DMT, ayahuasca, indigenous knowledge systems, and whether some “alien” or non-human encounters may involve normally unseen intelligences rather than only hallucinations.

Hancock frames the central idea very clearly.

Among some Amazonian traditions, the ayahuasca vine is not treated as just a plant or a drug. It is often understood as a guiding or controlling spirit. Hancock suggests that the vine may somehow use the DMT-containing leaves as a way to access human consciousness.

He then connects this to what he calls one of the major ideas in Gallimore’s book Death by Astonishment: that humanity may have been in an interactive relationship, often unknowingly, with a vast alien intelligence for thousands of years.

Gallimore’s response is careful but provocative.

He says indigenous groups have taken these intelligences seriously for hundreds or thousands of years. He references the Asháninka and the Maninkari beings, described as beings that are seen as members of the tribe and treated as real as any other individual in their social world.

According to Gallimore, the key point is that these beings are not merely “mythology” in the way modern outsiders often assume.

For these communities, they are beings that can be interacted with, but access requires certain tools.

Gallimore describes ayahuasca as one of those tools.

His strongest line is:

“Ayahuasca is not just a drug.”

He calls it a “plant-based pharmacological technology” developed to interact with these beings.

That wording is important.

He is not simply saying that people get intoxicated and imagine entities. He is suggesting that some indigenous cultures may have developed a repeatable biochemical technology for entering into contact with ordinarily unseen forms of intelligence.

Gallimore says anthropologists often call these beings “spirits,” but he argues that terminology may not matter as much as the underlying claim: there appears to be some kind of normally unseen discarnate intelligence.

In modern language, he says we might call this a “non-human discarnate intelligence.”

He also says that, from our perspective, this is very much “alien,” and that with DMT he does not think it is a misuse of language to refer to these encounters as alien.

The conversation then turns to the Yanomami and their descriptions of hekurã beings: lively, multitudinous, giggling beings central to their worldview. Gallimore and Hancock note that these descriptions sound very similar to what Terence McKenna famously called “machine elves.”

Gallimore pushes back against the idea that people only report elves because McKenna popularized the phrase. His point is that similar beings have been described by indigenous groups for centuries, possibly millennia, long before modern psychedelic culture.

This is the most interesting part of the discussion.

It raises a serious question:

Are DMT entities just internal hallucinations produced by the brain, or are they culturally filtered encounters with something that humans have been interacting with for a very long time?

To be clear, this is not proof that DMT entities are objectively real, extraterrestrial, or independent intelligences.

DMT is a powerful psychedelic, and experiences under its influence can be shaped by neurochemistry, memory, culture, expectation, and symbolic imagination.

But Gallimore’s argument is worth discussing because it challenges a very modern assumption: that indigenous entity encounters must be “just mythology,” while modern scientific language gets to define what is real.

Maybe the better question is not whether these beings are “aliens” in the spaceship sense.

Maybe the question is whether non-human intelligence can appear through altered states, plant technologies, and forms of consciousness that modern materialist science still does not fully understand.

What do you think: are DMT entities purely brain-generated hallucinations, or could ayahuasca and DMT be tools for interacting with normally unseen forms of intelligence?

Click below to access the source and related material:

1. Full YouTube conversation — Graham Hancock with Dr. Andrew Gallimore
2. Atlas of Mystery on X / Clip

Rep. Eric Burlison BOMBSHELL: "There is an egg shaped UFO craft in our possession"
"People lose time when they go inside this craft"
"I want to go inside the craft & see for myself"

This is an old but fascinating exchange between Harvard psychiatrist Dr. John E. Mack and philosopher Terence McKenna about the UFO abduction phenomenon.

Mack’s interpretation is not the usual “aliens from another planet” argument.

Instead, he suggests that the phenomenon may be communicating through the only language modern Western culture still takes seriously: the physical world.

Mack says that if we think of the Divine, the Great Spirit, the Holy Spirit, the Anima Mundi, or the world of spirit, modern humanity has largely lost contact with it. According to him, when spiritual reality signals us, most people no longer listen.

So, in his view, the phenomenon appears in physical form because that is the only language the modern materialist mind understands.

He points to physical details often reported in abduction cases:

– cuts

– scars

– scoop marks

– reproductive procedures

– implants

– burned earth where UFOs allegedly land

– consistent experiences across different witnesses

– photographs and physical traces associated with UFO sightings

Mack’s point is not simply that these prove extraterrestrials in a conventional sense.

His point is stranger: something that may belong to the world of spirit is “showing up” in the physical world.

That is what he thinks makes the phenomenon so disruptive.

He also connects the abduction phenomenon to ecology.

Mack says many abductees receive intense messages about environmental destruction: dying forests, polluted water systems, visions of planetary collapse, and a sense that the Earth itself is in danger. He emphasizes that many of these people were not environmental activists before their experiences, but afterward became deeply concerned about the planet.

He then makes another difficult comparison.

Abductees often describe being taken against their will, tagged with implants, examined, terrified, and treated as if they have no control. Mack argues that this forces humans to experience something similar to how we treat animals: as beings to be captured, studied, used, tagged, and controlled.

In other words, the phenomenon may be showing us our own behavior from the other side.

That is one of the strongest parts of the clip.

Mack suggests that because humans now identify so strongly with the body, the phenomenon reaches people through the body. It is not merely intellectual information. The experience is embodied, physical, emotional, and often traumatic.

Then Mack makes his most important philosophical point.

He says the Western mind can tolerate spirit if it remains in mythology, religion, poetry, imagination, or psychology. But what it cannot tolerate is something “spiritual” crossing the boundary and appearing in the physical world.

That, for Mack, is the real shock.

The UFO abduction phenomenon violates the boundary between spirit and matter.

It brings something that “should” belong to the invisible world into the visible world.

And that is why, in his words, it has the power to shatter the belief structure of the Western materialist mind.

To be clear, this is not proof that abductions are literally extraterrestrial events, spiritual events, or physical events in the ordinary sense.

But Mack’s framework is valuable because it refuses to reduce the phenomenon to only one category.

It may be physical.

It may be psychological.

It may be spiritual.

It may be ecological.

It may be symbolic.

Or it may be something that exposes the weakness of those categories themselves.

What do you think: is Mack giving us a deeper way to understand the abduction phenomenon, or is this an attempt to spiritualize something that still needs harder evidence?

Click below to access the source and related material:

1. Atlas of Mystery on X
2. Terence McKenna interviews John E. Mack on the alien abduction phenomenon (Prague, 1992)

This is a new clip related to the Varginha case, often called the “Brazilian Roswell.”

The man speaking is Dr. Ítalo Daniele Venturele, who says he has been a physician for 46 years.

In the video, he gives his name and swears that what he is about to say is true.

According to Venturele, on January 20, 1996, he was called to see a patient. But when he arrived, he says the “patient” was not a being from our planet.

He says he was asked to give a medical opinion on the case and describes what he saw from a medical point of view.

His description is striking:

– conscious

– no pain

– no bleeding

– breathing normally

– very calm

– very quiet

– looked like a child around seven years old

– white/pale

– no bad smell

– large head shaped like a drop

– very small mouth

– eyes described as lilac/purple rather than red

– one hand inside a field/covered area and one hand outside

He says the being looked at him calmly and was not agitated, aggressive, in pain, or afraid.

One of the most interesting parts is how he describes the eyes.

He says the being looked at him twice, then looked toward the window, then looked back at him again. Venturele says the look was “beautiful,” without judgment, and gave him the impression that the being understood what was happening.

He also says the intelligence behind the gaze seemed greater than human intelligence.

Venturele says he stood about a meter and a half away and did not touch the being.

He emphasizes that he did not go looking for this. He says he was called there by chance to see a patient, and that is when he saw it.

His strongest statement is simple:

“I am an eyewitness. I saw the being.”

He also says people can mock him, joke about it, or say whatever they want, but he saw the being lying in front of him.

He frames the issue as something bigger than money or fame. In his words, this is something that changes humanity’s concept of itself: a being from somewhere else.

Important caveat: this is testimony, not physical proof.

The Varginha case has many claims involving witnesses, military activity, alleged biological beings, hospital involvement, and later secrecy. But this clip by itself does not prove the event happened. It is one man’s public testimony, and it should be evaluated as such.

That said, the reason this matters is that medical testimony has always been one of the most important missing pieces in the Varginha case. If a doctor is willing to go on camera, give his name, swear to the account, and describe the being in clinical terms, it deserves attention.

The key questions now are:

Who exactly called him?

Where did the examination take place?

Were other doctors, nurses, military personnel, or hospital staff present?

Was there any written medical record, internal report, or hospital log?

Why is he speaking now?

And are there other medical witnesses from Varginha willing to come forward publicly?

What do you think: is this one of the more important Varginha testimonies, or does it still need stronger corroboration before it can change the case?

This clip comes from an American Alchemy interview with Jesse Michels and cognitive scientist Donald Hoffman.

Hoffman is known for his work on perception, consciousness, and the idea that what we experience as physical reality may function more like a user interface than reality as it actually is.

In this clip, Hoffman discusses what he calls “Recursive Trace Logic,” a mathematical framework he connects to consciousness, observation, and the possibility that spacetime and physical embodiment may not be fundamental.

The most interesting claim is this:

“Embodiment is the exception, not the rule.”

From Hoffman’s perspective, advanced intelligence in the universe may not usually be biological, body-based, or physical in the way humans assume. Instead, he suggests that most possible conscious systems may be disembodied, adaptive, and far more complex than our human sensory interface allows us to perceive.

He also compares human perception to a kind of virtual reality headset.

In that analogy, our body and sensory system are not direct access to reality itself. They are more like an interface, a limited headset that gives us a narrow version of reality useful for survival.

And according to Hoffman, our particular “headset” may be one of the cheapest and most restrictive possible.

That is a provocative idea for the UFO/NHI discussion.

Most public debate still assumes that if non-human intelligence exists, it must be something like:

– biological beings

– physical craft

– pilots inside vehicles

– civilizations on planets

– bodies moving through space

But if consciousness is more fundamental than physical embodiment, then NHI could be much stranger:

– disembodied intelligence

– non-local consciousness

– adaptive information systems

– intelligences interacting through perception

– entities using temporary “interfaces” rather than fixed bodies

– forms of life that do not fit biological assumptions

This might also connect to why the phenomenon often appears inconsistent: physical craft in some cases, lights or orbs in others, telepathic contact, dreamlike encounters, religious interpretations, altered states, and experiences that seem partly physical and partly psychological.

To be clear, this is not proof of anything. It is a theoretical framework, and it should be treated as speculation unless the mathematics produces testable predictions and those predictions are independently examined.

But I think it raises a useful question:

Are we making the UFO/NHI problem too narrow by assuming advanced intelligence must look like embodied life as we know it?

What if the most advanced intelligences in the universe are not “aliens in bodies,” but consciousness systems using physical embodiment only when necessary?

Apparently, Ghislaine was dressed up at a event that benefitted the NSPCC and the Order of Malta. The event also had Tom Ford, Hugh Grant, Valentino, Sir Michael Caine, Jerry Hall and many others.

She and Epstein also knew a very well known Knights of Malta member, John Roberts, was even having fun at Epstein Island, although the photo by some has has been corrected as it being John Luc Brunel, his name does appear on the flight list. Would love for someone to correct me if I'm wrong.

EDIT:John Roberts is a common name and that photo may have been confirmed to be someone else.

Lastly, and the weirdest one was that Ghislaine was dating some man named Gianfranco Cicogna Mozzoni, another member of the Order of Malta. They had a difficult breakup and during 2012, he died in a plane crash. Apparently, it's said that he moulded her into the monster we see today.

There's more weird ties in this substack, but you can see there was some bizarre connections. Looks like he liked to overthrow governments as well. I recommend reading it, has lot's of good information.

Think about the numbers for a second, because Ukraine is a deeply traditional country where roughly eighty percent of the population identifies as Christian, yet in 2019, they suddenly gave a massive seventy three percent of the vote to Volodymyr Zelensky, a secular comedic actor from a Jewish background who had absolutely zero political experience,

A traditional majority Christian nation does not just organically pivot overnight like that, and it only makes sense when you look at how the entire thing was engineered.

For four years before the election, Zelensky starred in a hit show called Servant of the People, where he played a normal teacher who accidentally becomes president, This was total psychological conditioning, and the public did not vote for a real politician, They voted for a fictional character that media companies had trained them to love,

He was not a grassroots hero either, His entire career and campaign were backed by Ihor Kolomoyskyi, a billionaire oligarch who owned the television network, Zelensky was simply the perfect weapon used by the elite to oust the previous president and take control of the state.

Now, we are seeing the exact same blueprint being prepared in the Middle East, where the deep state is trying to turn Iran into a new Ukraine, using it as a proxy war battlefield where China is the ultimate target to bleed their economy and disrupt their global energy supply...

Finally, putting a cultural outsider in charge was a deliberate move to sever the deep historical and religious ties of the country, replacing its traditional identity with a globalist and Western facing corporate state, The mainstream media calls it a democratic miracle, but the script was written years before the ballots were ever cast...