Image 1 — Why are Reddit moderators making it so difficult for patients to share negative experiences with plastic surgeons?
Image 2 — Why are Reddit moderators making it so difficult for patients to share negative experiences with plastic surgeons?
Image 3 — Why are Reddit moderators making it so difficult for patients to share negative experiences with plastic surgeons?
Image 4 — Why are Reddit moderators making it so difficult for patients to share negative experiences with plastic surgeons?
Image 5 — Why are Reddit moderators making it so difficult for patients to share negative experiences with plastic surgeons?
Image 6 — Why are Reddit moderators making it so difficult for patients to share negative experiences with plastic surgeons?

Why are Reddit moderators making it so difficult for patients to share negative experiences with plastic surgeons?

I’ve had two really frustrating experiences with Reddit moderators recently, and I’m wondering if anyone else has dealt with something similar.

I had a traumatic experience during plastic surgery earlier this year and have been trying to share what happened and get advice, including recommendations for medical malpractice attorneys.

First, I posted in r/plasticsurgery. The moderator removed my post and initially gave me different explanations for why. First, he said it was because I hadn’t provided enough evidence, and then he described my post as a “mental health rant” and told me not to discuss mental health. When I asked which rule I had actually violated, he eventually said it was because of the lack of evidence.

I explained that I had documentation supporting my experience and offered to send it to him privately, but he insisted that I had to post it publicly. So I did, because he told me it was a requirement.

Afterward, I realized that some of the screenshots contained sensitive personal and medical information about me, even though my name wasn’t included. I became concerned about having that information publicly available, especially because I’m considering legal action.

I removed the information and asked whether I could repost my experience without the documentation. Instead, he told me I’d already had my chance and that I was now banned from posting in the community.

What really bothered me was that he kept saying things like “no more exceptions will be made,” as if I was asking for some kind of special treatment. I wasn’t asking for an exception. I was asking why I had to publicly share sensitive medical records and private emails just to talk about my own experience. I only posted that information because he told me it was required, and once I realized it could affect my privacy and potential legal case, I wanted to remove it. I don’t understand why that was treated like I’d done something wrong.

The entire interaction felt really dismissive and rude. He repeatedly characterized my experience as a mental health issue rather than addressing what I was actually trying to discuss. I’ll attach screenshots of the conversation so people can see how it was handled.

Then I tried posting about my experience in another subreddit. That post was also removed. When I asked why, the moderators accused me of doxxing the surgeon because I had mentioned his name.

I was confused because I thought doxxing meant exposing someone’s private identifying information, not discussing your own medical experience with a doctor whose professional name is already publicly available. I had checked the community’s rules and hadn’t seen anything specifically prohibiting naming doctors.

Also, I don’t think the screenshots show this, but the plastic surgery moderator banned me after my last response to him. And now I’ve been muted for 28 days by the moderators of r/self just for asking why my post was removed. It’s honestly ridiculous that I can’t even ask questions about their decisions without being shut down.

For some context, I paid approximately $21,000 to go to a highly regarded plastic surgeon because I thought I could trust that I’d be in good hands. Instead, I was kept awake during surgery after repeatedly telling them I wanted to be fully asleep. The experience was extremely traumatic and has seriously affected my mental health.

The surgeon has been dismissive of my concerns from the beginning, and the way his office has handled everything afterward has made things even worse. We requested a refund, and after a lot of back and forth, the only amount they were willing to offer was $1,000. I never received that money, and we eventually told them we were no longer interested in accepting it.

Now that I’m trying to share my experience publicly, his office is pressuring me to take down my reviews and videos. They actually emailed me acknowledging that they’d seen my posts and told me I had until 4 p.m. that day to remove them or they wouldn’t continue discussing a refund. The way they’ve handled this has been disgusting.

So I know the surgeon’s office is aware of what I’m sharing, and given everything that’s happened, I can’t help wondering whether they’re also mass reporting my posts to get them removed. I’ve noticed unusual negative engagement and downvoting as well, although I don’t know who’s responsible.

People deserve to know about experiences like mine, especially when they’re choosing a surgeon and trusting that person with their body. I should be allowed to talk about what happened to me without being pressured into silence.

And what I really don’t understand is why the Reddit moderators are making this so difficult too. I’ve had nothing but problems trying to share my experience. One moderator demanded that I publicly post sensitive personal evidence and then banned me when I wanted to repost without it. The other accused me of doxxing simply for naming the surgeon.

Are these actually legitimate reasons to remove my posts under Reddit’s rules? Because from what I’ve seen, these decisions seem completely unfair. I don’t understand why it feels like the moderators are more concerned about protecting the surgeon than allowing patients to speak about their experiences.

Has anyone else experienced something similar with Reddit moderators, particularly when discussing negative experiences with doctors or surgeons?

u/NiceMuffin7735 — 4 days ago

Is it normal for a seafood market to not know where it’s live seafood comes from?

I was at H Mart on Balboa Ave in San Diego today looking at their live seafood tanks. They had live fish, shrimp, Dungeness crab, abalone, lobster, etc.
I asked an employee where the live seafood was sourced from because I wanted to know whether it was wild-caught or farm-raised and whether it came from California, elsewhere in the U.S., or was imported. They went into the back to check and came back saying they couldn't find any information about where it was from.
That surprised me because I assumed a grocery store selling seafood would have supplier/origin information somewhere, even if it wasn't displayed directly on the tank.
Does anyone who works in seafood, grocery distribution, or restaurants know how this normally works? Is it plausible that the store genuinely wouldn't have access to the country/ state of origin, or did the employee probably just not know where to find it?

reddit.com
u/NiceMuffin7735 — 1 month ago

What happened to the approved Wrigleyville Commons development, and how active are the developer and SCGroup today?

I’ve been looking through some older Chicago real-estate records and am curious if anyone familiar with Lakeview development or commercial real estate knows what ultimately happened with Wrigleyville Commons, the proposed development at 1225–1235 W. School St. and 1240 W. Melrose St.
Chicago’s zoning records show that the proposal involved 28 townhomes, with US Investments–Residential LLC as the applicant/developer entity. The city’s development documents identify John L. Pellouchoud as the developer contact and use an SCGroup Real Estate email address for him.
The development received zoning approval around 2019–2020. Contemporary reporting identified Pellouchoud and Boghos Angel Sarkissian as the developers and reported that they were under contract to acquire the former industrial property.
The architectural plans were fairly substantial: 28 four-bedroom townhomes, a below-grade parking garage and a landscaped esplanade.
But the project apparently never happened as originally approved. Chicago Cityscape now categorizes Wrigleyville Commons as an “abandoned proposal.”
So my first question is simply: Does anyone know what happened between the project’s approval and its abandonment?
Financing? Sale of the property? Change of developer? COVID? Something else?
I’m also curious about US Investments–Residential LLC itself. Does anyone familiar with Chicago development records know whether that entity remained active after Wrigleyville Commons, was created primarily for this development, or was involved in other projects?
Finally, I’m curious about SCGroup Real Estate, where Pellouchoud is still currently identified as Managing Principal.
SCGroup’s current website is active and describes itself as a boutique commercial real-estate firm serving Chicago-area middle-market businesses and investors. It also appears to have current brokerage activity; there are 2026 commercial listings being marketed by SCGroup.
What I find confusing is the company’s physical office history.
An older CTA document from 2014 shows an SCGroup employee using 150 N. Michigan Ave., Suite 800. Current commercial-real-estate databases such as LoopNet instead list SCGroup at 27 N. Green St. Meanwhile, SCGroup’s own current staff page lists John Pellouchoud as Managing Principal but leaves the “Office” field blank for him and several other employees.
None of that necessarily means anything unusual—small commercial-real-estate firms move, work remotely and change offices all the time. I’m just trying to understand what SCGroup’s current operating footprint actually looks like.
So basically I’m trying to answer three questions:
What happened to Wrigleyville Commons after it received approval?
What became of US Investments–Residential LLC, and did it pursue other developments?
How active is SCGroup Real Estate today, and where is the firm actually based?
I’m mainly looking for public records or information from people familiar with Chicago real estate/development rather than speculation.
Sources:
Chicago zoning records — Residential Planned Development 1463:
https://gisapps.chicago.gov/gisimages/zoning_pds/PD1463.pdf
Wrigleyville Commons project page — a+c architects:
https://www.acarchitects.net/wrigleyvillecommons
Chicago Cityscape — Wrigleyville Commons:
https://www.chicagocityscape.com/document/629
SCGroup Real Estate — John L. Pellouchoud:
https://www.scgroupre.com/people/john-l-pellouchoud
SCGroup Real Estate — current staff:
https://www.scgroupre.com/people
LoopNet — SCGroup:
https://www.loopnet.com/company/scgroup-real-estate/chicago-il/812q610l/2/

reddit.com
u/NiceMuffin7735 — 1 month ago

Does anyone else find @anelenee spiritual-teacher content really confusing on TikTok?

I’ve been watching this TikTok creator who presents herself as very spiritual and promotes paid spiritual classes/offerings, and I’m genuinely confused by a lot of what she says. It often sounds profound on the surface, but when I try to figure out what it actually means, I’m left with more questions than answers.

Recently she was discussing the idea of “forgiving the world for all your errors.” I genuinely didn’t understand what that meant, so I asked her to explain it. I also asked what she does in practice that tangibly helps people, because she presents herself as someone who can teach/guide others.

Instead of answering, she asked whether I had read A Course in Miracles. I clarified that I hadn’t and that this was exactly why I was asking her to explain the concept in her own words. She still didn’t explain it. Instead, she said my questions felt like an attack, said she didn’t need to prove herself, and ended by saying, “Being myself is the gift.”

I’ll include the screenshots because I think the exchange speaks for itself.

Then, shortly afterward, she posted another video smiling and talking about how people may try to “challenge you” or “tear you down,” how this is nothing new, and how you should let the noise be noise, take some breaths, return to your inner wisdom, faith and knowing, etc. She never came back and answered my question.

I obviously can’t know whether that video was specifically about my comments unless she says so, but the timing made me wonder.

And that’s really my issue with this type of content. If you’re charging people for spiritual teaching, shouldn’t you be able to explain the concepts you’re presenting when someone asks a straightforward question? Why is asking “what does this actually mean?” treated as hostility rather than an opportunity to teach?

I’m not saying someone has to agree with me about her. I’m genuinely curious whether other people understand what she’s trying to communicate and whether anyone who’s followed her longer can explain what the substance of these teachings actually is.

reddit.com
u/NiceMuffin7735 — 1 month ago