Are there ANY local Vegas politicians speaking about about the Flock camera situation?
Look I get it, we have a problem with unregistered vehicles. It's dangerous & raises insurance rates for everyone. Enforcement is loosey-goosey except for that task force thing they did awhile back to get the heat off.
But make no mistake - cars without plates is **NOT AT ALL** why these cameras were installed, & obviously aren't helping much in that regard. They aren't just innocuous License Plate Readers.
These cameras were installed to literally spy on ALL of us as citizens (including children) in EVERY way possible, make a playbook on every individual, & to aggregate that data & sell it to anyone willing to pay.
Horowitz family funding the whole thing to skirt the opportunity for public comment is a red flag if I ever saw one.
This is too far past facial recognition in casinos or public venues. This is a concerted effort to record your every move, & accelerate the agenda of the surveillance state. This has nothing to do with public safety - this is just privacy invasion in it's purest form.
So if not about cars? What is it about?
Induced compliance & censorship. Protest mitigation. An avenue to label those who disagree as terrorists & disappear them. Y'all remember Snowden, Prism, Covid, no need to recap.
"I've got nothing to hide." Bullshit. PM me your address so I can put a camera in your backyard. Not comfortable with that? Why?
I know there are some .org's trying to sound the alarm. But are there ANY local politicians running with this issue???
**TLDR:** gtfo, flock. You don't belong here. Pretty sure this is near-universal opinion outside of bot farms. Is there ANYONE in local gov't willing to BANG THE TABLE on this issue? 'Cause I'd really like to support that person.
Links:
deflock.org
aclunv.org/
opengridworks.com - other interesting stuff near you. Lots to play around with here, shows data centers & other stuff in your neighborhood. Lotta data to load up, so be patient with this site.
>The former [LV] Metro officer said his major concern was not the technology itself, but the fact that there was little transparency on how the technology was being used or what the department's policy was on Flock usage.
>"If you look around the country where license plate readers are being used, there's some kind of public meeting, there's some kind of public process," the officer said. "What's happening here is on a very large scale — they're putting out surveillance technology — and there's no public disclosure."
>easily access private license plate information alongside other personal data, such as Social Security numbers, credit scores, property and occupancy information, as well as emails and social media handles.