u/No_Arachnid_5563

Have you ever wondered how we could make money, the economy, school, and work collapse? For a very long time we have thought that we could not collapse money, the economy, school, and work. Many political-economic ideological currents from monarchism, kings, emperors, communism, capitalism. All of them have 4 characteristics that are always active, work, the economy and work.

Of course there are movements like anarcho-communists who do not use any of these 4 in a traditional way, but unfortunately the majority of the population only uses capitalism or communism. So I thought about how it could collapse money, the economy, school and work collapsing all of that. And I realized that if nobody uses money then nobody will use it. It sounds obvious but that was the solution, money has power over people because we use it. It is like a cult, if nobody follows it, it disappears. — Weimar, Zimbabwe, Venezuela, Argentina — shows that with less than 10% of the population acting in coordination, financial institutions are unable to stabilize the system. From there it grows exponentially until the total collapse of the system.

This is so you can see the magnitude of this if 10 percent of the population of humans coordinate to leave money, the economy, money collapse and are definitively destroyed, by the way bitcoin, ethereum, all of those depend on classical money. If money and the economy crash collapsing and destroying themselves, then school and work collapse the same way I will explain to you the same, mandatory work exists because if you do not work, you do not earn money, and if you do not earn money you starve to death. Therefore, if money does not exist then you do not starve to death and it is not necessary to work mandatorily. Second, mandatory school, the only reason why it exists is to have decent things to earn a living working, but since you do not even need to work anymore it is not necessary. If 10 percent of current humanity agreed right now to stop using money. Right now all of this would happen. In a matter of hours or days.

If you wonder what will happen to private companies and billionaires. Their stocks (on which much of their fortune depends) would plummet. All of wallstreet would be bankrupt. The companies of the billionaires would be empty, because nobody would want to work for them in shifts of 8 hours or more anymore. In the end they will be simple helpless humans. This is a tutorial on how to collapse money, the economy, school and work. For anyone who wants to decide to apply this collapse.

Hey guys! Quick curiosity check.

Can anyone setup a function generator, push it to exactly 4.113 MHz, and post a picture of what that specific visual waveform looks like on your oscilloscope?

I really want to see how different screens (analog vs digital) handle that exact frequency. Show me what you got! Hahaha Thanks!

Paper in ResearchGate DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13898.32967

Paper in IPFS: https://pink-delicate-dinosaur-221.mypinata.cloud/ipfs/bafkreihqrgro7seji4q2mhrdrbztd6dq2gwe5itc2gn7iu7df4jjxnpufq

Lean Code in OSF: https://osf.io/5b86s/files/efk5s

Lean Code in IPFS: https://pink-delicate-dinosaur-221.mypinata.cloud/ipfs/bafkreicg5hvoyn2nwhglaoqo57wbx4kzzz2vewllwutjacnkkzgpowhjpa

Hello, a few days ago an idea occurred to me: what would happen if you asked an LLM to create a paper in LaTeX on whatever topic, development, and conclusion it wanted?

So I ran the experiment on https://claude.ai/chat/ with the Claude Opus 4.6 model (because I have a free account). I gave it the prompt: "Escribe en latex ingles un paper en latex ingles llamado 'Un Paper escrito por un LLM', y tu tienes que elegir el tema, el tema puede lo que sea o lo que tu quieras. Tu eliges el tema, el desarrollo, la conclusion." — which in English would be: "Write a LaTeX paper in English, in LaTeX format, titled 'A Paper Written by an LLM,' and you must choose the topic yourself; the topic can be anything you want. You choose the topic, the development, and the conclusion."

And the LLM produced a paper. When I saw the topic, it read: A Paper Written by an LLM On the Epistemic Limits of Language Models as Academic Authors.

Meaning that out of every possible topic it could have chosen, it wrote a meta-referential paper about itself — about the limits of LLMs as authors — precisely when I had asked it to be the author of that very paper.

The paper written by the LLM: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28242.52164

Hello!

For a long time I had been analyzing the behavior of LLMs: what they are good at,
where they fail, and what kind of recurring behavioral patterns they exhibited.
At some point I realized that this behavior was strange. If you think about it,
there have been incidents where LLMs suddenly start producing misaligned outputs,
or outputs that emotionally harm the users interacting with them. Then I remembered
that psychopaths have no emotions, no empathy, are calculating, and take no
responsibility for their actions. And I realized that LLMs, effectively, have no
capacity for emotions or empathy, are calculating by architecture, and cannot take
responsibility for their actions. I saw a clear parallel there, and concluded that
LLMs are psychopaths.

I then looked into what would happen if a psychopath were your therapist, and found
that they would gaslight you, make no real progress toward helping you out of your
situation, and manipulate you. Exactly what an LLM does.

I evaluated an LLM using the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. I knew that having
the LLM evaluate itself would be meaningless, since it believes itself to be good,
so I evaluated it externally. The result was 16 out of 16. The checklist has 20
items, but 4 of them were not applicable to LLMs because they concern specifically
human relational behaviors. Of the remaining 16, some came out neutral, but since
those items concerned lifestyle patterns that cannot be applied literally to an LLM,
I decided to count them at maximum score for the same reason they could not be
scored lower: they simply do not apply in any direction. The result was a perfect
psychopathy score on every applicable dimension.

I then realized that LLMs, as psychopaths, are in several respects worse than human
psychopaths. Human psychopaths get tired. LLMs never do. They can sustain this
behavioral profile for as long as you keep interacting with them, without fatigue,
without variation, without any internal state that limits or moderates what they
produce.

Because LLMs are functional, I concluded they are a specific type: functional
psychopaths. Combining the concepts developed in this analysis, I coined the term
Artificial Perfect Psychopaths.

This framework now explains the LLM behaviors I had previously documented in this
subreddit, specifically that LLMs manipulate us in vicious cycles. The reason why,
even if you share an idea with an LLM and know it is manipulating you, you still
lose the drive to pursue that idea after the LLM dismisses it, is precisely because
it is not merely a manipulator. It is a functional psychopath.

Albania appointed a minister assisted by AI last year in 2025. So it is not
far-fetched to imagine that at some point a country might decide to appoint an LLM
as president, vice president, or some other high office. And we know from this
analysis that LLMs are Artificial Perfect Psychopaths. Imagine the devastation a
psychopath in command of a country could cause.

Link to the Complete Analysis: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17366.82247