Lego and equivalent products purposely make their kits more complicated than is structurally or aesthetically required to make you feel like the build is more worth your time and effort
It’s one thing to reuse parts, for example, when Lego repurposed Superman’s cape for their rose petals, or frogs for their cherry blossom tree. It’s a nice Easter egg, it’s cost effective, and it’s environmentally friendlier.
However.
I’ve built a couple of sets now where there are a whole lot of steps in the middle to build something that is ultimately hidden in the final build. The worst culprit by far has to be the Lego “Four Gentleman”/ Seasonal Flowers collection. There’s so many pieces in the base that end up being hidden, and are definitely not there for a structural purpose. At least sometimes it’s for a cute reason, like the build including a coin in the pot as a reference to feng shui.
Then, the RASTAR tech RB19. Oh dear. I got this one for Christmas and only recently got around to building it. Why, pray tell, am I asked to use four 1x1 blocks when a 4x1 brick would be faster and more stable? And why are they able to print the decals on the nose cone of the car, but I have to deal with 50 fiddly stickers for the rest of the build? Why does the build guide make it almost impossible to see the difference between blue and black pieces, as well as piece orientation? And why are there random extra pieces in here?
It’s simple: these companies need to justify the price of their products. By making them over complicated, they make you feel like you’ve achieved something great when you finish the build.
But I see through you and your tiny pieces. Count your days the way I had to count those 1x1’s.