The other woman should be held accountable for her actions. When she knowingly participates in an affair, she is complicit in the betrayal and the damage it causes.
Yes, the mistress—the other woman—should be held accountable for her actions. Yes, it’s true that she didn’t make vows to the wife. But that doesn’t mean she has no responsibility for knowingly participating in deception, manipulating the husband, or actively contributing to the breakdown of someone else’s marriage.
I don’t understand why people are so quick to defend the other woman and put her on a pedestal. Why is she treated like a five-year-old child who can't be held responsible for her own actions?
Do people not understand that when you’re married, your first instinct can be to protect your relationship from outsiders who may be trying to interfere with it? It can be difficult to immediately hold your spouse accountable because you love them. You trust them. At first, you may genuinely struggle to believe that the person you built your life with would intentionally hurt you.
So your human instinct may be to look outward—to the person who knowingly entered the situation and had no place in your marriage to begin with. A foreign body.
And yes, the other woman can absolutely become an active participant in undermining the wife. She can study the relationship. She can learn about the wife's vulnerabilities through mutual friends—or even position herself as a friend. She can take a private disagreement between husband and wife and magnify it. She can take a legitimate flaw, frustration, or difficult period in the marriage and repeatedly reinterpret it until the husband begins seeing his wife through an entirely different lens.
And how does it start?
“I'm just being a shoulder to cry on.”
“I'm just checking in.”
“I'm just listening.”
“I'm only giving him advice.”
“Why don't you tell me what's really going on with your wife? Talk to me about her.”
“Let's grab a drink/lunch and talk.”
One conversation becomes another. Private information becomes ammunition. A complaint becomes a narrative. A vulnerability becomes an opening.
And eventually, the person who was supposedly “just a friend” knows exactly where the marriage is weakest. These deceiving women deliberately cultivate emotional intimacy because they see an opening and intend to exploit it. And that's the part I think gets overlooked when everyone says, “The husband is the only one responsible.”
Of course the husband is responsible for his choices. He made the vows. He chose to lie. He chose to betray his wife. But acknowledging his responsibility doesn't require us to pretend the other person's behavior is irrelevant.
If someone knowingly inserts themselves into a marriage, gathers private information, exploits vulnerabilities, encourages resentment, and participates in deception, that behavior deserves accountability too.
Holding the husband accountable does not require giving the mistress a free pass. And giving the mistress accountability does not absolve the husband. Two people can be responsible for the damage in two different ways.
The more we normalize or excuse deliberate interference because “she didn't owe the wife anything,” the easier it becomes to dismiss behavior that is manipulative, deceptive, and destructive.