u/Odd-Heron5704

The original offside rule was invented to avoid playing hogging in the box, which would lead to really boring football and it'd be too much of an advantage. Offside was played during decades and most of the time linemen wouldn't call millimetre offsides, so the original philosophy of the offside rule was kept anyway.

However, with VAR, now you can be offside by 1 mm in 1 frame of the camera. These offsides would never have been called in the past. Therefore I believe an update to the rules, so that they follow the initial philosophy would be better, and Wenger's daylight rule where your whole body would be offside would provide that.

I think it'd make games more dynamic, encourage attacks and it will be subjectively clearer to call. I know mathematically it's the same, but not in people's minds.

Same as for a goal the ball has to be fully across the line, I think for offside the whole body of the attacker should be ahead.

Some people are worried that this will hurt football and lead to teams defending "parking the bus". I do not think that would be the case. The changes would be small anyway. But it would certainly lead to less frustrations in very close calls. Now if you're offside you're clearly offside, nobody would complain. And it'd help attacking steams SLIGHTLY to be more offensive, since they would need to worry less about offsides and super quick "offside traps" would be harder to execute, e.g. in free kicks.

For players it's way easier to spot daylight offside too, it goes with basic human instinct. When you're walking/running, etc, you subconsciously know if you're not overlapping with someone. But knowing if just your toenail is offside is impossible.

Would make matches a lot more dynamic and exciting and also give a bit more advantage to the attackers, which is good.

This would remove all those silly "toenail" or "shoulder" offsides. Now your full body would need to be offside.

By comparison, a goal is considered goal if the ball is FULLY through the line. Same logic should be used for offside, there shouldn't be room for ambguity in a goal, same as in an offside.

This would stop all borderline calls that make no sense. Example the offside between Croatia and Portugal (I know that's using some automated call but to give an example).

All refs in VAR have an anonymous button. If they do not all agree on a call then play is simply continued an no foul/handball/offside/penalty is called.

I'm referring to prizes given to teams in competitions, and especially in very reputable competitions, such as World Cup and Champions League, where everyone wants to win anyway. For leagues perhaps the usual system is good since it can provide most of the revenue for teams/players.

Everyone already wants to win. Brings you reputation, more possibilities for sponsors, player development, etc, etc. So no need to incentivise this further.

So the incentive should be based on something else, e.g. on goals.

Goals are what brings excitement to people. Yes, that's why people celebrate like crazy when there's a goal, it's the peak of the game. So giving an extra incentive would be great and reward players for brining that excitement

Cuando perdes obvio.

Me colgue viendo el Argentina-España, el Argentina-Francia de 2018, etc. E igual aunque ya se como termina igual me hago mala sangre jajaja y me pone nervioso (no tanto como ver un partido en vivo obvio, eso ultimamente ya casi me paso de estres jaja).

If an offside is called automatically then people would get a lot less disappointed at milimetric offsides, since players wouldn't have time to score (and even if they did, e.g. header), there would be no time to wait. Similar to tennis now with automatic line calls.

Players have the sensor, the ball already has the sensor, so you can determine who's on side, or offside.

It may need some adjustment of borderline cases of the rules, but that's worth it to get the automatic instant calls.

Obviously only the sensor is what would be offside. Sensor could be in the torso or in the feet. VAR would alway stay as backup system in the unlikely scenario a sensor fails, etc, but the vast majority of offsides would be instantly called.

Y habria que hacer algun cambio en las reglas para corregirlo?

Estaba viendo partidos del mundial 78 y nada que ver. Los equipos sacaban del arco y enseguida llegaban al otro arco, se buscaba hacer goles etc. El equipo contrario tambien "te dejaba jugar", es decir, no te trataba de bloquear el avance desde tu area o el mediocampo, etc. Esperaban un poco mas atras ya y se arrancaba de ahi.

Ahora salen de atras, estan 5min viendo de llegar al mediocampo, no arriesgan nada.

Ya se que se supone que esto en realidad te hace ganar partidos, pero imaginate si vas con amigos el sabado y juegan asi. Yo no voy mas jaja.

Lo lindo del futbol es que las reglas son super basicas, pero capaz habria que poner alguna regla para obligar a los equipos a arriesgar?

No digo que haya goles, de hecho a veces cuando esta empatado un partido tambien hay mucha emocion. Pero esta bueno que los equipos esten cerca del area y haya riesgo. Ahora el mayor riesgo parece ser cuando saca el arquero a ver si se equivoca en los pases y le clavan un gol.

Y pregunta yapa, esto lo invento Guardiola, no? O lo llevo a su maxima expresion digamos.

Capaz el futbol tendria que tener un contador a lo basket para el tiempo que podes estar en tu propia mitad? Y como contra-partida el equipo contrario tiene que esperar en su mitad en el saque de arco?

Otra opcion para ligas es dar 5 puntos para ganar, 1 empate. Para copas se vuelve mas complicado.

what's the rationale behind this? For a professional footballer, they have great control with their head as well to pass to the goalkeeper. Actually it's probably even a safer pass (although from shorter distance) since it's probably impossible to catch by an attacker.

I'm confused, there are footballs from £10 to £150.

By "good" I mean a football that you can bring to a university level match and people would be happy to use. They won't be "why did you bring that crap?"

Also, there are so many sub models for one series (e.g. Puma Orbital goes from Play £10 to Ultimate £80) that it gets very confusing.

Is there a tier list or something for footballs and which tier would be the recommended for university level?

If people could give EXACT MODELS when they talk about a ball it'd really help, since with a similar name there are loads. A link would be great too.

This would remove a lot of controversy regarding fouls. If you commit a foul you just raise your hand, apologize and move on. Otherwise you get a higher penalty.

Similar to how other sports work, e.g. in volleyball if you think the ball is going out you have to leave it out, if you keep playing you're accepting the ball is in.

In tennis (at least before the fully automated calls) if you thought a ball was out you had to stop playing, if you play it then you cannot challenge it anymore.

Of course I don't mean apologizing would save you from e.g. a card, it's just that the penalty would be higher than what it is now.

This goes hand in hand with stopping playing arguing with the ref all the time.

Saco la noticia TN ahora despues de Infobae. Fue confirmado por Newells y la liga profesional tambien.

https://x.com/Newells/status/2086078622620651934

https://x.com/LigaAFA/status/2086079194182656296