u/Odd_Departure_1159

Hi i am 26m i have beem detected with 9.2 mm kidney stone today but i do not feel any pain what medical choices i have i will consult urologist tomorrow but what kind of changes i should be ready for and medical procedure should i prepare for ? Can it pass on it's own ?

I would like to add i am college soccer player doing phd would it affect my deadlines and would it affect my atheltic training in anyway

I detected it during regular free sonography

Detected with kidney stone where should i go for urologist checkups best in jodhpur having job at goverment hospital preferred

Hi i am 26m i have beem detected with 9.2 mm kidney stone today but i do not feel any pain what medical choices i have i will consult urologist tomorrow but what kind of changes i should be ready for and medical procedure should i prepare for ? Can it pass on it's own ?

I would like to add i am college soccer player doing phd would it affect my deadlines and would it affect my atheltic training in anyway

I detected it during regular free sonography

I worked as an SDE for 3 years before leaving to join an SRF position. At the time, I genuinely believed research was the right path for me. I accepted a significant pay cut because I thought the opportunity to work on AI/NLP and prepare for GATE would be worth it.

Over time, I've realized that while I enjoy the work, I see my long-term career in software engineering rather than research. My current role is also a fixed-term contract, so I've started looking to transition back.

What has surprised me is how difficult it has been to get interviews. I expected my previous industry experience, combined with the work I've been doing in research, to make the transition smoother.

So I have one question: is it still realistically possible to transition back into software engineering after spending time in research, or is the industry just that difficult right now?

I worked as an SDE for 3 years before leaving to join an SRF position. At the time, I genuinely believed research was the right path for me. I accepted a significant pay cut because I thought the opportunity to work on AI/NLP and prepare for GATE would be worth it.

Over time, I've realized that while I enjoy the work, I see my long-term career in software engineering rather than research. My current role is also a fixed-term contract, so I've started looking to transition back.

What has surprised me is how difficult it has been to get interviews. I expected my previous industry experience, combined with the work I've been doing in research, to make the transition smoother.

So I have one question: is it still realistically possible to transition back into software engineering after spending time in research, or is the industry just that difficult right now?

I wanted some new team to win or reach finals otherwise it's boring hence supported england( also bellingham) but man what is up with this argentinan players mentality we should learn from them they fight like crazyyy ( though england parked the bus) i have never been so inspired by any team . Dude they literally were creating chances till last minute. What a inspiration we( especially I) should learn from them.

I want to buy a house 800 -1000 sqft in kuldeep vihar ( br birla school )or vaishnav nagar or nearby areas please let me know.

3 of friends (girls) are looking for 1 bhk for 1 month only non drinkers non smokers and no issue if anyone has let me know to be near ratanada or paota they are from iit jodhpur

https://preview.redd.it/5jb4shd4adbh1.png?width=1179&format=png&auto=webp&s=5e685d2028092f7584da6bfee78a9961c5f527cc

First of all how can we have 2 way interleaved if our data bus is only 16 bit and how can i get two 16 bit word in one go please please explain me this concept in comment please
second doubt : The question does not require this concept any way but it say s in go overflow site
Total number of block access =(512/4+100×1028/4+512/4)=25956=(512/4+100×1028/4+512/4)=25956

All the blocks above and below the loop region can be assumed to be cache misses.

It is given that the cache is fully associative but the replacement policy is not mentioned. Let's assume it is FIFO.FIFO. Also, for simplicity let's assume that there's no reuse within a cache block.

In the first loop access every cache access will be a miss. Since the loop body size is 10281028 and we assumed FIFO,FIFO, the last cache block will replace the first one. In the second iteration, first cache block access will be a miss and this will replace the second cache block. Going like this every cache block access will be a miss.

(i) So, hit ratio =0.=0.
but i can just replace the last block making only one miss i.e recently accessed line in cache memory making only one miss per acess to make my hit ratio very good

Hi i am software engineer with 4 yoe i have good knowledge of os internals, coa ,multithreadin and network programming and embedded and c++ ,python and have worked with systems side and application side both .

I want to build my career around gpu and/ or compiler engineering and i am currently exploring them but apart from theory i firmly believe you can learn more my working in real projects and doing real firefighting are there any starups in india that work on this stack ? are there any such founders available on this sub if yes can you guys give me a chance please let me know

Thanks

Hi i am software engineer with 4 yoe i have good knowledge of os internals, coa ,multithreadin and network programming and embedded and c++ ,python and have worked with systems side and application side both .

I want to build my career around gpu and/ or compiler engineering and i am currently exploring them but apart from theory i firmly believe you can learn more my working in real projects and doing real firefighting are there any starups in india that work on this stack ? are there any such founders available on this sub if yes can you guys give me a chance please let me know

Thanks

Hey everyone,

​I’m currently studying how TCP works, and I have two specific scenarios that are tripping me up regarding Window Sizes and MSS. Hopefully, someone can help clarify them for me:

​Window Size vs. Received Data: Suppose the server's window size is 1,000 bytes. It receives 500 bytes from the client. In the next packet sent back to the client, will the server advertise a window size of 500, or will it stay at 1,000? Does it depend entirely on whether the application has read the data out of the buffer, or does it automatically drop?

​MSS Over the Wire: Is the Maximum Segment Size (MSS) actually included inside every standard TCP packet header, or is it just calculated by the host? If it is sent, does it only happen during the initial 3-way handshake (SYN/SYN-ACK)?

​Window Size > MSS: What happens on the wire when the receiver's advertised window size is significantly larger than the agreed-upon MSS? Does the sender just blast multiple MSS-sized packets sequentially without waiting for an ACK?

Ps : used gemni to formulate

​

I'm validating an idea and would appreciate honest feedback.

My view is that professional profiles today are broken. Resumes are self-reported, and LinkedIn has increasingly become a place for personal branding, engagement farming, and marketing. It's difficult to tell what someone has actually built versus what they claim to have done.

The idea is to create a **proof-of-work platform** where your profile is built around verifiable work rather than self-written descriptions.

Software Engineer :

* GitHub-connected profiles

* Verified commits, PRs, code reviews, issues resolved, and projects

* Open-source and private project portfolios

* Team contribution history

* Technical skills inferred from actual work

A unique feature would be the ability to form teams directly on the platform using GitHub identities.

For example:

* Create a team around a project

* Assign tasks to contributors

* Track who actually completed what

* Have engineering managers or project leads within the team

* Build a visible history of collaboration, leadership, delivery, and execution

Instead of saying "Led a team of 5 engineers" on a resume, there would be an actual record showing the project, contributors, tasks, reviews, and outcomes

Research

* Research papers

* Publications

* Citations

* Patents

* Research portfolios

* Collaboration history

Other Engineering

Not every valuable project lives on GitHub.

For hardware, robotics, manufacturing, civil engineering, electronics, and other physical domains, users could upload videos, demonstrations, documentation, test results, and project evidence as proof of work.

The goal is to make it possible to verify that a person actually built something, not just wrote about it.

Hiring Side

Recruiters and founders would be able to search based on demonstrated work.

Examples:

* Engineers who have contributed to networking systems

* Contributors to specific open-source ecosystems

* Researchers in computer vision or AI

* Hardware engineers who have shipped physical projects

* Team leads with a proven history of managing technical work

The vision is not another social network.

It's a professional reputation system built around evidence rather than self-promotion.

Questions:

1. Would you create a profile if most of it could be generated automatically from your work?

2. Would you trust this more than LinkedIn or a traditional resume?

3. What would stop you from using it?

4. Is the team-management and task-assignment aspect valuable, or is GitHub already enough?

5. As a founder or recruiter, would a proof-of-work profile influence hiring decisions?

Looking for brutal feedback. Trying to figure out whether this solves a real problem or if I'm missing something obvious. Also I have one co founder for this Idea and I need one tech recruiter (senior) and one person with building digital business . Its been only 10 days since we thought of it so

I'm validating an idea and would appreciate honest feedback.

My view is that professional profiles today are broken. Resumes are self-reported, and LinkedIn has increasingly become a place for personal branding, engagement farming, and marketing. It's difficult to tell what someone has actually built versus what they claim to have done.

The idea is to create a proof-of-work platform where your profile is built around verifiable work rather than self-written descriptions.

Software Engineer :

• GitHub-connected profiles
• Verified commits, PRs, code reviews, issues resolved, and projects
• Open-source and private project portfolios
• Team contribution history
• Technical skills inferred from actual work

A unique feature would be the ability to form teams directly on the platform using GitHub identities.

For example:

• Create a team around a project
• Assign tasks to contributors
• Track who actually completed what
• Have engineering managers or project leads within the team
• Build a visible history of collaboration, leadership, delivery, and execution

Instead of saying "Led a team of 5 engineers" on a resume, there would be an actual record showing the project, contributors, tasks, reviews, and outcomes

Research

• Research papers
• Publications
• Citations
• Patents
• Research portfolios
• Collaboration history

Other Engineering

Not every valuable project lives on GitHub.

For hardware, robotics, manufacturing, civil engineering, electronics, and other physical domains, users could upload videos, demonstrations, documentation, test results, and project evidence as proof of work.

The goal is to make it possible to verify that a person actually built something, not just wrote about it.

Hiring Side

Recruiters and founders would be able to search based on demonstrated work.

Examples:

• Engineers who have contributed to networking systems
• Contributors to specific open-source ecosystems
• Researchers in computer vision or AI
• Hardware engineers who have shipped physical projects
• Team leads with a proven history of managing technical work

The vision is not another social network.

It's a professional reputation system built around evidence rather than self-promotion.

Questions:

1. Would you create a profile if most of it could be generated automatically from your work?
2. Would you trust this more than LinkedIn or a traditional resume?
3. What would stop you from using it?
4. Is the team-management and task-assignment aspect valuable, or is GitHub already enough?
5. As a founder or recruiter, would a proof-of-work profile influence hiring decisions?

Looking for brutal feedback. Trying to figure out whether this solves a real problem or if I'm missing something obvious. Also I have one co founder for this Idea and I need one tech recruiter (senior) and one person with building digital business . Its been only 10 days since we thought of it so

Are you guys also facing similar issues the title suggest we should gather and ask the authority what is the issue and how it can be solved in my house it's been month since proper water supply. We are calling tankers for a month .

I want to eat as authentic as possible italian pizza -thin base with mozerella where can i find such pizza in jodhpur and if available 8n swiggy/zomato

Hi i recently got call from cynlr is anyone here working for this company how is the work should i proceed with their process and what they can pay.

Is the list out where is it .