u/OkChance3303

During rear entry she gets these intense deep orgasms and describes it as feeling like I'm pushing past her cervix to reach something deep inside she says she feels it in her stomach . Did some research and I'm pretty sure it's her anterior fornix (A-spot) that deep spot just above the cervix on the front wall.

My theory is that the upward curve redirects the head toward the anterior wall even from behind, basically acting like a natural hook aimed at the right spot given the entry angle. Doggy style already gives the depth needed to reach the fornix and the curve does the rest.

Does this track for anyone else? Curious if other guys have noticed their specific curve consistently hitting spots that might be harder to reach with straight anatomy.

My last in more important question how do I queue this up to be something we can achieve every single time ?

Not talking about new grads or people who’ve been job hopping every 2 years and staying sharp. I mean the engineers who landed a solid role around 2017–2019, put their head down, shipped real products for 5–7 years, and then got caught in the post-boom layoffs.
These people built actual systems. They’ve debugged production outages at 2am, mentored junior devs, navigated legacy codebases that would make most people quit on day one. And now they’re sitting across from a 25-year-old asking them to implement a segment tree under time pressure on a shared screen.
A few things have genuinely changed since the last time a lot of these folks interviewed:
The bar shifted. A senior engineer who interviewed at Google in both 2021 and 2024 noted that LeetCode Hard problems — which he assumed were never asked — have now become the norm. That’s not a small jump.
The volume is brutal. At least 127,000 workers at U.S.-based tech companies were laid off in 2025 alone, and a lot of them are strong engineers flooding the same application pools.
The format itself has gotten more adversarial. System design rounds that used to be reserved for senior engineers now start at mid-level, and senior candidates are getting Staff-level scope questions. The goalposts moved on everyone while some people weren’t looking.
And the kicker is — engineers who have built incredible real-world applications are struggling to clear interviews because they haven’t looked at graph theory in a decade. That’s not a skills gap. That’s a preparation gap for a very specific performance.
I’ve seen people with 20 years of experience describe spending sleepless nights grinding LeetCode just to get 5 rejections in 4 months. Not because they’re bad engineers. Because the interview is essentially a separate skill from the job.
So genuinely curious — for those of you who’ve been through this:
• How big of a gap did you feel between what you knew and what was being tested?
• Did your years of real-world experience actually help you at any point in the process, or did it feel irrelevant?
• What did you actually have to do to get back in interview shape?
• And honestly — did landing eventually feel worth it, or did the process change how you see the industry?
No judgment either way. Just feel like this story doesn’t get told enough compared to the new grad struggle.