u/Ok_Blacksmith1684

So, I grew up in the 80's with great men's (and womens) tennis. By the time we hit 2005, Sampras was the best ever. Then, something crazy happened...Federer and Nadal, probably the two most popular men's players ever, battled it out in both of their primes....then Nadal taking over late, even after many injuries...all the while Djokovic quietly became an assasin while overlapping 75% of Federrer and Nadals careers....who is the best ever? Based on grand slams, its Djokovic...the popular and biased vote would say Federrer or Nadal. I want to say Fedderer or Nadal...BUT...the answer is probably Djokovic. Djokovic has 24 grand slams and is still going...Nadal 22 and Roger 20...your unbiased opinions?

The movie is great and it's not just a horror movie. It has a great secondary plot, which is a big part of the movie and is explained through the characters. If anyone watched Sinners simply as a horror movie and didn't pick up on this, maybe watch it again. You may enjoy it more the second time. Hint: Jim Crow

I don't get it. Does he need to be more consistent next year and progress? Yes, but so does every other top QB.

He has the best skill set when combining his arm, legs, mental aspect, and size. He also comes from a great pedigree and could handle NY.

He threw for 27 TD and 7 interceptions last year playing the # 3 SOS, and while Texas had a below average o-line. Arch probably had the most hype and pressure of any QB in the history of college ball, and his 1st game was on the road against Ohio St.

If all QB's progress evenly, I am running to the podium with Arch as the Jets pick.