Arrogant pseudo-intellectual apologists
I find this genre of theists/religious subscribers to be the worst. Superficially it seems they are cognisant enough to know better than the nonsense they defend, however they engage in deeply dishonest and pseudo-intellectual rhetorics in defense of their faecal 'beliefs'. They misconstrue science and history, and falsely attribute to their religion things that don't belong to it. It's worse when they include 'philosophical' nonsense in their squabbling. Their statements aren't of better value than that of your average believer yet I find theirs to be rather more embarrassing, appalling and infuriating. These people to me are the stereotypical pigeons who shit on chessboards and claim victory.