Theoretical vs practical accelerationism
tl;dr:
Childfree accelerationists are theoretical accelerationists.
Families are practical accelerationists. Have always been.
Came to vent.
So I am an accelerationist. Whenever I mention it on climate-related forums, I am guarranteed to get downvoted and rebuked.
But if you look at my carbon footprint, it's tiny, just necessary stuff, wifi, smartphone, fridge, electricity, smartphone, laptop, a couple of subscriptions, water boiler. I don't even have many gadgets. Do wireless headphones count as such?
I have no car, no AC. I don't even produce much municipal waste. I carry around plastic bags and reuse carton packages for note-taking.
I am an Environmental Saint!
All my accelerationism is purely theoretical and just wishful thinking.
Now, the real drivers of accelerationism - the practitioners - are parents. The people who produce surplus of future adults who will use 2-6k of diapers in the first year of their innocent lives before they get potty-trained.
Those get upvotes, sympathy, empathy, praise, encouragement, digital foot massages and such.
And don't start with "Bbbbut parents in the 3rd world are environmentally sustainable!"
I am in the third world as well. So, i hope it should neutralize the charge.
Yeah, I mean, it's a blissful society.