In response
Hi all,
Looks like a post of mine caused a little stir here so thought I'd address some points from OP's response.
On colonialism: to claim that Singapore’s dating scene is a direct product of “racial hierarchies established during the colonial period” as you put it would be a bit misleading as it's too black and white. I said there may be "residual effects" from that history, an intentionally more tentative way of putting it, and one of several possible factors I raised.
It was poor wording in my original post tbf as I heavily implied it, but I never actually said I was a 6. I'd probably rate myself a 7.5/8, I take care of myself and my presentation. Just wanted that on record.
As many of the commentors on my original post did, I reckon you might've misinterpreted my theories on money and status. What I claimed was essentially "white people are often expats > expats are often wealthier > that makes them attractive". But you seem to have misconstrued that as "European countries have a lower GDP > they should not be as attractive". Pretty specious reasoning iyam. I never even mentioned what country I was from (I did imply US tbf) because it's irrelevant to the point.
With all that said, I do understand why my colonialism point can feel humiliating. British imperialism was fucked. China still feels the effects of a whole "century of humiliation" as they call it. Acknowledging possible historical residues is not the same as endorsing them and these effects aren't felt equally among Singaporeans.
Feel free to dispute any of my theories as they're only that, theories. I love a good debate in the comments.