u/One_Term2162

From Gold Coins to Digital Dollars: How America's Money System Changed

From Gold Coins to Digital Dollars: How America's Money System Changed

​

Every American uses money. We earn it, spend it, save it, borrow it, and pay taxes with it.

Yet few of us are ever taught where our money system came from, why inflation exists, or how the United States moved from gold and silver coins to a world of digital dollars and electronic transactions.

To understand the debates of today, we must first understand the history.

The Founders and the Constitution

When the Constitution was written, the Founders had fresh memories of financial chaos.

Under the Articles of Confederation, states issued their own paper currencies, debts were paid in different forms of money, and inflation frequently eroded confidence in commerce.

As a result, the Constitution gave Congress the power to coin money and regulate its value. At the same time, the states were prohibited from coining money, issuing bills of credit, or making anything but gold and silver coin legal tender for debts.

The goal was stability. A young nation could not survive if every state operated under its own monetary system.

Yet even among the Founders there was disagreement.

Alexander Hamilton favored a strong national financial system and believed public credit was essential to national prosperity.

Thomas Jefferson feared concentrated financial power and worried that banking institutions could eventually gain influence over the people and their government.

The debate between Hamilton and Jefferson would continue long after both men were gone.

America's Early Boom-and-Bust Economy

Many Americans imagine the gold standard as an era of perfect stability.

History tells a different story.

During the 1800s, the United States experienced repeated financial panics and recessions. Crashes occurred in 1819, 1837, 1857, 1873, and 1893, among others.

Banks failed.

Credit evaporated.

Businesses collapsed.

Workers lost jobs.

Gold and silver did not eliminate boom-and-bust cycles. They simply limited how much governments and banks could expand the money supply during a crisis.

The nation repeatedly found itself asking the same question:

How do you provide stability without giving too much power to financial institutions?

The Panic of 1907 and the Birth of the Federal Reserve

The crisis reached a breaking point in 1907.

A severe banking panic spread through the financial system. Depositors rushed to withdraw funds, credit markets froze, and many feared a complete collapse.

Private banker J.P. Morgan organized emergency rescue efforts, but many leaders concluded that the nation should not depend on a single financier to stabilize the economy.

In 1913, Congress created the Federal Reserve System.

Its purpose was to serve as a lender of last resort, stabilize banking, and help manage the nation's money supply.

Supporters saw the Federal Reserve as a practical solution to recurring crises.

Critics saw the creation of a powerful central bank as a departure from the Founders' original vision.

The debate continues more than a century later.

The Great Depression Changes Everything

The stock market crash of 1929 and the Great Depression tested every assumption about the American economy.

Banks failed by the thousands.

Unemployment soared.

Businesses closed.

The crisis led President Franklin Roosevelt to take extraordinary measures.

In 1933, Americans could no longer freely exchange dollars for gold. The federal government increased its control over monetary policy in an effort to stabilize the economy.

The relationship between citizens, money, and government had fundamentally changed.

Bretton Woods and the Dollar's Rise

After World War II, the United States emerged as the world's dominant economic power.

Under the Bretton Woods system, foreign governments could exchange dollars for gold, while most international trade increasingly flowed through American currency.

The dollar became the center of the global financial system.

For a time, the arrangement provided stability and helped support decades of economic growth.

But the system faced mounting pressure as government spending increased and more dollars circulated throughout the world.

The Nixon Shock

In 1971, President Richard Nixon ended the ability of foreign governments to exchange dollars for gold.

This decision effectively ended the last major link between the dollar and precious metals.

The United States entered the modern era of fiat currency.

Today, the dollar is not backed by gold or silver.

Its value rests on the productive capacity of the American economy, the government's taxing authority, and public confidence in the system.

For some Americans, this change represented necessary modernization.

For others, it marked a historic break from the monetary principles that shaped the nation's founding.

Why Does the Federal Reserve Want Inflation?

One of the most surprising facts for many citizens is that the Federal Reserve does not seek zero inflation.

Instead, it generally targets approximately 2 percent annual inflation.

Federal Reserve officials argue that modest inflation encourages spending and investment, reduces the risk of deflation, and provides flexibility during economic downturns.

Critics argue that inflation gradually reduces purchasing power, rewards debt accumulation, and encourages financial speculation.

The result is an ongoing debate about who benefits and who bears the costs.

The Question for Citizens

America's money system has changed dramatically since the Constitution was written.

We have moved from gold and silver coins to paper currency, central banking, electronic payments, and digital transactions measured in fractions of a second.

Yet one thing has remained constant:

Citizens are expected to live within the system whether they understand it or not.

Perhaps the most important question is not whether one supports the Federal Reserve, the gold standard, or fiat currency.

Perhaps the more important question is whether a self-governing people should understand the history, assumptions, and tradeoffs behind the monetary system that shapes their daily lives.

After all, every paycheck, every mortgage, every retirement account, every tax bill, and every trip to the grocery store is connected to decisions made about money.

The debate over those decisions is not merely economic.

It is civic.

u/One_Term2162 — 14 hours ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 10.3k r/selfevidenttruth+13 crossposts

AOC: This is what drinking water in Georgia looks like after Meta began data center construction in the community.

u/Bull1753361 — 22 hours ago

Down the Ballot Hole: A Letter to the Burnt-Out Citizenry

Dear Burnt-Out Citizenry

Are you tired of being told to care about every crisis, every scandal, every headline, every alarm bell?

Are you tired of watching the same old fights get dragged back into the street while rent rises, wages lag, schools strain, roads crumble, and ordinary citizens are told to pick a team and shut up?

Then maybe the first act of citizenship is not outrage.

Maybe it is asking better questions.

The FBI contacting Wisconsin election officials over the 2020 election should not be waved away, and it should not be blindly cheered. Lawful investigations have a place. But when the legal basis is unclear, when a settled election is reopened after audits, court cases, certifications, and reviews, and when there is concern about records that could threaten ballot secrecy, citizens have a duty to ask what is really happening.

So let us ask the old questions in a modern form.

>First grievance: Is public trust being protected, or weaponized?
The Founders objected when power acted against the public good. So ask: is this investigation restoring confidence with clear evidence and lawful process, or is it keeping suspicion alive for political gain?

>Second grievance: Are officers serving justice, or creating fear?
The Declaration condemned sending “swarms of officers” among the people. So ask: when federal agents contact local election workers, even at their homes, does that protect elections, or does it intimidate the citizens who administer them?

>Third grievance: Is law enforcement independent, or answering political grievance?
The Founders warned against government power being bent to one ruler’s will. So ask: is our current administration using federal authority to pursue actual crimes, or to relitigate one man’s refusal to accept defeat?

>Fourth grievance: Is the private vote still sacred?
A republic cannot survive if citizens fear their ballot may someday be traced back to them. So ask: if ballots or records are sought, what protections exist to guarantee that no citizen’s vote is ever connected to their name?

>Fifth grievance: Are old wounds being healed, or reopened?
The Declaration warned against stirring division among the people. So ask: after years of reviews, lawsuits, audits, and certifications, is this about truth, or about keeping citizens angry, suspicious, and exhausted?

You do not have to scream to be awake.

You only have to refuse the easy narrative.

Ask for the statute.
Ask for the warrant.
Ask for the evidence.
Ask who is being protected.
Ask who is being pressured.
Ask who benefits from the fear.

Because election integrity without transparency becomes a slogan.

Law enforcement without accountability becomes a weapon.

And ballot secrecy without protection becomes a promise waiting to be broken.

The vote does not belong to the powerful.

It belongs to the citizen.

wisconsinwatch.org
u/One_Term2162 — 6 days ago

Game Theory #25: Trump Visits China

I watched this today, im curious what other think about it?

It is a long video. But I'd love others perspective.

youtu.be
u/One_Term2162 — 6 days ago
▲ 1.4k r/selfevidenttruth+1 crossposts

Virginia is giving Big Tech $1.9 BILLION a year in tax breaks that you never voted on. Your electric bill is through the roof. They're draining 5 million gallons of water a day. And they're telling combat vets the well is dry.

The rapid growth of data centers across Virginia has triggered intense public debate over economic fairness, energy strain, and resource consumption. Critics point out that data center operators claimed roughly $1.9 billion in sales tax exemptions on equipment in fiscal year 2025 alone. This policy, originally established by state lawmakers in 2008 and extended through 2035, was never put to a direct taxpayer vote, leading to growing calls for legislative reform.

At the same time, this massive digital expansion impacts everyday utility costs and local resources. Energy analysts warn that skyrocketing electricity demand from these facilities could add an estimated $444 annually to average residential power bills by 2040 to cover necessary grid upgrades. Water consumption is another major flashpoint, as a single high-demand facility can use up to 5 million gallons of water a day for cooling. This heavy reliance on local aquifers has sparked deep concern over regional water security, especially during droughts when local communities face strict conservation measures.

u/CollapsingTheWave — 5 days ago

The Cloud Is Coming for Titletown

Dear Green Bay: While Lambeau Sings, Who Is Signing the Deals?

Dear Exhausted Citizenry,

Tonight, Green Bay is alive. People are gathering around Lambeau Field for Luke Combs, and it shows what makes this area worth protecting: community, music, small businesses, families, neighbors, and local pride.

I am grateful to live in a place that is growing. I am grateful for Green Bay, Howard, Ashwaubenon, De Pere, Allouez, Suamico, Bellevue, Hobart, and every surrounding community that still feels like it belongs to the people who live here.

That is why we need to pay attention.

I have seen talk that Howard may be looked at as a possible location for an AI data center. I have not seen enough public proof to say that for certain. But if citizens are hearing rumors before seeing public documents, something is already wrong.

AI data centers are not just “the cloud.” They are industrial-scale machines that need land, water, roads, electricity, substations, sewer systems, emergency services, tax deals, and public permission.

Data centers already use more than 4% of U.S. electricity, and that could rise to as much as 12% by 2028. Residential electricity prices are also projected to rise about 5% in 2026. For a family paying $150 a month, that is about $90 more per year.

So when citizens ask questions, they are not being childish. They are being prudent.

These centers are not just for today’s chatbots. They are being built for tomorrow’s robots, drones, surveillance tools, automated factories, military contracts, and machine labor networks. The infrastructure laid now may become the nervous system of a future where machines watch, sort, store, patrol, predict, replace, and decide.

And while we are asking questions, citizens deserve to know who owns the cameras around the Lambeau district.

Who owns them? Who watches them? Are any license plate readers? Is plate data collected? How long is it stored? Is it shared with police, private vendors, or larger surveillance networks? Did any elected body approve those terms in public?

Those are not paranoid questions. They are basic questions for a free community.

If corporations use our roads, water, grid, schools, courts, tax dollars, public officials, and possibly our movements and data, then the public deserves a return.

Not slogans. Not ribbon cuttings. Not “trust us.”

A return.

That means lower public costs, open records, privacy protections, environmental review, public benefit agreements, permanent job guarantees, and clawbacks if promises are broken.

And let’s talk about public utilities. Wisconsin Public Service and We Energies are part of WEC Energy Group, a stock-traded corporation. Other utilities include Alliant Energy, Madison Gas and Electric, Xcel Energy, and American Transmission Company.

So citizens have the right to ask: if a public utility is tied to shareholders, who comes first, the public or the stock market?

If data centers require new substations, transmission lines, power generation, and grid upgrades, who pays?

The corporation? The shareholders? The trillion-dollar tech company? Or the ordinary ratepayer?

When utilities spend billions, that money does not vanish. It often gets recovered through rates. That means families, renters, small businesses, and citizens may end up paying the bill.

Citizens deserve to know how much water will be used. Water is not merely a resource.

Water is life.

Citizens deserve to know why NDAs are being signed. Public business should not be hidden from the public. What tax breaks were discussed? What land? What utility commitments? What rate impacts? What environmental risks?

A republic cannot survive if citizens are told to vote, pay taxes, obey laws, and fund infrastructure, but are forbidden to know what their own representatives signed.

Citizens also deserve honest job numbers. Construction jobs matter. But what remains after construction? How many permanent jobs? At what wage? For local residents? And what happens when robots, drones, remote monitoring, and AI maintenance reduce the need for human workers?

That is not anti-science.

That is pro-citizen.

The Founders taught consent of the governed. Marx taught us to ask who owns the machinery, who profits, and who pays the cost. The Progressives taught that government must act on behalf of the people when private power grows too large.

So ask every candidate and representative:

Will you oppose NDAs for public development deals?
Will you require full disclosure of water and electric demand?
Will you prove ratepayers will not pay more?
Will you publish tax incentives before approval?
Will you require environmental review?
Will you demand permanent job guarantees?
Will you disclose who owns public-facing cameras and who accesses the data?
Will you answer citizens respectfully?

Because the citizen is not a nuisance.

The citizen is not an obstacle.

The citizen is the source of legitimate power.

So to Green Bay, Howard, and every surrounding community: keep the concerts, keep the growth, keep the pride, keep the community.

But do not trade the public future away in silence.

The cloud is not above us. The camera is not above us. The machine is not above us. The corporation is not above us. The utility monopoly is not above us.

And no progress that requires secrecy from the governed is progress fit for a free people.

reddit.com
u/One_Term2162 — 7 days ago
▲ 12 r/selfevidenttruth+1 crossposts

Dear Exhausted Citizenry: On The Machine and the Republic

Dear Exhausted Citizenry,

Let us begin plainly: science is not the enemy. Invention is not the enemy. Intelligence, artificial or otherwise, is not the enemy.

A free republic should welcome discovery. It should encourage knowledge. It should build tools that improve medicine, education, farming, transportation, energy, public safety, and human life.

But there is a difference between technology that serves the people and technology that consumes the people’s inheritance.

That is the question before us now.

AI data centers are often described as if they belong to some weightless digital world. We are told they are part of “the cloud,” as though the cloud floats above us, clean and harmless.

But the cloud is not weightless.

The cloud has walls.
The cloud has pipes.
The cloud has substations.
The cloud has backup generators.
The cloud needs water.
The cloud needs roads.
The cloud needs land.
The cloud needs public permission.
The cloud needs the citizen’s infrastructure.

The U.S. Department of Energy reported that data center load growth has tripled over the past decade and is projected to double or triple again by 2028. Data centers used about 4.4% of all U.S. electricity in 2023, and could use 6.7% to 12% by 2028. In plain language, that means these buildings are not just another business moving into town. They are becoming a new class of industrial power user.

Reuters recently reported that U.S. electricity use is expected to hit new record highs in 2026 and 2027, driven in large part by AI data centers and crypto operations. Residential electricity prices are expected to rise as well. So when a citizen asks whether these projects will affect their bill, that is not childish. That is prudence.

And prudence requires foresight.

If we have Prudence, then we should imagine what comes next. These data centers are not being built only for today’s chatbots. They are being built for tomorrow’s drones, robots, automated factories, surveillance tools, predictive policing systems, military contracts, logistics networks, and machine labor systems. The infrastructure being laid now may become the nervous system of a society where machines watch, calculate, move, deliver, patrol, replace, and decide.

So the citizen has the right to ask:

Who owns this infrastructure?

Who pays for it?

Who benefits from it?

Who carries the environmental cost?

Who gets the jobs?

Who loses the jobs later?

Who signed the agreement?

Why were citizens not told sooner?

In Wisconsin, these are not imaginary questions. Microsoft’s Mount Pleasant data centers are projected to use up to 8.4 million gallons of water each year, with later phases reaching a peak of 702,000 gallons per day. Those numbers were released only after a lawsuit over public records.

Wisconsin Watch found that at least four Wisconsin communities used nondisclosure agreements around major data center projects, and that seven major Wisconsin data center projects together were worth more than $57 billion. One of those projects, in Beaver Dam, was kept quiet for more than a year while officials negotiated around a proposal from one of the richest corporations on Earth.

That is the heart of the matter.

If a corporation needs our roads, our water, our grid, our public education system, our police and fire services, our zoning boards, our courts, our tax incentives, and our elected officials, then the citizen deserves full daylight.

No NDA should be allowed to hide the public’s business from the public.

No representative should sign away the future of a community and then scold the citizens for asking what was signed.

No official should call constituents childish for asking adult questions about water, electricity, land, taxes, pollution, and public cost.

The Founders taught that legitimate government rests on the consent of the governed. Marx taught us to ask who owns the machinery, who profits from it, who is made dependent upon it, and who is left paying the cost. The Progressives taught that when private power grows too large for ordinary citizens to confront alone, democratic government must act on behalf of the citizen.

Put those together and the question becomes unavoidable:

Did the people consent to having their public infrastructure converted into private machine capacity?

The Progressive Era did not oppose industry. It opposed the rule of the people by industry. It understood that railroads, monopolies, trusts, utilities, and industrial barons could become so powerful that the ordinary citizen no longer bargained as an equal. Government neutrality became a lie. If government did nothing, it had chosen the side of concentrated power.

That lesson has returned.

Only now the new trusts are not just steel, oil, railroads, and banks. They are cloud platforms, AI companies, surveillance contractors, data brokers, utility-scale server farms, and corporations powerful enough to ask local governments for secrecy before the citizen even knows what is being negotiated.

The issue is not whether AI should exist.

The issue is whether AI will serve the republic, or whether the republic will be reorganized to serve AI.

Water is not merely an input. It is life.

Electricity is not merely an expense. It is the nervous system of modern civilization.

Roads are not merely pavement. They are public arteries.

Schools are not merely workforce pipelines. They are the seedbeds of citizenship.

Public utilities were not built so corporations could privatize the benefit and socialize the cost.

And this problem is not limited to water. Researchers studying data center water demand warn that U.S. data centers could require 697 to 1,451 million gallons per day of new water capacity by 2030 if current water-use patterns continue. That is comparable to New York City’s average daily water supply.

So when a citizen asks, “How much water will this use?” that is not ignorance.

When a citizen asks, “Will my electric bill go up?” that is not fearmongering.

When a citizen asks, “How many permanent jobs will actually remain after construction?” that is not anti-growth.

When a citizen asks, “Will robots and drones eventually reduce even those jobs?” that is not paranoia. That is foresight.

When a citizen asks, “Why did my representatives sign an NDA?” that is not childish. That is republican citizenship.

The citizen is not a nuisance to be managed.

The citizen is the source of legitimate power.

If these projects are truly good for the public, then prove it in public.

Show the water demand.

Show the electric demand.

Show the grid upgrades.

Show who pays.

Show the tax incentives.

Show the road costs.

Show the sewer costs.

Show the emergency-service costs.

Show the environmental review.

Show the backup power plan.

Show the air emissions.

Show the permanent jobs, not just the construction jobs.

Show the automation plan.

Show the clawbacks if promises are broken.

Show the agreement.

Show the citizen the public business done in the citizen’s name.

A republic cannot survive if its people are told to trust deals they are forbidden to read.

This is where the Progressive duty of government returns. Government must not act merely as the concierge of capital. It must act as the guardian of the public welfare. It must make private power answerable to public right.

That does not mean stopping science.

It means democratizing its consequences.

It means saying that if AI is built on public infrastructure, then it owes the public more than slogans.

It owes transparency.

It owes accountability.

It owes enforceable public benefit.

It owes clean air, protected water, fair utility rates, honest job numbers, open records, and respect for the citizens who must live with the consequences.

The machine may be intelligent.

But it is not sovereign.

The corporation may be wealthy.

But it is not the republic.

The representative may sign the paper.

But the citizen has the right to read it.

And if this new age of artificial intelligence is to be worthy of a free people, then it must not become an artificial aristocracy: a new ruling class feeding private machines with public resources while telling the people to be quiet, grateful, and uninformed.

No.

The cloud is not above the republic.

The machine is not above the citizen.

And progress that requires secrecy from the governed is not progress fit for a free people.

reddit.com
u/One_Term2162 — 7 days ago
▲ 2.7k r/selfevidenttruth+2 crossposts

The Omnipresent Eye: Al Surveillance, Nano-Tracking, and the End of Public Anonymity

The convergence of artificial intelligence, digital IDs, advanced trackers, and nanobots are all rapidly shifting the world toward a highly surveilled and interconnected ecosystem. Today, surveillance cameras no longer just record footage; they use intelligent anomaly detection and facial recognition to actively track individuals across cities in real time. This continuous monitoring pairs directly with digital identification systems, which are becoming mandatory or heavily encouraged in regions like the European Union, India, and China, creating a centralized chokepoint for auditing a citizen’s everyday life. Meanwhile, smartphones act as constant tracking devices, allowing data brokers to harvest billions of data points to build intimate behavioral profiles on the population. This surveillance even integrates into everyday items, with smart glasses now capable of capturing walking gaits, voice patterns, and faces to build extensive digital databases. On a smaller scale, the Internet of Nano-Things is emerging through nanobots and nano-cameras designed for biomedical diagnostics, in vivo biosensing, and environmental monitoring. At the same time, this strict digital tracking is being applied to machines, with regions like China assigning unique eleven-character identification numbers to humanoid robots to track their entire lifespan, performance, and maintenance records.

Supporting this colossal influx of sensory, behavioral, and biometric data requires an unprecedented physical infrastructure, triggering an aggressive global surge in data center development. Tech giants and institutional investors are injecting hundreds of billions of dollars into massive server hubs to handle the storage, training, and real-time processing demands of continuous AI surveillance. Global data center IT capacity is expanding rapidly, with projections indicating total capacity will double from 103 gigawatts to 200 gigawatts by 2030 to prevent information bottlenecks. This massive expansion of storage facilities forms the backbone for a parallel shift in the global financial architecture: the rise of a tokenized world economy. Traditional financial systems are migrating to blockchain networks, converting physical properties, corporate stocks, bank deposits, and sovereign debts into programmable digital tokens. Financial institutions like BlackRock are accelerating this trend through tokenized money market funds, driving market projections toward trillions of dollars by the end of the decade. When integrated, these systems allow every movement, biometric signature, stored byte of data, and economic transaction to be continuously logged, audited, and exchanged within a single unified digital matrix. Together, these technologies are fundamentally changing the landscape of privacy and individual autonomy.

u/CollapsingTheWave — 7 days ago
▲ 584 r/selfevidenttruth+1 crossposts

What is the USA and Trump’s goal in China bringing the most powerful technology CEO’s to China?

u/One_Term2162 — 9 days ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 103.8k r/selfevidenttruth+7 crossposts

Solarpunk is a movement that imagines a sustainable and optimistic future where humanity thrives in harmony with nature.

u/21Kuranashi — 9 days ago

AOC: “Redistricting in TN, NC, TX, FL, MI, none of that challenged or overturned by the courts despite very clear and brazen constitutional violations, such as in the state of FL… What the difference is here, in the state of VA, is that… this court did not overturn a map, it overturned an election.”

v.redd.it
u/One_Term2162 — 12 days ago
▲ 22 r/selfevidenttruth+2 crossposts

So Long, and Thanks for All the Flock

Forty-Two Cameras and the Flock That Ate the Fourth Amendment

Dear Silent Citizenry,

When a government derives its just powers from the consent of the governed, it owes the people not secrecy dressed as safety, but transparency rooted in law. A decent respect for the rights of the people requires that the City of Green Bay explain, justify, limit, and make fully accountable any system that can record, search, and trace the lawful movements of the public.

We therefore submit these grievances.

>They have refused to assent to laws most wholesome and necessary for the public good, by allowing a system of public surveillance to stand without first establishing clear and binding protections for the people, including strict limits of use, public audits, data-retention rules, access logs, search categories, agency-sharing disclosures, and remedies for abuse.

>They have forbidden the passage of measures of immediate and pressing importance, by permitting the growth of license-plate-reading cameras, private vendor databases, and drone first responder technology while leaving the people without sufficient safeguards against the abuse of such power.

>They have called public bodies to decide matters of lasting consequence without the full knowledge and understanding of the governed, placing surveillance contracts, police policies, audits, and vendor agreements beyond the plain sight of the citizens whose movements may be recorded.

>They have failed in the representative duty to oppose with firmness invasions upon the rights of the people, by allowing technology to enlarge the reach of government power while treating constitutional concern as an inconvenience rather than a warning.

>They have erected among us a multitude of watchful instruments, and by contract with private power have placed upon the public ways devices capable of recording, searching, and tracing the movements of the people.

>They have kept among us, in times of peace, a permanent system of surveillance, without first securing the full knowledge, consent, and continuing oversight of the governed.

>They have affected to render the instruments of police power independent of and superior to civil restraint, placing their operation within private systems, internal policies, unseen audits, and agreements not plainly submitted to the people.

>They have placed the ordinary citizen under suspicion without charge, by permitting the movements of the many to be gathered and searched in order to investigate the suspected few.

>They have deprived the people, in practice, of the ancient security against general searches, by allowing government to collect first, search later, and justify afterward.

>They have altered fundamentally the relationship between citizen and government, changing the public street from a place of free movement into a field of recorded passage, where one’s lawful travel may be stored, searched, shared, and examined by authorities unknown to the citizen.

>They have made public safety the language by which public liberty may be narrowed, claiming gun violence as the cause while failing to show, by public record, whether this system is used narrowly for shootings and violent crimes or broadly for warrants, traffic enforcement, suspicious activity, civil enforcement, immigration enforcement, or other purposes.

>They have permitted private power to stand between the people and their own government, by allowing a vendor to operate systems touching the liberty of citizens while the public remains uncertain who owns the data, who may access it, how long it is kept, how it is shared, and whether it may be analyzed beyond its stated purpose.

>They have turned promises into safeguards and assurances into law, though a promise hidden from public inspection is not accountability, an audit unseen by the people is not transparency, and a policy that cannot be examined is not consent.

The City of Green Bay, having entered into a five-year agreement for Flock license-plate-reading cameras and a drone first responder program, now possesses a system capable of recording, searching, and tracing the movements of the public. It asks citizens to accept assurances where visible constitutional safeguards ought to stand.

The police chief has said these cameras were installed as part of a broader effort to reduce gun violence. He has said they help officers identify a suspect’s vehicle, know who they are, and sometimes be waiting for them before they return home. Let it be plainly understood: no free people should be indifferent to gun violence. No citizen should desire that violent offenders escape justice. But the presence of violence does not dissolve the Fourth Amendment, and fear does not grant government a blank warrant over the movements of the people.

A police officer observing one car on one street is ordinary law enforcement. A network of cameras, operated with the aid of a private company, creating a searchable record of vehicle movement across the city, is something far greater. It is not mere observation. It is surveillance. It is not simply seeing what happens in public. It is building a database that allows government to look backward through the lawful movements of ordinary citizens.

The Fourth Amendment was written to forbid general searches. It was written to prevent government from gathering first and justifying later. It was written to protect the innocent as much as the accused. If Green Bay claims this system is for gun violence, then the burden is on the city to prove it.

Let the city produce the contract, the five-year agreement, the drone agreement, the data-retention policy, the camera locations, the audit logs, the access records, the case-number requirements, the search categories, the outside-agency sharing agreements, and the rules governing who may search this system and why.

Let the city show how many searches were tied to shootings, homicides, armed robberies, stolen vehicles, traffic enforcement, warrants, suspicious activity, or any other purpose. Let the city show whether Brown County, De Pere, state agencies, federal agencies, or out-of-state agencies may access Green Bay’s data. Let the city show whether this information can be used for immigration enforcement, civil enforcement, warrant sweeps, political monitoring, or any purpose beyond the stated reason of gun violence.

Let the city show who owns the data, how long it is kept, whether Flock may analyze it, whether it may be shared, and whether the public has any meaningful protection from misuse.

For a safeguard hidden from the people is not a safeguard. An audit unseen by the public is not accountability. A policy no citizen may inspect is not transparency. And a promise from government is not the same as a constitutional limit.

We therefore hold that the people of Green Bay have the right to demand records, demand answers, and demand that any surveillance power be narrow, lawful, auditable, and accountable to the citizens it claims to protect.

This is not a complaint against public safety. It is a complaint against unexamined power. This is not opposition to solving gun crimes. It is opposition to building permanent surveillance infrastructure without the full knowledge and consent of the governed.

If the city is correct, the records will prove it. If the system is narrow, the records will show narrow use. If the system is truly for gun violence, the evidence will bear that out.

But if the records show broad tracking of everyday citizens, then the people must know before silence becomes surrender.

The Constitution does not enforce itself.

It waits for citizens to speak.

reddit.com
u/One_Term2162 — 12 days ago

jennifer welch calls out alysa liu, anne hathaway, bad bunny, beyoncé, cardi b, charli xcx, connor storrie, gigi hadid, gracie abrams, gwendoline christie, hailey bieber, hudson williams, hunter schafer, jack harlow, katy perry, kardashians, rihanna, sabrina carpenter, seth meyers, troye sivan, etc.

v.redd.it
u/One_Term2162 — 17 days ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 59.2k r/selfevidenttruth+15 crossposts

https://x.com/T1LoL/status/2048370809920712885/photo/1

'Keria' continues his journey with T1 until 2029.
T1 will always be right behind him with our endless support, making sure the name 'Legendary Genius Monster' continues to shine brilliantly in the chapters to come.

Fan live reaction Video: https://x.com/ppparan22/status/2048368920558710842

Official Announcement video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Pu1-h4e5ng

His message to fans: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRRSXisEADo

Keria: Hello. First of all, I’ll be continuing together with T1. I’m very grateful that I can share this happy news with the fans in such a meaningful setting. I still have many dreams and goals left. I decided to continue because I believed that, together with T1 and together with the fans, I could achieve them. I’d be grateful if the fans continue to be with me on the journey ahead. Thank you.

u/Agreeable-Menu — 10 days ago