u/Own_Proposal_5549

It’s ironic the takeaway of Josh is done is missed despite how beloved it is across all these shows.

It’s ironic the takeaway of Josh is done is missed despite how beloved it is across all these shows.

“Josh is Done” is one of the greatest episodes in the entire Dan wrap catalog, with one of the most important lessons you could impart to any adolescent navigating sibling dynamics.

But if you notice, this episode has become a guilty pleasure rewatch for many precisely because of how lopsided the power dynamic between the boys gets. That alienation tactic Josh uses on Drake, psychologically cornering him into a space of real reflection resonates so deeply with some viewers that they wish Josh had kept it going after the episode ended. Some even argue the same tactic should be used on other characters across Dan Schneider shows in friend-group dynamics, as a kind of punishment or force for change.

That completely misses the entire point of the episode. “Josh is Done” was never about Drake changing. It was about Drake acknowledging. Even a ridiculously talented kid like Drake Parker could become a victim of ego death, and Josh was the one who initiated it by completely flipping their usual social dynamic.

u/Own_Proposal_5549 — 2 days ago

Season one is overrated

Is it good? Yeah. Did I enjoy it? Yeah. But when I read “the writing was better” and “the characters had more depth,” that’s when I know we didn’t watch the same thing. The chemistry between the cast was way weaker compared to the later seasons. Before anyone disputes this, all you have to do is watch a side-by-side comparison of the ensemble interactions to see the organic shift in chemistry. The later seasons did better on that because the cast had enough shared experience with each other and their fictional characters for it all to click by then. Chemistry is also not something writing can fix, so that’s one area the later seasons bested Season 1 on by an obvious margin.

Another famous one is the Cat lobotomy, which is really eye-rolling at this point. Every dumb character in sitcoms gradually gets dumber, so it’s not some exclusive thing to Victorious that takes me out of the experience. If this isn’t your first sitcom, you know what happened to Cat was always going to happen. That’s not even getting into the fact that they literally did nothing with this beloved unicorn version of Valentine. I’m trying to remember the relevant role she had to Tori that same season other than dating her ex for an episode, and I got nothing.

Season 1 Jade is another character I think has a very rose-tinted retrospective view from a lot of fans, because people act like she wasn’t very one-dimensional. Her whole schtick was “I hate Tori until I need help”—literally all it was. All it took was her dad being present in that season (compared to the rest) for most people to say she had “depth,” when she didn’t. Hell, even their interaction was very one-dimensional and told the audience everything we needed to know about Jade and the psychology behind her character from there.

I could get into more—like how most episodes of the first season followed the same outline compared to the later seasons being more creative—but I think I’ve stated enough points. Again, I did enjoy Season 1, but I never really got the notion it was head and shoulders above the rest. I personally prefer season 2.

reddit.com
u/Own_Proposal_5549 — 5 days ago

You could only choose one.

It’s 2005 and you see both of these on an aisle at Best Buy. Which one are you choosing?

u/Own_Proposal_5549 — 1 month ago