A Voice from 700 Years Ago That Sounds Very Familiar
I recently started reading Revelations of Divine Love by Julian of Norwich, a 14th-century English mystic. The book recounts a series of visions and revelations that Julian understood as being shown and communicated to her by Jesus. They occurred in 1373, while she was gravely ill and believed she was on her deathbed.
Once you get past some of the Christian dogma through which Julian interprets her experience, including at times quite a lot of blood and Passion imagery worthy of a Mel Gibson movie 😅, the revelations begin. And then you hear the voice. A tone that feels surprisingly familiar to an ACIM student.
At several points, the revelations seem to challenge Julian’s own expectations or understanding, rather than simply confirming what she already believed. And yet, she accepts them gladly.
A few passages in particular made me stop and think. I’ve rendered some of the ones that struck me most in modern English to make them easier to read.
For example, when Julian is struggling with sin and wondering why God allowed it to happen, she is shown something about the nature of sin:
“But I did not see sin, because I understood that it had no substance and no part in being.”
She then reports Jesus saying:
“All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.”
What struck me even more is how Julian describes the tone in which these words were given to her:
“These words were spoken very tenderly, showing no kind of blame toward me, nor toward anyone who will be saved.”
Then there are passages like this one that made me think about our true identity:
“There is a divine will in the higher part of us, and it is so good that it can never ultimately will evil, but only good.”
And later:
“In this wonder, he sees his God, his Lord, his Maker, so high, so great, and so good, that the creature can hardly think of itself as anything at all. Yet the brightness and clarity of truth and wisdom make him see and understand that he was made for love, and that in this love God keeps him forever.”
And then there are the passages where the voice speaks directly about its love for us. These are perhaps the ones that moved me most.
“My dear darling, I am glad that you have come to me in all your suffering. I have always been with you. And now you see me loving you, and we are one in bliss.”
“Let me be, my dear worthy child. Turn your attention to me. I am enough for you. Enjoy your Savior and your salvation.”
And finally:
“Look how I love you. Behold and see your Lord, your God, your Maker, and your endless joy. See your own brother, your Savior, my child. Behold and see what joy and bliss I have in your salvation.”
I’m just halfway through the book, so I’m not drawing any big conclusions from this. I just find the parallels with the voice of the Course hard to ignore. But more than anything, I find it remarkable to encounter this portrayal of a deeply loving, non-condemning God in a mystical text from the late Middle Ages.