u/PercentageComplex547

Guten Morgen,

Ich suche nach einem Nachfolger für mein Einsteiger Trek Domane Al 4 Gen 4. Ich hatte mir das Rad damals geholt, weil ich testen wollte, ob Rennradfahren was für mich ist.
Ich bin dem Thema komplett verfallen und schaue langsam nach einem Nachfolger.

Ich fahre ca 4.000 km im Jahr, Leipziger Region (also eher flach) und meistens kürzere Runden, da Kinder. Aber auch ab und zu mal 70-120 km.

Ich habe erst mit einem Wilier Filante SLR geliebäugelt, dann aber feststellen müssen, dass das zwar geil aussieht, aber totaler Overkill ist. Brauche ich gar nicht.

Was ich mir wünsche:

- Rahmen & Gabel & Laufräder Carbon, gern mit Aero-Optik
- Rahmen Endurance, Tendenz zu Aero, aber tendenziell lieber etwas bequemer
- elektronische Schaltung
- geile Optik, ich mag zB ein knalliges Blau oder, was mich ja bekommen hat, einen Perleffekt wie beim Wilier Filante Lunar Grey

Ich finde es unglaublich schwierig etwas zu finden, was mir gefällt. Der Orbea Orca MyO ist irgendwie nicht verfügbar, ein BMC Roadmachine kostet in dem geilen türkis zu viel.

Ich würde ungern bei über 6k laden. Da es ein Jobrad wird, ist es kein Weltuntergang für etwas mehr, aber tendenziell 3-4 k, lieber noch ein Upgrade dazunehmen.

Kommt euch was in den Kopf? Gern mit Link :)
Vielen lieben Dank! ❤️

Hey everyone,
I wanted to check if I’m the only one experiencing this or if Apple quietly fixed something in the background.
For the past few months, the battery life on my Series 10 was honestly pretty terrible. I use it for sleep tracking, so I’d fully charge it around 11:30 PM. By 6:00 PM the next evening, it would already be down to 10%—even without any heavy workouts. It was super annoying because I had to charge it twice a day just to get through a full 24-hour cycle.
But yesterday and today? Complete night and day difference.
Charged it to 100% at 11:30 PM last night. Wore it to track my sleep, woke up at 6:00 AM, and have had the Always-On Display active all day. Right now, it’s mid-afternoon and I’m still sitting comfortably at 51%! Last night I ended the day at 22:30 with over 30 % left! At this rate, I’ll easily make it to bedtime without any anxiety.
Two weeks ago, this would have been absolutely impossible.
Just to clarify: I am on watchOS 26.5, NOT the watchOS 27 Beta. Did anyone else notice a sudden jump in efficiency over the last few days, or did my watch just finally recover from a rogue background process?

I just watched the Apple Keynote. Since Siri AI is not coming to Europe — would it be possible to get Bevel AI on the watch? It would be super handy to log something, even if it needs modification afterwards.
I use the watch app so much. I would also love it to 1:1 reflect the front page of bevel, which it only does in unmodified form.

I can’t wait for the next updates haha :D
Thanks guys!

Hi everyone,

I’ve been testing the new Bevel 3.0 update, and I’ve noticed a significant difference in performance when it comes to tracking nutrition via photos.

First of all, I love love love the update. Bevel is now my most used app and I lost 12 kg because of it so far. Very impressed with the app. However for food tracking I find there are still some barriers that I’d have liked to resolve. I have some ideas, so if you need feedback (not really feature requests), let me know @bevel feature owner :) just send a DM.

When I use the "Quick Add" feature (the plus button -> camera), the results are noticeably less accurate compared to when I use the AI-powered search/chat directly. It feels like the "Quick Add" photo scanner is still running on an older, less capable algorithm, while the main AI tool has access to the newer, much more intelligent system.

My main question/concern:
Why are these two methods separated, and why does the "Quick Add" feature not seem to benefit from the new AI engine?
From a UX perspective, it’s a bit frustrating. The "Quick Add" button is the fastest way to log a meal on the go. However, to get accurate data, I’m currently forced to go into the AI chat, upload the photo there, describe the meal, and wait for it to process. It adds quite a few extra steps to a process that could be seamless.

If I am a Pro subscriber, shouldn’t the app automatically route the "Quick Add" photo through the superior AI engine? It seems like a simple "check" to see if the user has a Pro subscription and then apply the better tech across all entry points.

Is my assumption correct that these are two different underlying systems? And if so, is there a technical reason why the faster "Quick Add" can’t be updated to use the same logic as the AI search?

I love the progress in 3.0, but this inconsistency is making my daily logging process feel unnecessarily complicated. Would love to hear if others are experiencing the same thing or if I’m missing a setting!

Thank you! 😊