
u/Perfect_Chicken16

Manisha Koirala in Heeramandi reminds me of Meena Kumari
i just watched these series and was blown away by Manisha Koirala. What grace, voice, dialogue delivery, expressions and acting 🤌
What a comeback, that too after fighting cancer 🫡
i read that she was going to do a biopic on Meena Kumari at one time. It would have been a perfect casting
Hrithik and Saba spotted at movie theater. Put an end to fake rumors
Happy Independence Day to all Indians. Except Kangana
When your only identity is Hrithik Roshan's Ex Wife's Boyfriend
The real reasons why Kangana could never prove her "affair" with Hrithik
Let us look at the confusing and controversial Dating timelines of Kangana:
2004: Ricky Mann
2005-2008: Aditya Pancholi.
2008-2009: Adhyayan Suman. He claims he was mentally and physically abused during the relationship
2009-2013: This timeline is confusing as she was publicly involved with three persons during the same timeline
Ajay Devgan
Nicholas Lafferty
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIoepGY9OYE
Salman Khan
https://www.reddit.com/r/BollyBlindsNGossip/s/dQUR9D3I89
Cut to Year 2016
In year 2016, she gets hit with a legal notice from Hrithik for Two years of Stalking, harassment and spreading Fake claims in media from "affair to paris engagement to claiming he removed her from nonexistent film".
She tried to cover up her stalking & lies by playing victim card, woman card, outsider card and backdating the whole timeline and claiming "7 years of affair".
But, she could not provide even a single proof of her affair or paris engagement. No phone records,messages, private pics, engagement pics, nothing.
Bcoz she was way too busy during that timeline with others. She hid her phone,laptop, passport from cops. Hrithik submits all his devices, phone records, his passport proved that he didnt even leave India during that timeline of "Paris engagement" that she claimed.
Meanwhile, here are some of the crazy mails (she sent 5000+ mails btw) she sent to the newly single Hrithik that busted her "affair" claims. Where she is begging him for first kiss, first date, etc. She even threatened to scar him in one of her mails.
Oh she first put Fake articles abt doing Aashiqui 3 with Hrithik for cheap publicity.
He denied even doing the film https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tr3ClAhqbkc
Later, she spread rumors that she was dropped by Hrithik from Aashiqui 3. And does a PR interview with a planted question abt the rumors that Hrithik dropped you from the film.
To which, she says "Exes do silly things for your attention" leading to huge media speculation that Kangana claims "Hrithik is her ex, did they date"etc.
After two years of stalking, harassment and unwanted attention that he was tolerating silently, Hrithik had enough and said "there are more chances of him dating Pope than any of the women the media keeps linking him to".
By the way, that film Aashiqui 3 was not even in production. It is going to be released only in 2027.
Kangana's favorite T-shirt from 2016
Even with all the de-aging, Ranbir looks more like Janak in the scenes with Sai Pallavi. Where is the chemistry?
This is not Valmiki's Ramayana. The makers are creating their own version to suit Modern/ Western audiences
The lack of avagunthana and the modern saree, blouse styling and hairstyle is totally inauthentic. Even the way the saree is worn is like they are in 2026
Sita was strong but not a warrior as per Valmiki's Ramayana. She was a gentle queen.
In the Lakshman Rekha scene, she is shown taking out her sword in the trailer but there is no such thing mentioned in Valmiki's Ramayana. She only gives verbal and emotional threats
Even worse, in the trailer, Sita teases Ram abt Surpanaka "woh aap pe mohit ho gayi hai". As per the Epic, only Ram and Lakshman tease Surpanakha. Sita was not even in the picture.
i think the makers are messing with the Epic to suit western audiences.
This is not Valmiki's Ramayan. They have changed the entire character of Sita to appeal to Western audiences
The lack of avagunthana, the modern saree and hairstyle is totally inauthentic
Sita was strong but not a warrior as per Valmiki's Ramayana. She was a gentle queen.
In the Lakshman Rekha scene, she is shown taking out her sword but there is no such thing mentioned in Valmiki's Ramayana.
Even worse, Sita saying to Ram abt Surpanaka "woh aap pe mohit ho gayi hai". As per the Epic, only Ram and Lakshman tease Surpanakha. Sita was not even in the picture.
i think the makers are messing with the Epic to suit western audiences.