How much should be the first attempt IOQM first pass solve rate? I have roughly correctly attempted 50% of Number Theory, 40 % of Algebra and 40% of Combinatorics on first pass. Geometry pending. This percentage is based on the number of questions not by marks weightage (2/3/5). So 50%of Number Theory means some questions of 2 marks, some of 3 marks and some of 5 marks.
For IOQM 2026, eligible students (born Aug 1, 2007 – Jul 31, 2014; Classes 8–12) are currently split into Group A (Classes 8–11) and Group B (Class 12 only).
That means a 13-year-old in Class 8 is competing for the same cutoff as a 17-year-old in Class 11 who's had years more Olympiad training. We think a fairer split would be Group A (Classes 8–10) and Group B (Classes 11–12).
Why this matters:
If you agree, please personalize and send this to HBCSE (don't just copy-paste verbatim — a flood of identical emails is easy to ignore, slightly different wording carries more weight):
Subject: Representation Regarding Category Regrouping for IOQM 2026 (Proposal: Group A – Classes 8–10, Group B – Classes 11–12)
Dear Respected Committee Members,
I am writing to request reconsideration of the participant grouping for IOQM 2026. Currently, Group A spans Classes 8–11 and Group B is Class 12 only. I propose restructuring this into Group A (Classes 8–10) and Group B (Classes 11–12).
This change would give junior contestants (Classes 8–10) a realistic, attainable cutoff at the IOQM and subsequent RMO stage, rather than one effectively set by Class 11 students with several more years of preparation. It would also support HBCSE's own efforts to widen Olympiad participation, give HBCSE/MTA a longer mentorship runway for identifying future IMO talent, help retain junior students against later JEE/board pressure, and bring IOQM's structure in line with international practice (e.g., AMC 8/10/12, UKMT tiers).
Thank you for considering this change to support young mathematical talent across India.
Sincerely, [Your Name]
Feel free to add your own reasoning too — the more varied and genuine the emails, the more likely this gets taken seriously.
For IOQM 2026, eligible students (born Aug 1, 2007 – Jul 31, 2014; Classes 8–12) are currently split into Group A (Classes 8–11) and Group B (Class 12 only).
That means a 13-year-old in Class 8 is competing for the same cutoff as a 17-year-old in Class 11 who's had years more Olympiad training. We think a fairer split would be Group A (Classes 8–10) and Group B (Classes 11–12).
Why this matters:
If you agree, please personalize and send this to HBCSE (don't just copy-paste verbatim — a flood of identical emails is easy to ignore, slightly different wording carries more weight):
Subject: Representation Regarding Category Regrouping for IOQM 2026 (Proposal: Group A – Classes 8–10, Group B – Classes 11–12)
Dear Respected Committee Members,
I am writing to request reconsideration of the participant grouping for IOQM 2026. Currently, Group A spans Classes 8–11 and Group B is Class 12 only. I propose restructuring this into Group A (Classes 8–10) and Group B (Classes 11–12).
This change would give junior contestants (Classes 8–10) a realistic, attainable cutoff at the IOQM and subsequent RMO stage, rather than one effectively set by Class 11 students with several more years of preparation. It would also support HBCSE's own efforts to widen Olympiad participation, give HBCSE/MTA a longer mentorship runway for identifying future IMO talent, help retain junior students against later JEE/board pressure, and bring IOQM's structure in line with international practice (e.g., AMC 8/10/12, UKMT tiers).
Thank you for considering this change to support young mathematical talent across India.
Sincerely, [Your Name]
Feel free to add your own reasoning too — the more varied and genuine the emails, the more likely this gets taken seriously.
For IOQM 2026, eligible students (born Aug 1, 2007 – Jul 31, 2014; Classes 8–12) are currently split into Group A (Classes 8–11) and Group B (Class 12 only).
That means a 13-year-old in Class 8 is competing for the same cutoff as a 17-year-old in Class 11 who's had years more Olympiad training. We think a fairer split would be Group A (Classes 8–10) and Group B (Classes 11–12).
Why this matters:
If you agree, please personalize and send this to HBCSE (don't just copy-paste verbatim — a flood of identical emails is easy to ignore, slightly different wording carries more weight):
Subject: Representation Regarding Category Regrouping for IOQM 2026 (Proposal: Group A – Classes 8–10, Group B – Classes 11–12)
Dear Respected Committee Members,
I am writing to request reconsideration of the participant grouping for IOQM 2026. Currently, Group A spans Classes 8–11 and Group B is Class 12 only. I propose restructuring this into Group A (Classes 8–10) and Group B (Classes 11–12).
This change would give junior contestants (Classes 8–10) a realistic, attainable cutoff at the IOQM and subsequent RMO stage, rather than one effectively set by Class 11 students with several more years of preparation. It would also support HBCSE's own efforts to widen Olympiad participation, give HBCSE/MTA a longer mentorship runway for identifying future IMO talent, help retain junior students against later JEE/board pressure, and bring IOQM's structure in line with international practice (e.g., AMC 8/10/12, UKMT tiers).
Thank you for considering this change to support young mathematical talent across India.
Sincerely, [Your Name]
Feel free to add your own reasoning too — the more varied and genuine the emails, the more likely this gets taken seriously.
How much should be the solve rate initially for solving IOQM PYQs for the first time for 2 markers, for 3 markers and for 5 markers ( What percentage of questions should be correct for the first time attempt)?
What does it mean - some centers are showing seats 0/0?
Can someone please help with which chapters of David Burton - Elementary Number Theory are required for RMO?
Very shameful of MC Sir to use this student movement to promote his book. Very opportunistic. This moment is of the students. Not book/ coaching promotion by showing photo editing skills. I had very high regards for MC Sir but this is not right. One may agree or disagree with CJP but no one should have the right to use someone's distress to sell and make profits.
@mods Do not delete this post. This is neither political nor promotion of any coaching.
So where has your preparation reached? E.g. Algebra/ Combi/ NT/ Geo Theory completion; No. of PYQs attempted; etc. Drop your current class and preparation status.
Which one should I buy? Does anyone of them has 2 marks type questions?
Also just need to confirm if the following are included in them:
- Solutions to exercises (not just answers)
- PYQs with solutions
Looking to buy IOQM module from Allen E-Store. Can anyone help with discount codes?
There are many IOQM Workshops starting these days. Which institute's workshop should one join? Is it better to join online mode or offline mode workshop? Any other considerations?