u/Professional-Tale67

I’m 15 years old and currently in my first year of high school. I’m definitely not advanced enough in math or physics to properly formalize this idea, so I’m sure there are probably some big gaps in my reasoning, and maybe even some fundamental mistakes.
I came up with this while thinking about quantum entanglement. I’m posting it here mostly because I want people to point out what’s wrong with it. If the idea doesn’t work, I’d actually like to know exactly where it breaks. So feel free to “destroy” it.
I’m not claiming that this is a new theory or that I’ve discovered anything. It’s just an idea I had and I’m trying to understand whether there’s anything interesting in it or if I’m completely misunderstanding something.
My idea
When two electrons are entangled, their spins can be measured with opposite results, even if the particles are very far apart.
I started wondering if this could be explained by imagining that the two particles are somehow two sides or manifestations of a single physical entity.
Instead of thinking of them as two completely separate objects that somehow have a connection between them, maybe they could still be connected at a more fundamental level, even when they are very far apart from our point of view.
I was thinking about something vaguely similar to spacetime curvature, but obviously much more extreme. The idea would be that the two particles could be separated in the three dimensions we experience, while somehow being connected or even coincident in a deeper structure of spacetime.
This made me think about an additional spatial dimension.
Normally, we describe space using:
(x, y, z)
But what if there were another spatial dimension, so that space was:
(w, x, y, z)
with time being another coordinate:
t
In this picture, two particles could have the same or a very similar w coordinate while being extremely far apart in x, y and z.
From our three-dimensional perspective, they would look like two separate particles very far from each other. But in the full four-dimensional spatial structure, they might be much closer together, or somehow connected.
If something like this were possible, the particles wouldn’t actually need to send information to each other faster than light. The apparent non-locality of entanglement could instead come from the fact that we are only seeing three of the spatial dimensions.
Problems I already see
There are obviously a lot of things I don’t know how to explain:
Elementary particles probably wouldn’t produce anywhere near enough gravity to create the kind of extreme spacetime curvature I’m imagining.
I don’t know why this kind of connection would appear specifically when particles become entangled.
I have no idea how two particles would actually create or interact with a fourth spatial dimension.
I don’t have the mathematical background to describe this properly yet.
I have no idea whether this kind of geometry could actually reproduce the correlations predicted by quantum mechanics.
Most importantly, I don’t know whether this idea would actually be compatible with Bell’s theorem and the no-signalling principle.
So, basically, this is just a thought I had, not a finished theory.
If there’s an obvious reason why this can’t work, I’d genuinely like to know. And if there’s already a known theory or interpretation of quantum mechanics that is similar to what I’m describing, I’d also be interested in hearing about it.

Ho 15 anni e sono al primo anno delle superiori. Non ho di sicuro una preparazione in matematica o fisica sufficiente per formalizzare correttamente questa idea, quindi sono sicuro che ci siano delle grandi nel mio ragionamento, e forse anche degli errori fondamentali.

Ho elaborato questa teoria pensando all'entanglement la scorsa notte. La pubblico qui principalmente perché vorrei che qualcuno mi facesse notare cosa c'è di sbagliato. Se l'idea non funziona, vorrei sapere esattamente dove si verifica l'errore. Quindi sentitevi liberi di distruggerla

La mia idea

Quando due elettroni sono entangled, i loro spin possono essere misurati con risultati opposti, anche se le particelle sono molto distanti tra loro.

Ho iniziato a chiedermi se questo potesse essere spiegato immaginando che le due particelle siano in qualche modo due lati o manifestazioni di un'unica entità fisica.

Invece di considerarle come due oggetti completamente separati che in qualche modo hanno una connessione tra loro, forse potrebbero comunque essere connesse a un livello più fondamentale, anche quando sono molto distanti dal nostro punto di vista.
Stavo pensando a qualcosa di vagamente simile alla curvatura dello spaziotempo, ma ovviamente molto più estremo. L'idea sarebbe che le due particelle potrebbero essere separate nelle tre dimensioni che percepiamo, pur essendo in qualche modo connesse o addirittura coincidenti in una struttura più profonda dello spaziotempo.

Questo mi ha fatto pensare a una dimensione spaziale aggiuntiva.

Normalmente, descriviamo lo spazio usando:
(x, y, z)
Ma cosa succederebbe se ci fosse un'altra dimensione spaziale, in modo che lo spazio fosse:
(w, x, y, z)
con il tempo come un'altra coordinata:
t
In questa immagine, due particelle potrebbero avere la stessa coordinata w o una molto simile pur essendo estremamente distanti in x, y e z.

Dalla nostra prospettiva tridimensionale, sembrerebbero due particelle separate, molto distanti tra loro. Ma nella struttura spaziale quadridimensionale completa, potrebbero essere molto più vicine, o in qualche modo connesse.

Se una cosa del genere fosse possibile, le particelle non avrebbero bisogno di scambiarsi informazioni a velocità superiore a quella della luce. L'apparente non-località dell'entanglement potrebbe invece derivare dal fatto che osserviamo solo tre dimensioni spaziali.
Problemi che già riscontro
Ovviamente ci sono molte cose che non so spiegare:
Le particelle elementari probabilmente non produrrebbero una gravità sufficiente a creare il tipo di curvatura spazio-temporale estrema che sto immaginando.

Non so perché questo tipo di connessione dovrebbe apparire specificamente quando le particelle si intrecciano.
Non ho idea di come due particelle potrebbero effettivamente creare o interagire con una quarta dimensione spaziale.
Non ho ancora le competenze matematiche per descriverlo correttamente.
Non ho idea se questo tipo di geometria potrebbe effettivamente riprodurre le correlazioni previste dalla meccanica quantistica.

La cosa più importante è che non so se questa idea sia effettivamente compatibile con il teorema di Bell e il principio di non segnalazione.
Quindi, in sostanza, si tratta solo di un'idea che mi è venuta in mente, non di una teoria completa.
Se esiste una ragione evidente per cui questo non può funzionare, mi piacerebbe davvero saperla. E se esiste già una teoria o un'interpretazione nota della meccanica quantistica simile a quella che sto descrivendo, sarei interessato a conoscerla.

I’m 15 years old and currently in my first year of high school. I don’t have the mathematical background to properly formalize this idea, so I know there are probably major gaps or even fundamental mistakes in it.
I came up with this idea while thinking about quantum entanglement, and I’m posting it here specifically because I want people to find its weaknesses and, if possible, “destroy” it. I’m not claiming that this is a new theory or that it is correct. I would genuinely like to know where and why it fails.
My hypothesis
The spin of two entangled electrons can be measured as opposite, regardless of the distance separating them. This could happen if the two particles were, in some way, the positive and negative aspects of a single entity.
Even if they were extremely far apart, they could still belong to the same exact point at a more fundamental level, through some kind of space-time overlap.
This overlap could be compared to a curvature of spacetime, but much more extreme, such that the two particles could coincide at a more fundamental level while still appearing, from our perspective, to occupy two different positions.
In this way, the correlation between their spins would not require information to travel from one particle to the other. Instead, the two particles would simply be two manifestations of the same physical entity.
I then thought about this in terms of an additional spatial dimension. Instead of describing space as only
(x,y,z)
I am imagining a space with four physical spatial dimensions:
(w,x,y,z)
plus time:
t
In this idea, the two particles could have the same w coordinate, while having different x,y,z coordinates.
So, from our three-dimensional perspective, they could be extremely far apart, while in the full four-dimensional spatial structure they could be connected or even coincide along the w dimension.
If this were the case, the particles would not need to communicate with each other faster than light. The apparent non-locality would instead result from the fact that we are only observing three of the four spatial dimensions.
Problems I can already see
Elementary particles probably cannot generate enough gravity to curve spacetime to such an extreme degree.
I don’t yet understand why this connection would occur specifically when particles become entangled.
I don’t know how two particles could produce or create such a connection in a fourth spatial dimension.
I have no mathematical formulation for this idea yet.
I don’t know whether such a geometry could actually reproduce the correlations predicted by quantum mechanics.
I don’t know whether this idea is compatible with Bell’s theorem and the no-signalling principle.

I’m 15 years old and currently in my first year of high school. I’m definitely not advanced enough in math or physics to properly formalize this idea, so I’m sure there are probably some big gaps in my reasoning, and maybe even some fundamental mistakes.
I came up with this while thinking about quantum entanglement. I’m posting it here mostly because I want people to point out what’s wrong with it. If the idea doesn’t work, I’d actually like to know exactly where it breaks. So feel free to “destroy” it.
I’m not claiming that this is a new theory or that I’ve discovered anything. It’s just an idea I had and I’m trying to understand whether there’s anything interesting in it or if I’m completely misunderstanding something.
My idea
When two electrons are entangled, their spins can be measured with opposite results, even if the particles are very far apart.
I started wondering if this could be explained by imagining that the two particles are somehow two sides or manifestations of a single physical entity.
Instead of thinking of them as two completely separate objects that somehow have a connection between them, maybe they could still be connected at a more fundamental level, even when they are very far apart from our point of view.
I was thinking about something vaguely similar to spacetime curvature, but obviously much more extreme. The idea would be that the two particles could be separated in the three dimensions we experience, while somehow being connected or even coincident in a deeper structure of spacetime.
This made me think about an additional spatial dimension.
Normally, we describe space using:
(x, y, z)
But what if there were another spatial dimension, so that space was:
(w, x, y, z)
with time being another coordinate:
t
In this picture, two particles could have the same or a very similar w coordinate while being extremely far apart in x, y and z.
From our three-dimensional perspective, they would look like two separate particles very far from each other. But in the full four-dimensional spatial structure, they might be much closer together, or somehow connected.
If something like this were possible, the particles wouldn’t actually need to send information to each other faster than light. The apparent non-locality of entanglement could instead come from the fact that we are only seeing three of the spatial dimensions.
Problems I already see
There are obviously a lot of things I don’t know how to explain:
Elementary particles probably wouldn’t produce anywhere near enough gravity to create the kind of extreme spacetime curvature I’m imagining.
I don’t know why this kind of connection would appear specifically when particles become entangled.
I have no idea how two particles would actually create or interact with a fourth spatial dimension.
I don’t have the mathematical background to describe this properly yet.
I have no idea whether this kind of geometry could actually reproduce the correlations predicted by quantum mechanics.
Most importantly, I don’t know whether this idea would actually be compatible with Bell’s theorem and the no-signalling principle.
So, basically, this is just a thought I had, not a finished theory.
If there’s an obvious reason why this can’t work, I’d genuinely like to know. And if there’s already a known theory or interpretation of quantum mechanics that is similar to what I’m describing, I’d also be interested in hearing about it.

I'm searching for a site of free streaming where i can dowload easly the film also in italian; I tried many site but they don't work or the download is only in english, can someone help me?

I recently played Hollow Knight on PC and really enjoyed it, so now I'm looking for something similar on PS4.

My PC isn't that great, so I can't run many games properly, which is why I'm thinking about getting something for console. I have a €20 PSN gift card and would rather use it for a proper game than for in-game content like Rocket League.

I don't like Souls-style games (they're not my thing) and I'm not looking for anything too challenging. Just something fun and engaging that I can really get into.

Do you have any suggestions?

If the game isn't like Hollow Knight but is a masterpiece, I'll take it.

I recently played Hollow Knight on PC and really enjoyed it, so now I'm looking for something similar on PS4.

My PC isn't that great, so I can't run many games properly, which is why I'm thinking about getting something for console. I have a €20 PSN gift card and would rather use it for a proper game than for in-game content like Rocket League.

I don't like Souls-style games (they're not my thing) and I'm not looking for anything too challenging. Just something fun and engaging that I can really get into.

Do you have any suggestions?

If the game isn't like Hollow Knight but is a masterpiece, I'll take it.

I’ve been playing Hollow Knight on PC lately and it really clicked with me, so now I’m looking for something similar on PS4.

My PC isn’t great, so I can’t run a lot of games properly, which is why I’m thinking of getting something on console instead. I’ve got a 20€ PSN gift card and I’d rather use it on an actual game instead of in-game stuff like Rocket League.

I’m not into Souls-like games (just not my thing), and I’m not looking for anything super hardcore. Just something fun and engaging that I can really get into.

Any recommendations?

if the game isn't like holloe knight but is a "masterpiece" i accept it