▲ 37 r/casiomods
My first practice run.
My first practice run. Quite happy how it turned out.
I learned a lot, like, don’t try removing the non-existent protection layer of the double sided 3M Scotch tape.
u/RaGaMiUr — 23 hours ago
▲ 147 r/gshock
It is hot in Europe
It is hot in Europe and every little bit helps.
This morning I remembered that my father, who did physical work, sometimes tied a handkerchief around his wrist during the hot summers. That inspired me to give it a try myself. I found an old handkerchief, dampened it, and used my watch to attach it to my wrist. It sits more comfortably than I expected and does exactly what it is supposed to do.
When it is dry, you can simply hold it in the pool or under the tap. The watch (GA-B2100CD-1A4) doesn't mind at all :)
u/RaGaMiUr — 13 days ago
▲ 27 r/Colouring
I think this group really needs a clear stand on AI generated work.
To be clear: I am not against AI generated work, as such. I think it is fine to use AI in your workflow as inspiration or as an assistant while adding your own touch. And with that I think I have already a more liberal view than most on AI generated work!
However, I think it is not okay to put out some AI generated work while claiming a) it is your work and b) it was not AI generated. This is just dishonesty and in general we (in this subreddit) don’t like to be lied to or taken advantage of.
Unfortunately, there is no rule (yet) that says one should clearly state something is AI generated. Rule no 1 is: be nice, but how civil is it when a poster tries to fool the audience?
But pointing out the AI tell-tales puts one immediately in the mod’s crosshairs and many comments were already removed. But is this being nice? I would say: fair is nice!
Please add a rule that makes it mandatory for the poster to be clear if the image was AI generated or not.
u/RaGaMiUr — 2 months ago