Neve 31102vs NoiseAsh NEED 31102
With very much effort to avoid the ongoing preamp wars and the gentleman who sparked them, I wanted to ask about a parallel piece of gear and the authenticity of its plugin recreation.
NoiseAsh has for a few years created lots of Neve emulations, and every plugin company that tries to make their own Neve emulation seems to fall short. However, I recently have been doing some research in order to tamp down my workflow by using a channel strip for initial saturation, EQ, and channel control (L/R, M/S balancing) stages, all of which were included in NoiseAsh's take on the 31102.
The NEED 31102 came up pretty late in this search, but the demos sounded closer to what I generally want and so I tested the demo myself. Especially enticing were some of the extra features like the extra mid band and channel controls. I already have the Scheps OmniChannel, which is powerful and versatile in its own right but has a particular character between the preamps and (colored) compressors which I think suit Alan's style, workflow, and clients more than my current projects.
Now I want to know: does the NEED 31102 hold up compared to the original Neve 31102 channel strip, and would you use this as a basic channel strip like we would in a desk workflow?
Testing the demo on a 100 Hz around -12dB input some wave and an instrumental track by the Hoops McCann Band, I was able to find some basic behaviors such as the harmonic saturation pattern and the general EQ curves.
Harmonic distortion is always engaged, no true bypass for the plugin. With the plugin engaged and the preamp off there is subtle added movement across the spectrum with a bump below 100 Hz. Then, of course factoring gain staging still, the preamp engages and adds subtle odd order harmonics which gain with subtle movement underneath until about +40. After this point, a new saturation stage kicks in in addition to the odd order harmonics. With the fundamental at 100 Hz, those standalone harmonics end at 4k and a block of higher frequencies enter and hit the ceiling, but in a way that doesn't crackle or hurt the ears. This upper bloc of preamp harmonics featured dips at 5.2k, 5.4k, and 6.2k, rolling off above 6.2 kHz with minor imperfections.
To my ears this sounds great and the preamp section features an auto gain button which reduced gain dramatically to within 0.3 dB. I just don't know how faithful it sounds and I was curious. Kudos the NoiseAsh. I would only ask that the preamp on/off doesn't pop every time I hit it.
Now onto the EQ. Obviously there is an extra band with an extra hi-q button, and the labelled frequencies are correect. I do not know whether the EQ curves in either are old-school style (proportional/gain-dependent Q), nor if the frequencies and hi-q settings are correctly centered on the labelled frequencies on either software or hardware. I would have to assume the Neve unit has proportional Q but maybe the plugin doesn't?
With a 20dB range on each of the four bands this is a pleasant and powerful EQ for tastefully shaping signals. Previously there were complaints about harshness in the 50+ pre range and/or when boosting hard above 7k or so (LOL of course). I found during testing that all the gain knobs do a lot of nice subtle shaping below +5 and kick in progressively until maybe +8.5, giving lots of smooth gradation with just enough extra to push any band to the limit without hurting your ears at all.
The channel faders are clean, the VUs center on about -16 instead of -18dB iirc, and the channel control section includes a nice button scheme and mid/side balance knob. Bonus points to NoiseAsh for adding effectively an entire second EQ section for the side image when M/S is engaged. Of course this is all new stuff and it's not meant to be faithful but to add onto the original.
The "dirt" switch did absolutely nothing on either source, and it seemed to ignore me.
It seems like no one has analyzed this plugin and compared it to a real 31102, but if it's faithful to the original EQ frequencies and curves and the distortion can pass a smell test, I will gladly pay to run everything through it. It sounds pretty good to me whether or not, but let me know what you think. Does NEED 31102 sound bad to you? Does it nail or fail the hardware sound/functions or add upon them gracefully? Do you love it and wish it had a compressor like the Voosteq Model N? Have you owned the real deal and tested them? Drop a comment.
TL;DR: Is the NoiseAsh NEED 31102 really an improved yet faithful recreation of the 31102 channel strip, or is it snake oil for $60?