u/Red_Blooded_Male_123

This reviewer thinks it wasn't very good. Having read the Excerpts of this book that have been posted online this isn't even all of the ludicrous claims she makes.

I wonder was it Jennifer or Lorraine wrote this one?

Source: public social media. Reading book reviews is not a criminal offence at time of posting.

8 professionals "stalked her" but she no longer claims they met on tattle.

Back to saying she felt suicidal not that she attempted suicide which she claimed in the Mirror

Says she was sent copies of WhatsApp voice notes, which is different to saying she was sent recordings of the zoom calls

Includes Facebook and twitter as the mediums for the stalking which is a nice change

Clearly talks about Sally Ann again but still denies using her story of sexual abuse without her consent.

https://archive.is/REXPi

And someone called littlebrownUK

taken from X , SB has not confirmed this - nor has he denied it.

Does this explain Dr Jess' weird spiral about missing books and then suggesting SB is against free speech?

Is it a wild goose chase with no basis in fact?

Answers on a post card or via hacked ring doorbells. All else fails hum through your dishwasher whilst gargling red wine.

Says producers lied to his former neighbours claiming it was a vegan podcast.

Doorstepped his elderly parents, filmed them in their car and opening their door - in full knowledge that SB doesn't live in the UK and that the website is nothing to do with two elderly people.

Says they glossed over the fact the Sands case was thrown out. Doesn't sound like he got a right of reply.

Says there is still an open question over who passed his parents address to the papers. And over who posted about the case on Reddit including details of his bank accounts and threats against his parents and young neices. Says all that will be discussed by him in due course (this last point is not strictly related to the doc but Is in the statement)

All in truly shocking carry in by so called journalists representing the BBC. No wonder it's not being broadcast save on digital media.

Source: Tattle.Life

A man with an intellectual disability made threats in the YouTube comment section against the Ingham and Saccone Joly families.

The man was tracked down by police based on his YouTube comments.

Sarah Ingham tells Jess Taylor she is being stalked online. With no evidence Jess repeats this claim but embellished it to be the second of it's kind involving the prosecution of a Tattlers (again, the threats were made on YouTube)

Court documents here show no reference to Tattle at all'

https://opencourtdata.uk/criminal/case/1182492117687059220

A news article on the case also indicates this was a YouTube issue https://courtnewsuk.co.uk/let-off-for-stalker-who-threatened-to-kill-youtuber-family/

(Behind paywall but screenshot by Yel.)

The absolute best part is Chris Ingham claimed to his legal team that he left the country because of the stalking and lost brand deals as a result.

Fair fucks to the defendants legal team who wasted no time pointing out he lost brand deals after sending sexts to a 16 year old child and left the country to avoid his tax bill 🤣 and this is now on the public record 🤣

Man got a suspended sentence. Again YouTube.

https://archive.ph/XQTWA

Similar to the Times interview but with new details she doesn't seem to have mentioned before that I can see, including at Westminster last year.

Zoom calls and WhatsApp groups were created.

She didn't just feel suicidal, says she attempted suicide in September 2022.

Says an online stalker came to one of her events, put her hands inside her underwear and said "I've always wanted to do that". No mention In the article of reporting this in broad daylight sexual assault to the police or of charges being brought.

Retells the story that holiday snaps were taken off her public Instagram and sold for money to people who had acess to her public Instagram to complain.

The Mirror say Jess has asked them not to name her stalkers.

Source: online news outlet

Dr Jess book is out and it mentions tattle 41 times and mentions mumsnet 0 times so it seems clear she at least wants people to believe her stalking stories all relate to tattle.

She tells a story about a publicly/online planned plot to attack her at her 2022 book launch. It's a dramatic tale involving a ploy to avoid arrest using...er fake names to book the tickets?

Jess has 3 (or was it 2? She forgets and uses both) plain clothes undercover officers there who can only tell her she's safe "for now" having looked for rogue tattlers wearing Groucho Marx glasses in the bogs and under every seat.

Took Tattlers this evening all of about two seconds to figure out she didn't have a thread on tattle in 2022 and the thread she references is this fairly benign one from mumsnet where people...well they call her a liar and a fantasist and in fact mostly say they are NOT going to her book launch. I can't think why anyone would think her a liar ...

https://archive.is/ycQjQ

1st 5 pics are excerpts from the book. Last 3 are Tattle detectives

In Jess Taylors latest work of fiction, she claims 8 Tattlers met in her thread , organized over zoom, which was recorded and later sent to her.

​

Claims to have police protection orders against these 8 women, but also says our laws don't cover gang stalking (so how did she get a police protection order?)

​

Claims the order expired and her tattle thread took off again at that point.

​

Earlier claims she made in other interviews about how she was too scared to appear in public have been changed to she *did* appear in public but with private security (presumably after people pointed out the holes in her "couldn't go out in public" stories using photos of her speaking in public).

​

And a bunch of other shit, honestly it's ludicrous....the Times have published it anyway .

Dr Jess Taylor said 7 weeks ago now that initially one, then she upped it to two, police officers who had used tattle to stalk their victims had been convicted.

​

She declared it the first criminal prosecution of a tattler. Her mate Neil chimed in in the comments that more cases were active against tattlers with police forces in Ireland, England and wales.

​

Jess claimed tattle posts had been used as evidence in court. People smarter than Jess pointed out that if the officer pled guilty (as was claimed) then there would've been no trial or need for evidence.

​

Jess claimed that the names of the officers would be released soon, once their victims gave the ok. People smarter than Jess pointed out that's not how court convictions work especially not in public safety or public interest matters - like a bent copper who stalks women. Or two of them.

​

Anyway, I know there's no way Jess would lie or attempt to frighten women off the internet so I assume everything she said was true.

​

Any sign of the names of the officers or which force they were from yet ?

​

​

This clip is coming up on a year old.

Describes rape and death threats as routine (still no proof has ever been shown).

Claims a photo of her grandchild was taken inside her house and posted on the site (neglects to mention the photo was taken inside the house because it was taken by her and posted by her on public social media)

Claims to need security (most liked posts indicate she is mostly mocked for her obsession with SPF)

Claims the police and government are involved (actually, Dr Jess is still keeping that one going bless the daft old bat 😂)

Claims "we will have our day", meaning influencers (anyone know the current status of the Sands v Tattle and Kumquat case today ?)

Claims tattle will be shut down (also nope).

Source: national television.

Here's some interesting posts last year from a Reddit account called Rosegoldwhirlpool.

Claims he's part of a group that hunts tattlers - specifically says he and others share a tattle login so they can screenshot it.

Claims to have tattlers identities and that outing them would ruin their life.

Says he and "others on reddit" are involved in this group.

Seems very wound up about the treatment of the partners of sports people aka WAGs.

Stops posting around September 2025.

The account is still active though - maybe he will come back and tell us if the group is still going ?

https://arctic-shift.photon-reddit.com/search?fun=comments_search&author=Rosegoldwhirlpool&limit=10&sort=desc

He admitted to being in a "don't fuck with cats" style WhatsApp group. Don't fuck with cats is famously about a group of internet sleuths hunting a bad guy. Can we assume it's the same WhatsApp group Liaryn Goodman told the Daily Mail she was in with Tattlers Unmasked and others?

He reposted Sebs photo asking if people knew him, before anyone knew about the court case- similar to Lauryn and Tattlers Unmasked.

And he was balls deep in the attempts to doxx Yel.

But now radio silence ?

Was there a falling out? Has he gone over to the dark side and joined tattle himself, maybe he's on there now ripping the back off the rest of the gang under a hilarious pseudonym like FatTits?

Any other theories ?

https://evebarlow.substack.com/p/the-tyranny-of-online-strangers

However ludicrous the claims in the book are, somehow this review is even more batshit.

Latest comments on the Substack. Kerry Daynes asks to save it in her growing evidence folder.

Is there a critical mass coming of women Jess has tried to weaponise the law against ? (Whilst also telling victims not to report to the police because they will be pathologised, not believed and diagnosed with a mental illness)

The world's biggest bunch of clowns, tattlers unmasked have posted a link to Irish news outlet the journal with wording to suggest that SB had 5m in Bitcoin and implying this is linked to the appeal.

The actual journal article is here - all it actually says is the Sands admit there were legal "technicalities" for the court to decide.

https://www.thejournal.ie/tattle-life-case-7056259-May2026/

The reference to Bitcoin is nowhere online.

And even if he had 5 million or eleventy billion, the fact remains he wasn't served and was deprived of his human right to legally defend himself. Which is why their case was slung out and their first appeal denied.

Anyway, TU remain the worst scum of the universe.

New article in the journal, no new info on what happened that they got granted an appeal

https://www.thejournal.ie/tattle-life-case-7056259-May2026/