r/TattleLife2025

This reviewer thinks it wasn't very good. Having read the Excerpts of this book that have been posted online this isn't even all of the ludicrous claims she makes.

I wonder was it Jennifer or Lorraine wrote this one?

Source: public social media. Reading book reviews is not a criminal offence at time of posting.

A recorded reveal of Jess's interview with the Daily Fail surprised me, well more their actions around the reveal.

Jess's first comment was 'look how long my legs look' her wife following with' you've got long legs'.( she really hasn't)

Her wife then went on with comments such as ' look how cute your are" then." Oh my god your so pretty, I know thats not the point, but your so pretty" After such fawning, I really couldn't be bothered to carry on watching the rest, but the initial comments did raise my eyebrow's from two staunch feminists ( who dislike women of a certain demographic) first impressions of how a woman comes across or looks in such an article, an important topic for them both ( not just financially) and appearance was the initial first thoughts for them.

Feminists will be screaming at them, hiding in their garden ( I don't know if they have a garden, so acquisitions of stalking please).

8 professionals "stalked her" but she no longer claims they met on tattle.

Back to saying she felt suicidal not that she attempted suicide which she claimed in the Mirror

Says she was sent copies of WhatsApp voice notes, which is different to saying she was sent recordings of the zoom calls

Includes Facebook and twitter as the mediums for the stalking which is a nice change

Clearly talks about Sally Ann again but still denies using her story of sexual abuse without her consent.

https://archive.is/REXPi

And someone called littlebrownUK

taken from X , SB has not confirmed this - nor has he denied it.

Does this explain Dr Jess' weird spiral about missing books and then suggesting SB is against free speech?

Is it a wild goose chase with no basis in fact?

Answers on a post card or via hacked ring doorbells. All else fails hum through your dishwasher whilst gargling red wine.

From my previous post I was having a look on SB’s Instagram and the comments are wild. I could understand if you have a thread on Tattle as you’re directly affected. But who are these people?

Are they fans of people they’ve never met and have gone on to a page of someone they don’t know to leave hateful comments? They read a news report, believed every word and then thought they’d go and blast abuse on a stranger’s page? Hmm…

Why is everyone on the side of Tattle the automatic bad guy but those who adore people they’ve never met who are willing to go and give abuse to others the good guys?

I’ve never left negative comments on someone’s social media before, but if I comment on Tattle that Lauryn Goodman is awful for selling “magic fertility beads” or Jess Taylor is dishonest for the things she says, it’s me who is the bad guy? I almost feel sorry for some of them that they are so wilfully blind to the poor behaviour of some influencers.

In the BBC documentary it was referenced that Sebastian was a vegan influencer. It also showed a video expressing annoyance that regular influencers could sell cookbooks purely because it had their face on it. Which is something I could understand if I had a niche and then influencers were able to outsell me purely from their influencer clout.

Since then Jessica Taylor has formed this “failed influencer” narrative which infers that the reason for Tattle is due to SB being unsuccessful as an influencer.

Hold up, I’ve had a look at the reviews on Amazon on his recipe book and he seemed to have sold a decent amount and get some good reviews - in comparison to some of Jessica’s books he overshadows her by a lot. So how are we measuring failure exactly? His Instagram also had a decent following and I recall him talking about brand deals he got which were worth a lot, and it was at this point he felt as though influencing was a con and didn’t feel authentic to him.

The audacity of this grifter knows no bounds!

Says producers lied to his former neighbours claiming it was a vegan podcast.

Doorstepped his elderly parents, filmed them in their car and opening their door - in full knowledge that SB doesn't live in the UK and that the website is nothing to do with two elderly people.

Says they glossed over the fact the Sands case was thrown out. Doesn't sound like he got a right of reply.

Says there is still an open question over who passed his parents address to the papers. And over who posted about the case on Reddit including details of his bank accounts and threats against his parents and young neices. Says all that will be discussed by him in due course (this last point is not strictly related to the doc but Is in the statement)

All in truly shocking carry in by so called journalists representing the BBC. No wonder it's not being broadcast save on digital media.

Source: Tattle.Life

A man with an intellectual disability made threats in the YouTube comment section against the Ingham and Saccone Joly families.

The man was tracked down by police based on his YouTube comments.

Sarah Ingham tells Jess Taylor she is being stalked online. With no evidence Jess repeats this claim but embellished it to be the second of it's kind involving the prosecution of a Tattlers (again, the threats were made on YouTube)

Court documents here show no reference to Tattle at all'

https://opencourtdata.uk/criminal/case/1182492117687059220

A news article on the case also indicates this was a YouTube issue https://courtnewsuk.co.uk/let-off-for-stalker-who-threatened-to-kill-youtuber-family/

(Behind paywall but screenshot by Yel.)

The absolute best part is Chris Ingham claimed to his legal team that he left the country because of the stalking and lost brand deals as a result.

Fair fucks to the defendants legal team who wasted no time pointing out he lost brand deals after sending sexts to a 16 year old child and left the country to avoid his tax bill 🤣 and this is now on the public record 🤣

Man got a suspended sentence. Again YouTube.

https://archive.ph/XQTWA

Similar to the Times interview but with new details she doesn't seem to have mentioned before that I can see, including at Westminster last year.

Zoom calls and WhatsApp groups were created.

She didn't just feel suicidal, says she attempted suicide in September 2022.

Says an online stalker came to one of her events, put her hands inside her underwear and said "I've always wanted to do that". No mention In the article of reporting this in broad daylight sexual assault to the police or of charges being brought.

Retells the story that holiday snaps were taken off her public Instagram and sold for money to people who had acess to her public Instagram to complain.

The Mirror say Jess has asked them not to name her stalkers.

Source: online news outlet

I briefly mentioned free speech in one of my post's on this sub earlier.

If anyone has any opnions/questions on the under 16 social media ban, the FSU are looking to hear your questions and concerns, contact details on attachment. Personally, I am a bit mixed at the moment. I do want to see a ban on childten under 18 being monetised on SM, I find that appalling. However, I do understand children need to be accustomed with technology and i'm all for that. I also think it shouldn't just come down to platforms taking responsibility, parents need to be involved too, but how to police that is impossible. The attached is a chance to share your views/concerns.

They went from complimenting each other to nothing

Dr Jess book is out and it mentions tattle 41 times and mentions mumsnet 0 times so it seems clear she at least wants people to believe her stalking stories all relate to tattle.

She tells a story about a publicly/online planned plot to attack her at her 2022 book launch. It's a dramatic tale involving a ploy to avoid arrest using...er fake names to book the tickets?

Jess has 3 (or was it 2? She forgets and uses both) plain clothes undercover officers there who can only tell her she's safe "for now" having looked for rogue tattlers wearing Groucho Marx glasses in the bogs and under every seat.

Took Tattlers this evening all of about two seconds to figure out she didn't have a thread on tattle in 2022 and the thread she references is this fairly benign one from mumsnet where people...well they call her a liar and a fantasist and in fact mostly say they are NOT going to her book launch. I can't think why anyone would think her a liar ...

https://archive.is/ycQjQ

1st 5 pics are excerpts from the book. Last 3 are Tattle detectives