u/PartTimeNoseyWitch

After yesterday’s update I would like to share some tips on how to avoid any unwanted attention:

- even if your post/comment history is set to private, third-party websites are being used to look at user’s posts. Make a new account to post here if you share a lot, or have shared a lot of personal info on Reddit

- be mindful of commenting on anyone connected to anti-Tattlers (Lauryn Goodman, Jess Taylor, Steph Vavron etc). Even commenting positively on people’s accounts who have spoken out against them can be a dogwhistle for plonkers that you are a Tattler or a Redditor

- if you receive any unwanted friend requests to your personal social media or interactions, don’t specify when it was on here as this can then be used to link your Reddit account to you

If anyone does receive anything of the such, particularly any threats or LegalGPT communications, please feel free to send to me so I can add to my collection, and clarify that what has been said holds as much weight as a fart in the countryside. Everything will be kept entirely confidential and will not be shared with anyone.

Sounds very over the top, and to be honest, rather pathetic but I’ve encountered a couple of people over the last year who have been worried sick by aforementioned behaviour and it brings me great pleasure to be able to help quash the bullying attempts.

I’m going to try my best to explain the whats and whys as simply as possible. I can only go off what I’ve seen, so hopefully I’ve not missed anything. Being on this sub for a while will mean you’ve seen various pieces of evidence which suggest there is a lot more to the case than 1) has been mentioned in the judgement 2) has been mentioned when it comes to this new appeal. Unfortunately, at the moment they may be irrelevant or unusable…

The original case was won by default - defamation, harassment, misuse of private information and data protection.

It was won by default because there was no defence, and it also looked as though SB had wilfully ignored legal correspondence.

What Sebastian did wasn’t actually an appeal, he made an application to set the judgement aside on the basis he was unaware of it.

This means that Sebastian’s argument at this stage would be relevant to matters in awarding the judgement in this absence - the matter of whether or not there was defamation etc. wouldn’t come into it. All that needs to be established is whether or not there were procedural issues, the defendant wasn’t aware.

The appeal which has been granted will likely only be looking at one key issue - was Justice Humphreys correct in his decision to set the original decision aside.

The Court of Appeal could reinstate the original judgement - this would be the worst outcome for Sebastian and the only route would then be for him to take it to Supreme Court. They could effectively order a retrial - at this point it will then mean that SB will be able to argue against the original claim of defamation. They could also agree that Judge Humphreys was correct and the judgement should be set aside.

My opinion - having seen the judgement which reports the document was sent via a link and evidence shows the link was never opened, along with the legal team admitting they hadn’t disclosed that they knew of SB’s identity earlier than they did. They are fundamentally huge procedural failings which are entirely relevant to Justice Humphrey’s decision. JH was quite fair in the judgement and gave a wide berth to things which other judges may have deemed outright misconduct.

I’ve only learned from reading the Substack from the brilliant Kerry Daynes, Forensic Psychologist with decades of experience, that there are multiple places of support for victims of stalking. I wanted to do a post to highlight this in case any of Jess’s followers happen to see these posts, they can save themselves £22 buying her book and reach out to some professionals:

We have excellent services - the National Stalking Helpline at the Suzy Lamplugh Trust, Paladin, Action Against Stalking, the Hollie Gazzard and Alice Ruggles Trusts and more.

If you or someone you know is being stalked, the National Stalking Helpline is available on 0808 802 0300. Report every incident to police. Documentation is protective. If you need mental health support, please don’t be afraid to ask for it.

But seemingly we’re being given more and more! The Substack on JT was sensational… a respected FORENSIC psychologist with actual frontline experience (not just a bunch of exaggerations peddled to make themselves sound super duper important) called JT out for what she is.

Any predictions of what else we might be getting?

Disclaimer - I can only speak for myself but had the anti-Tattle brigade not been so loud and lied I wouldn’t really give a toss about all this. I hate liars and people who weaponise things to get their own way so I’m fully enjoying the downfall of the likes of Jess and Neil. CLEAN HANDS DOCTRINE 4LYF x

Not massively up to date with the goings on of the Brighton stalker recently but I’m assuming she’s been pretty quiet - at least quiet concerning her usual posts digging at A&K…

Does anyone know when she’s been quiet since?

Just wondering if it may coincide with what we learned yesterday about the legal team having to apologise back in March for not disclosing they knew SB’s identity, at that point they would’ve been made aware that the verdict would be compromised from their perspective.

Or did A&K finally get some sort of legal protection? Or has she finally stopped with her nonsense?

Any ideas?

🙋🏽‍♀️

I’ve been on this sub for quite a while now and haven’t been quiet (lol sorry not sorry I just love a chinwag) but just because I have opinions, that doesn’t automatically equal illegal or wrongdoing. I’ve been told I am committing all sorts of wrongs and been argued with that I will be hauled before the courts. Now seems like the appropriate time to disclose that I am legally educated to post-graduate level, so from my perspective, the goings on in this sub have been far more sinister than most give it credit for.

To bully and threaten people into silence, flaunting an abundance of wealth and a legal team is absolutely diabolical. I have been privy to numerous DMs/emails which have been sent to users in this sub, it isn’t my place to share them and I won’t, but trust me when I say, they are vile. The cocky DMs I received - along with the link to a supposed “legal letter” which I didn’t open were all laughable to me, because I KNOW I didn’t do anything wrong. There is a whole catalogue of evidence which has been collated over the months.

I hope anyone who was affected by threats or harassment and is reading from afar feels some sense of justice and encouragement from today’s judgement. I will continue to contribute my opinions and commentary on whichever matter I see fit, and as always I will do so in a fair and LEGAL manner. I hope everyone else does the same. My DMs are always open for anyone who is impacted by what I’ve discussed and will stay between us.

I think it’s safe to say that they’re a sad individual who purports to being doing some sort of vigilante justice to protect particularly unscrupulous influencers from big bad “trolls”, when in actual fact it’s all self-serving and a cover for being a nasty piece of work bully.

TU isn’t truly interested in the morals they feign to uphold, which is that people on Tattle are the bad guys and everyone who has a thread is a victim of bullying. No, they cherry pick who they think deserves their BTEC level of revenge, and refuse to operate for influencers they themselves don’t like. Yes, the bar must be in hell if LG meets the criteria but others are a no-go.

But worse than that, they have no problem at all with throwing people who helped them under the bus. People who naïvely trusted them and bought into what they were doing as something helpful and kind. People who were lonely and struggled to make friends. TU used them and then turned on them when they realised that TU isn’t the social justice warrior they make out they are. Some might say it is grooming to befriend and use vulnerable people on the internet for your own self-gratifying purposes.

TU has been on this sub behind numerous profiles lately posting pictures and doxxing one of their victims. They first did it and claimed that the person was TU, in an attempt to entice bullying and a pile on, but it fell flat.

TU, you don’t need to entice bullying, you’re capable of doing that all by yourself.