u/Relative-Narwhal-519

Emilie Kiser should be mortified about this comment. No humility, whatsoever. Even her most faithful stans cannot reckon with this. It’s patently false. She could have just ignored it. But she hearted it ànd said “thx”. It may be a troll, but 1k have liked it.

She and Brady caused their child’s existence or “turn on earth” or “one life” to end. Perhaps as early as 90 years prematurely. It wasn’t an accident.

Yes. They should be gutted ànd miserable. This isn’t an end by cancer. It’s a slow painful end they chose for their son. What’s worse is they turned around and set up a similar scenario for kid two, while cosplaying water safety advocates.

She’s a lying, child exploi+ing bit(h. Instead, she appears in a 2k 🩸 money outfit.

Trigg isn’t smiling down. If he understood how overconsumption was prioritized over his life, he would feel similarly to anyone with a brain. But he can’t.

He has no capacity to feel anger or luck. You can blame the people you are calling amazing.

Old video where she freely showed who she truly is. She don’t gaf about her “girlies.” Why have we funded these mean grifters?

It’s wild to me that the new, not as ratchet and smug because she risks alienating the dwindling fan base. That’s why she erased a bunch of videos today, including the licking of that phone.

Can’t erase Trigg’s videos though cuz unlike the phone licking, his videos are worth their weight in paying off the house.

And she’s right back to shilling for flamingo razor, sadly.

Mentions being a mom, her goals for her community, etc.

And this is what she’s trying so hard to get back to: being adored, envied, and having sponcon with the big brands.

She was fraud back then, too. Was just Getting into her snake oil era.

Too bad she let the overconsumption go to her head to the point where vanity and the allure of increased riches stopped her from protecting her child, even after being allegedly offered a free fence. Her set was more important to her.

What is she wearing?

Daily drills is overpriced, doesn’t allow returns, and allegedly uses sweat shop labor in India. Is that child labor?

And charges 200 bucks an item. And the items aren’t organic cotton.

Aside from all that, they are allegedly showering the neglectful mom with pre-released PR, so gifting her multiple items, which she doesn’t disclose as gifts.

E said this on TikTok that she’s getting pre-released merchandise.

Nice “organic”, but fraudulent advertising if this is all true because material connections need to be released. Not surprising E would blow off a regulation, like she did the fence (they ignored county law).

What do the owners care, though? They sold their company for 65 million, remain stakeholders, and will get millions more for their IME Walmart quality clothing if they make their 2029 quota.

So they are slapping this stuff on the reckless endangerment mother in hopes that it looks organic (not like an ad) and her minions will go into debt.

I wanted to display, all in one place, some accountability. I present this info from court documents that may not be accessible to the general public. I will not go into great lengths because I want people to follow.

1. the first is from her original lawsuit in may 2025 when she rushed to court days after his death to save her brand. misinformation and fan fiction has helped fund a pro-e narrative: that is, she only wanted the graphic footage sealed. No. She wanted ever last word hidden so her brand would not suffer. See the pic. So while she lies to you about honesty and “just sharing my life”, pic one tells the real story

2. misinformation has been brought to this sub saying that she was amenable to a redacted version being released. This is also patently false according to the motion in picture two. She has been fighting for over a year to hide the full truth.

3. see the beginning of paragraph two “Although”. Many people say parents are seldom charged. While this is true, keep in mind that B’s alleged negligence passed a threshold which differentiated his “crime” and put this allegedly negligent family into another category wherein the police believed he should be charged. This is esp relevant for people who say this was an accident like any other, that T was merely a drowning stat (no, the police saw him as a child abuse victim first and foremost).

MLM is now looked upon with great suspicion and stigma.

The MLM huns have moved cunningly from “just sharing an amazing life-changing product” to “just sharing my life, but, oh, this product works great, btw; I am even giving you a discount!”

Ingenious! But fraudulent, cunning, and unethical influencer culture with the added exploitation of child labor that has become, in EK’s case, alleged child abuse and neglect.
It’s eerie how much overlap there is here.

I’d actually say MLM was a little less predatory because there wasn’t quite the same guise of friendship, intimacy, and access to someone’s private life, and there wasn’t nearly as much child labor baked into the business model.

I mean zero disrespect to SW, btw. CW is one of the most repulsive men alive, but I think these screenshots illustrate exactly why the public is getting sick of snake-oil saleswomen trying to dupe other women while pretending they’re simply “sharing their lives.”

EK is definitely not a woman promoting and uplifting other women. She monetizes the illusion of friendship, then sells directly into the trust that illusion creates. She preys on vulnerable women who are not discerning enough to recognize when intimacy is actually advertising.

For those saying enough is enough, the “haters” (read: those who never bought her schtick) did not cause her “downfall” or fall from grace.

Her arrogance, greed, and inability to exercise even basic restraint did.

I believe her major miscalculation is that she was so insulated by the cocoon of sycophant Stans that she believed she was untouchable. Instead of humbling herself and being grateful she even had an audience to return to (a POC, man, or someone poor or old wouldn’t have had one), she was arrogant, cocky, and pushed boundaries.

If she had simply stuck to GRWMs, OOTDs, vacations, à bit of planned giving, and shown even a trace of humility, the “haters” eventually would have lost interest. I would have, but I couldn’t turn away from the spectacle. I’ve never seen anything like this.

Her greed would not allow her to stop monetizing every moment of her life, even when during the death anniversary. She repeatedly sabotaged herself.
She clapped back, flaunted her wealth, sneered at criticism, and carried on with the smug confidence of someone who believed grief had granted her permanent immunity from accountability. She danced, mukbanged, “activated her bob,” cackled, paraded her draft king around (many times for clap backs), and treated public disgust like just another engagement metric.

I believe the life jacket was the breaking point. I think many people felt ill-at-ease after a year of cognitive dissonance where filling her cup reached epic proportions not even enjoyed by royalty. Linking 800 dollar hats, but also 15 dollar ones for commission. This way, the plebs can drool over her purchase, but she can make commission from theirs.

If she hadn’t been so thoroughly arrogant for an entire year, perhaps people would have continued to be charitable or wouldn’t be as adamant on cancelling her after the life jacket.

She is so repulsive ànd reviling ànd I will never buy the idea that this falls into the parameters of normative grief.

Here are some highlights

Some of y'all need a briefer on mythology and martyrdom 

It's odd to me that the delusion continues in the wake of strike two of reckless endangerment (now at 100% of her kids).  How can you think this whole jig has an iota of authenticity? She views you as nuisance to contend with in order to retain her lavish, overconsumptionist lifestyle while gloating and brandishing her purchases to people who are struggling to afford the basics (three days of clothing in Mallorca reached 30k). In what social setting is it considered couth to constantly show off? They are all disingenuous, but most don't have a death on their resume. 

People are waking up to the narrative of the martyrdom of EK, but these myths need to be debunked: 

EK is a martyr for shouldering the blame since Draft King won't speak up 

This is the most laughable. She's the softer, more strategic target of the two--the one who evokes audience empathy as a female and now a pregnant female. The king has no agency and has likely been advised to shut up, lest he risk self-implication. Draft King hasn't even spoken up and has brought wrath to the brand twice now (liking that reel and the life jacket--imagine what would happen if he actually spoke?). If she were a martyr, she'd get off the internet so Draft King could avoid daily excoriation. 

 "Swim Safety” was Just a $54 Ralph Lauren Ad  
 So the Ralph Lauren infographic (not a typo--it wasn't a swimming safety post, it was an ad. It was light green suit) fooled many of you. Aside from that, T1 did not succumb first abd foremost to a swim statistic (one in four drown), as she'd like you to believe. It was negligence, but Emilie Kiser doesn't not want to associate with the negligent parenting "community" because most are in prison for like-crimes, i.e., those that truly have things in common with her are behind bars. Besides, the "neglectful community" doesn't look and spend like her. If anything, she should be part of the April movement (anti-child abuse, which includes neglect). The shorts in her ad were not the correct color. So she was sending people to buy unsafe shorts to make a buck.

EK is a martyr because she's being bullied and harassed. She’s suffered the ultimate. Leave her alone

Grief does not absolve blame. It’s not a moral detergent and many in correctional facilities, residents contend with paralysing regret, shame, and being locked up. I am not saying she should be in prison, but there wasn’t a slap on the wrist for either.

Talking about a public influencer, who will not go away, is not harassment. She is not being cornered, contacted, or forced to read it. Being offended by strangers discussing your public behavior does not make you a victim. Maybe take your fake fucking bullshit and get a job. I promise you, people will forget you in a month. You haven't a shred of talent).

EK is a wonderful mother (all over her page) and you cannot form judgment about her motherhood because we only see a silver of her day 
The life jacketless boy appeared for a few seconds. We cannot prove what happens off camera, but when the sliver that appears shows a safety failure, it is perfectly reasonable to question what the rest looks like. You cannot insist the camera shows too little to judge her while also pretending everything outside the frame must be better.

EK is authentic and we miss her 
Sad and pathetic women mistake marketing for friendship. She talks like you are her bestie because it sells products. You keep defending a woman who does not know you exist.

As many of us have been saying, this is 100 percent inorganic and managed with calculation. I attach what may have been a war room white board at S ànd S that E saw each Tuesday on Zoom (obviously, à fake cartoon I made). Part of reclaiming the wholesome family was to rehab B. They waited until the new year ànd he was reintegrated in a piecemeal fashion.

I am not in PR, but I think her rehabilitation team overlooked a key component: her detractors. I think the long game was to reclaim her pre-drowning aura and balance sheet by simply pushing forward, flanked by stans (the register was still ringing, so why address the discontent?) ànd brushing aside critics.

Road bumps, which included her followers’ discomfort with too much indulgence, were remedied by occasional grief grifts (followed by immediate links).

But generally speaking, I think they thought the critical mass of Stans would allow them to dismiss the nuisance-like “noise” of her critics until they rolled out onto the other side. I don’t think the current crisis would be unfolding if she hadn’t been so smug, overindulgent, and always revelling in clap-backs. This tends to make your enemies keenly attentive.

She essentially ignored the hornet’s nest. Instead of advising her to tamp it down a bit, act more gracious, pretend to be a philanthropist, etc., PR green-lighted the repulsively gauche and ostentatious behavior because they thought they could. And it worked until she fucked up. M fucked it up for her, actually.

It was actually her detractors who spotted the absence of a life jacket. Scrutiny wouldn’t have been as heavy if they were more winsome characters. Her own arrogance is her undoing. Even when she comes back, the road will always be filled with potholes. And she will. Her child’s death wasn’t enough to end the grift and compel her to leave the “job” that led to his death. She’s not going anywhere.

And yeah, re-introducing B was such a slap in the face. This woman thought she was untouchable.

This was probably one of the more egregious forms of exploitation showing that money and gifts trump àll else, where e is concerned. Literally.

RW Fine, a TX jewellery company, gifted E à 20k necklace and then used her deceased child’s name to market the necklace with E’s permission.

When people wrote to them, they took this picture down, only to quietly put it back up a few months later.

It would be unsettling if a stranger wore my deceased child’s name to sell a product for à MAGA company. Heck! Any company!

They took it down again after people wrote à second time, but who knows if it’s up. Likely is.

Someone on here knows the owner ànd it checks out that she would greenlight this, according to her.

Proportionately, it’s minuscule. Brands, however, like growth. They don’t like stagnation or controversy. They especially dislike decline.

Her bread and butter = brand deals and shilling.

As we know, EK spent drowning awareness day posting commissioned links ànd removing community notes. Links included à 500 dollar dress and she showed us how to shave, despite fighting for privacy. She was dethroned as the water awareness queen (she doesn’t care about endangering her own child—you think she cares about children, writ large 😂💰? So, back to links.

She and others of her ilk accomplish two things by doing this:

1. she gets to show off her expensive goods, arrogantly conveying she’s living it up
2. more importantly, she knows her followers will likely skip over the dress, but will ultimately buy something cheaper. She’ll get the commission on driving you to Zara’s website

PS: In real time, she deleted questions from Stans asking if she’d mention drowning awareness. Those ppl joined our sub yesterday