Latest thinking re: non-foam insulation in unvented Cape Cod cathedral ceilings?
Hi all. I am trying to wrap my mind around the latest thinking around insulating unvented short-slope cathedral ceilings in Cape Cods that open up to a small vented top attic above, and would really appreciate any guidance folks can provide!
I have read a lot of articles and presentations and posts and am still not quite sure I fully understand what is considered reasonably safe and why, especially when it comes to cellulose vs fiberglass and whether the insulation should be up against the roof deck or if there should be baffles. (I know there has been a fair amount of research in the last 10-15 years or so on this from places like BSC and Byggmeister, although I haven’t seen any updates since 2023ish and some of the findings seem confusing to me as a layperson.) Assuming a retrofit situation where rigid exterior foam and spray foam are off the table (which I understand are by far the safest and most code-compliant options), what are the least risky ways to handle sloped ceilings where the rafter bays open up to a top attic in region 4A?
— Is dense-pack cellulose in these slopes now considered reasonably safe as long as they open up to a top attic up above, based on recent research (such as New England’s Favorite Roof Retrofit: Moisture Data from Three MA Case Studies)? What are the most important factors to minimize risks in this situation? It’s important to make sure the cellulose is packed very densely, right? Does the ceiling drywall provide enough of an air barrier to keep moisture out (assuming no recessed lighting or other penetrations), or are there other steps that should be taken to protect against air/moisture traveling into those slopes in a retrofit situation? Does it matter if the top attic only has gable vents?
— What is the building science behind baffles/air gaps and whether insulation should touch the roof deck or not (in a situation without soffit vents from below, but where it’s an old house with a wood plank roof deck that probably has some outdoor air leaking in through cracks and gaps, and then the baffles go up into the vented top attic)? Does this differ for cellulose vs fiberglass? I would have thought that baffles would help or at least not hurt (except decreasing the R-value a little), but that doesn’t seem to align with the importance of making sure cellulose is really densely packed without any airflow. Or is it okay for the cellulose to be densely packed against baffles rather than the sheathing itself? Does it matter what the baffles are made out of?
— The modeling study “Moisture-Safe Unvented Wood Roof Systems” seems to suggest that faced fiberglass batts would be significantly safer than cellulose in a regular unvented rafter bay in zone 4 (table 3 on page 11)– does that sound right? But then is table 4 on that page saying that it is too risky because if air flows through the insulation there will be too much time with condensation potential at the roof deck? If so, is that still true in the Cape Cod situation where there is an attic above that the moisture can rise up into? How about if there are baffles? Is fiberglass generally considered safer or less safe than cellulose in these situations?
— Vapor diffusion ports are allowed in un-vented roofs as an alternative to foam in zones 1-3, but they were tested by BSC in zone 5 in MA and failed, correct? Have they ever been tested in zone 4A? Here near DC it feels like our climate (winter monthly average temps around 40) is closer to, say, Charlotte, than MA. I saw that ages ago Joe Lstiburek said he thought they would probably work in zone 4 but needed more testing– were they ever tested or was it assumed that the zone 5 testing went poorly enough that they should be avoided in zone 4 as well? Also, is the top attic of a Cape Cod considered to be kind of like a giant vapor diffusion port, and if so, does it matter if the attic only has gable vents and no ridge vents?
Thanks so much in advance for any insight you can share!