What "relationships" is "relationship anarchy" about?
I posted here a week ago, saying I wanted "relationships" rather than "partners." Only after a lot of back-and-forth did I realize how my statements were being misunderstood and why so many people were just telling me I'm just a polyamorist.
I didn't mean "relationships" in the sense of "romantic/sexual partners." I meant "relationships" in the sense of "relations to others" writ large.
I'm keen to decentre partnership-type relationships as the "most meaningful" relationships in the world. People see and treat me like I'm somehow bereft of "meaningful relationships" because I don't "partner up."
By contrast, I subjectively experience my life as full with a rich ecosystem of relationships: I have a "relationship" with the elder orphan on my street, I have a "relationship" with the plants in my garden, I have a "relationship" with the kinkster who lives downtown, I have a "relationship" with myself, and so on.
What "relationships" is "relationship anarchy" about? Is it just a way for rethinking romantic/sexual partnerships, or more fundamentally about the diversity of ways we relate?