

3D-Printable Jaeger Review: Gipsy Danger
Gipsy Danger: I'm specifically reviewing the 1:250 scale files intended for FDM printers (there is a smaller scale version intended for resin printers; you get both versions in a single purchase). At 1:250, Gipsy Danger is roughly 12 inches tall at the conn pod. This model of Gipsy actually works rather well, with the caveat that you'll want to print all the ball joint components out of PETG or ABS and with 4-6 wall perimeters + 50-100% infill. The rest of the Jaeger can be printed out of PLA with 2 wall perimeters and 10-15% infill without issues. The ball joints for the hips and shoulders were a little finicky but nothing compared to the nightmare that was Romeo Blue's hip assembly. The model comes with two different options for the conn pod (one with the visor built in and one with it printed separately). The visor and the turbine can both be printed with transparent filament if you intend to add lights to the figure (interior space for this is provided and the torso is divided into front and rear sections for easy access). The level of detail is phenomenal, with all major parts of the Jaeger thoroughly modeled with a high poly count. There are two forearm options, one that allows a chain sword to friction fit in a slot on the outer side, the other does not have the slot.
I have three main complaints with this model - firstly the lack of articulation for the torso, conn pod, and elbows (the elbows can bend but cannot rotate, making the classic fist in hand move impossible to pose). I ended up partially solving the conn pod articulation issue with some hot glue and a 3D-printed snap-in ball joint. My second complaint is the lack of a powered up plasma cannon option for the forearms. I ended up solving this by creating my own that can be swapped for the regular hand. My final complaint is the shoulder shields, due to their geometry they are very likely to snap no matter what orientation they are printed in. This is not a huge issue, but it is something to be aware of.
Overall I'm giving this one a solid 7/10.