u/Sea_Tap8230

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

https://preview.redd.it/2wqv06gt7cah1.png?width=1399&format=png&auto=webp&s=0027f9555df8a0d59e4d79e81fab2b2a747a3b99

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

https://preview.redd.it/7smvhw3nqy8h1.png?width=1639&format=png&auto=webp&s=28a2bb6fe7eabf591ac48c69f52ff18742b82aa6

If they manage to hold on to their lead, Algeria's World Cup hopes are preserved.

This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post

Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Graphs generated using Python based on stats from FotMob.

Fig 1: Table showing African teams' games played, wins, draws, losses, goals for, goals against, team conduct score, and points in the World Cup after Matchday 1. The table ranking is determined by points, followed sequentially by goal difference, goals scored, team conduct score, and the FIFA Men's World Ranking if a tie persists.

Fig 2: Comparison of expected goals (xG) versus actual goals scored by African teams in the World Cup after Matchday 1. It gives a rough indication of finishing ability. If a team is above the line (Goals > xG), it means that they scored more goals than their chances suggest. It can mean better finishing or luck. If a team is below the line (Goals < xG), it means they scored fewer goals than their chances suggest. It can mean a few things, including wasteful finishing (players missing good chances) and strong opposition goalkeeping or defending that prevented expected goals from being scored. If a team is on the line (Goals = xG) or near the line (Goals ≈ xG), that means a team performed as expected.

Fig 3: This analysis is relative within African teams only. Comparison of African teams' attacking and defending strength in the World Cup after Matchday 1 using expected goals (xG) per game, reflecting attack, and expected goals against (xGA) per game, reflecting defence. It shows the quality of chances a team creates versus the quality of chances the team allow the opponent to create. The graph is divided into four quadrants and uses the averages within only the African teams as the midpoints. If a team is located in the top-right quadrant, it means they have created a high amount of quality chances and have a strong attack while not allowing their opponents to create a high amount of quality chances, meaning they have a strong defence as well. Teams located in the bottom-left quadrant mean they struggle in creating a high amount of quality chances while struggling to limit opponents' scoring opportunities, or put simply, weak defence and weak attack. Teams in the top-left quadrant play defensively, denying the opposition of creating a high amount of quality chances, but they also struggle with generating a high amount of high-quality chances themselves. Put simply, they have a strong defence but a generally weak attack. Teams in the bottom-right quadrant generate a lot of expected goals, or a high amount of high-quality chances, but are also vulnerable to a high amount of high-quality chances from the opponent. They are strong attacking teams but generally weak defensively.

Fig 4: This graph is basically the same as Fig 3 but instead uses World Cup-wide averages for comparison of African teams' attacking and defending strength in the World Cup after Matchday 1.

Fig 5: This chart shows the difference between actual goals scored and expected goals (xG) for African teams in the World Cup after Matchday 1. By subtracting xG from actual goals scored, the chart shows which teams scored more goals than expected from their chances and which scored fewer. Positive values indicate that a team scored more goals than its xG would predict. Negative values indicate that a team scored fewer goals than expected, which may suggest missed opportunities or strong opposition goalkeeping or defending. Values close to zero indicate an expected level of finishing

Fig 6: This chart shows the difference between expected goals (xG) and expected goals against (xGA), known as expected goal difference (xGD), for African teams in the World Cup after Matchday 1. xGD measures the overall quality of chances a team generates versus the chances they allow. A positive xGD indicates that a team is creating better quality chances than it is allowing, suggesting stronger overall performance in both attack and defence. While a negative xGD indicates the opposite. Values close to zero indicate a balanced performance.

الإجهاض: إجراء طبي أو جراحي يستخدم لإنهاء الحمل. وهو يختلف عن فقدان الحمل (الإجهاض التلقائي)، الذي يحدث من تلقاء نفسه.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion

في ناس يقولولك الإجهاض بس يصح في حال ان الحمل نتيجة اغتصاب او لو الحمل بيسبب خطر لحياة الأم

وفي ناس ضده نهائي ويقولولك ده قتل اطفال

وفي ناس تقولك ان حرية المرأة في الاختيار أهم من كل حاجة، ف مسموح في كل الأحيان

وفي ناس بيحطوا حد على الفترة اللي ممكن يحصل الإجهاض فيها، وده عشان حيوية الجنين، اللي هيه المرحلة الجنين يقدر يعيش بره رحم أمه وعادةً بتحصل في الأسبوع 23–24

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_viability

رأيي انا مايل اكتر ل الحجة اللي فاتت

قبل حيوية الجنين، معندناش اي ادلة ان الجنين واعي ومعظم العلماء قالوا ان الجنين مش واعي قبل الحيوية، ف المعلومة دي بتخلي حجة قتل الاطفال اصعب ل التبرير عشان مش واعي اصلا ف قتل ايه؟؟ لو استخدمنا المنطق ده ف ممارسة العادة السرية وإخراج السائل المنوي يعتبر قتل اطفال عشان الاتنين مراحل في الحياة والمرحلتين الطفل مش عايش فيهم.

بس انا منفتح في الموضوع و ممكن رأيي يتغير ويا ريت نخلي النقاش ميتحولش لجدال ديني.

View Poll

View Poll