Since there are no light engines I'm assuming it doesn't work, but theoretically it should be possible.
I like his kit, but he does no damage. If you play against tanks then they will automatically win because they will outheal you and outdamage you. If you play against squishies then you will win only if you have your 2nd ability up. Even against minions your abilities don't do damage. He needs to be buffed.
Like Ryze is so broken to the point that he just deletes you meanwhile Vlad is hiding under the turret just to survive is madness.
I know what I said is madness, but the madness makes sense. Give me the chance to explain it.
At the beginning of existence there was nothing. There is still nothing because you can't create something from nothing, but we are here. So how can we exist? We don't.
Imagine the mathematical variable: X =
X can be anything, but nothing is assigned to it; therefore, it remains as a pure capacity that accepts all abstract concepts and results in the illusion of existence for those that share the same abstract space.
This means every combination of what could have been exists. The reason why you and I can interact is because we are in the same concept, but we aren't really here because we don't exist.
Unexistence is our existence.
I wrote it longer in Philpapers. If you want to read it then this is the link for it:
Kind regards,
Sevdat Tufanogullari
I don't think anything exists which is why everything exists. I know what I said is madness, but the madness makes sense. Give me the chance to explain it.
At the beginning of existence there was nothing. There is still nothing. So how can we exist?
Imagine the mathematical variable: X =
X can be anything, but nothing is assigned to it; therefore, it remains as a pure capacity that accepts all abstract concepts and results in the illusion of existence for those that share the same abstract space.
This means every combination of universes exists as a template of what could have been if it were possible to create something from nothing. The reason why you and I can interact is because we are in the same template. Kind of like a computer program ready to be executed but never initialized.
I wrote it longer in Philpapers. If you want to read it then this is the link for it:
Has there been similar theories?
From what I understand, we are made of atoms. How those atoms move and collide lets us make decisions. We feel like our decisions are our own because our body is part of the process that led to that decision, but in reality we are just following the process. It's kind of like sitting in a self driving car and looking out the window. The body is moving and your just witnessing it.
A French mathematician named Pierre-Simon Laplace came to the same conclusion in 1814. The theory is called Laplace's demon. Imagine a pool table. If you place all the balls to the exact same spot, hit it with the exact same angle, force, etc then the balls would always move the same position. If you imagine atoms like the balls in the pool table then this same logic would work as long as all the variables are exactly the same. This would also mean that the future and the past is calculatable by tracing the collisions that occurred or will occur.
I know some of you will say quantum physics, but quantum physics doesn't have all the variables. It's based on probability of where the particles could appear due to lack of data.
Does anybody have any contradictory evidence/theory that really proves that we have free will? If we really have a soul then why can't our soul move our body after a headshot?
So there is a forward pass and backpropagation. When we do backpropagation, we redestribute the weights from output to input so that it'll give the expected output. The problem is that the longer we do this the more the weights get trained to what the most recent expected output is. Previous data gets wiped out if not reintroduced. Scaling the model works due to more free weights but this is like buying more ram to fix a memory leak.
I think we need a third process that needs to run before backpropagation. A recorrection algorithm that optimizes the weight connections and shifts them towards Weight 1 of each layer. That way the bottom weights of the network remain free to be manipulated. Technically the entire network can be zero and we begin the training process from Weight 1-3 of each layer and gradually going further down the layers as we need more space to fill.
I'm imagining the neurons like functions. Instead of having parts of the functions spread all over the memory it makes sense to orginize it by stacking them.