An observation of activity
I just was scrolling through retconned and the mainstream mandela effect subreddit clicking on the posts and the accounts making a majority of the comments inside the posts users profiles. A vast majority of the accounts making posts and comments that are against the phenomenon its self or are comments against those who believe when you check their profile there is no way to view their history. I understand the need for privacy and if the default was that your accounts activity was private and you had to choose to make it public than this would be a moot observation it feels.
When clicking through the posts here more than three quarters of the accounts do not have their post and comments history private. And usually in the comments its the same thing where maybe 1 out of every 5 to 10 users who comments on a post their history will be set to private. Maybe there are some risqué subreddits that they contribute to and don't want random people to discover their vices. I am fairly confident those individuals though would have alt accounts and maybe it is just that in many cases with the more open subreddits that a majority of these people are on alt accounts.
Again this is just an observation. I am probably the only weird one that goes through and looks at accounts posting and commenting to see if they have had the same consistent point of view. Where in the checking historically I have found those who do have their history shared, are fairly consistent. Be it posting about MEs or things classified as being highly strange to talking about other topics they are consistent with how they interact with others. Most of the low effort posts with a topic and maybe 5 or so words in the body of the post stating believers are dumb or comments the same way almost every one like that those users have their history private.
Maybe it is just looking for a connection to something that isn't there. Recently had a discussion about truth and fact/nonfiction. How something can be observed as true but it is only true in that someone has said it or has written it and put a name or lable on or behind it. Every story told is a "true" story. A single word or sentence isn't considered a story but can be verified as fact. The way we use language to manipulate is the same across the board. Only ever interacting over text or written word requires an understanding of how punctuation and sentence structure affects context. It is very easy for people to manipulate and manufacture a meaning behind someone else's words and using lack of context to sway favor or even distrust from it. This is my reason for checking profiles history's.
I appreciate those who have taken their time to read this. Not my intention to throw shade at any one particular individual or group of people with my words. It was just something that stood out to me that I want to believe others have drawn the same connection possibly and only way to find out is put it out there in a semi public forum. We are all in this together. Even if we have a different view from our vantage point. We are all existing at this time sharing in the life experience. If this is just a naturally occurring thing and part of change that all life goes through hopefully sooner or later this will be discovered and taught to us why it happens. Till then our best bet is sharing with others and comparing notes. Even if going in circles as long as the circles keep expanding hopefully its progress being made and not just distractions and filler.
Thanks for your time
Be safe