u/Special_Command7893

Currently, the Wisconsin charging network sucks. Particularly anywhere that doesn’t border Minnesota ;)
It relies almost solely on low-capacity dealer chargers and slow speeds, which, in turn leads to price gouging because “where else are you gonna go”? IONNA would absolutely destroy in this market, and everyone would love to see it. To me, it aligns perfectly with the ethos is IONNA to expand further in the Wisconsin area for this reason

I apologize because these types of posts can be annoying, but it’s an area that truly needs charging infrastructure desperately, and, while I suggest this to most EV charging companies when I get the chance, IONNA is my preferred because I can trust that they will do it best! Keep up the good work, IONNA team!

Hello! I’m planning on running an app on my home server, then exposing it using ngrok and having students access from their chromebooks. I’ve learned how to use ngrok, and I’ve dabbled in exposing things before, so that part I’ve got covered, but I figure that having multiple people connect into the same app at the same time may confuse the server and potentially jumble the output.
To rephrase the question, I’m wondering: if I allow multiple people to connect into my home server at the same time (though they’re still saving files etc on their device), will it allow each user to access the program and keep each I/O separated per user?

I assume the answer to that is no and if it is, is there a way to have every user using the app have a separate account that identifies who they are and thus keeps their data separate?

Thank you!
Edit: I’m running ZimaOS on an old laptop with all my apps installed thru docker. If there’s another app I can add to make this work, that’s fine and would actually be great, particularly for that second question!

Today, I decided to check Ecosia's new privacy policy to see if it details what model the AI Chat uses. Turns out, it doesn't! However, it does confirm the speculation that Ecosia chose to use Mistral AI models. You can read that here.

Ecosia verifies that prompts are handled on Mistral's servers. Because of this, we can infer environmental impact data about the AI Chat because Mistral AI decided to release an environmental impact report about one of their models last year. Ecosia doesn't say which model they use, so these results are not definite, but it can provide a ballpark for the environmental impact of the AI Chat Ecosia currently provides. I say this because the evaluated model (Large 2) was released at the end of 2024, and Ecosia says they use smaller models, so, assuming Mistral has kept up with the rapid development of AI, a flagship model from two years ago may realistically be as powerful as a modern medium-sized model, and thus have roughly the same environmental impact. Below is what Mistral released about what the Large 2 model consumes for one page of text, and I highly recommend viewing the full report with all of the statistics.

https://preview.redd.it/xgjjtksf1j4h1.png?width=1280&format=png&auto=webp&s=e31f7b479f5edbe6274b54deb6ba802f0e875896

Obviously, Mistral would only release the report if it showed itself favorably, and that begs the question, "Why hasn't there been another for their more recent models?" Also, this analysis relies heavily on assumptions about AI development and Mistral, as well as Ecosia itself (for example, Ecosia's use of the phrase "smaller" could be referring to any class of models as "larger"), so take everything written here with a grain of salt. I am not here to justify or show my support for AI Chat. I posted this analysis to clear up speculation about AI Chat and help others in their research.