u/Specific_Avocado_313

Say a comment in Mohit's Comicverse's new Doomsday Screen X trailer breakdown, "I was rewatching Loki and noticed something interesting....

In Season 2, Episode 6, Loki and Mobius have a conversation where Mobius tells Loki about a TVA mission near the Black Sea. They were hunting a variant who was apparently destined to be responsible for nearly 5,000 deaths in the future. But when they found the variant, he was only an 8-year-old boy. Mobius couldn’t bring himself to prune him, and his hesitation caused the timeline to branch. Eventually, Renslayer had to step in and prune the child herself.

So, what if that child was actually Victor von Doom?

Mobius specifically mentions that the mission took place near the Black Sea, and in the comics, Latveria is traditionally located in Eastern Europe, geographically quite close to the Black Sea.

Also, Mobius says the variant was 8 years old. In the comics, Victor von Doom was around 8 when his mother, Cynthia von Doom, was taken by Mephisto.

So what if the Doom we see in the Void is actually that same variant—the 8-year-old Victor von Doom whose timeline was pruned by Renslayer?"

Without going into spoilers of Avengers: Endgame encore, I want to ask if the redesigned timeline display on the TVA screens in Deadpool & Wolverine is a deliberate misdirection, a piece of creative liberty, or a sign that the story is focusing on a single timeline faction. In Loki Season 2, the Temporal Loom squeezed raw timelines horizontally into a thick, braided rope, which Loki later destroyed to free the branches into the sprawling Yggdrasil tree. However, on Mr. Paradox’s monitors in this movie, the graphic is flipped completely vertical—showing an infinite web of realities being tightly funneled vertically downward, forced to pass through a single, highly compressed narrow point right in the middle before fanning out again at the bottom. Is this distinct geometric redesign just creative liberty by the film crew to make the monitors look fresh for the big screen, a deliberate narrative misdirection to trick us about the health of the multiverse, or hard proof that Paradox's rogue department is utilizing custom machinery to isolate, constrict, and exploit a single bottlenecked segment of time despite Loki's tree growing outside?

The MCU’s Asgardian armor rules are completely broken. If we track the continuity, the logic makes no sense: Thor gets his armor via Mjolnir, loses it alongside his powers in Thor (2011), and instantly gets it back when he becomes worthy. However, Thor retains his armor in Ragnarok even after Mjolnir is completely destroyed by Hela, proving the physical suit can exist independently. Then comes the biggest double standard: Cap doesn't get Asgardian armor in Endgame despite calling down the lightning, yet Jane Foster gets a full Mighty Thor armor transformation in Love and Thunder. To completely kill the fan theory that "Mjolnir simply respected Cap's existing tactical suit," the Avengers: Doomsday trailer ends with a returned Steve Rogers in casual civilian street clothes summoning Mjolnir—and once again, his jeans and jacket don't change into armor. Ultimately, what decides who gets armor isn’t a strict logical rule; it's pure cinematic iconography. The directors give Jane armor because she needs a distinct superhero identity, but they keep Cap in his own clothes because the raw image of Steve Rogers himself being worthy carries more emotional weight. It is a total plot hole governed entirely by rule-of-cool filmmaking, isn't it?

Wth it's my decision how to maintain 75% attendance I can have some work/quiz/lab fat prep/sleep/fever as common reasons to miss classes. management