u/Spiritual_Camp387

Improved components and improved stability

30% Coverage

366k snp

Right population model 1

Mbuti.DG

Russia_UstIshim_IUP.DG

Russia_Kostenki14_UP.SG

Russia_MA1_UP.SG

Vestonice16.AG.BY.AA

Villabruna.AG.BY.AA

Belgium_GoyetQ116_1_UP.AG

Georgia_Kotias_Mesolithic.SG

Sweden_Mesolithic_HG.AG

Turkey_Central_Boncuklu_PPN.AG

Jordan_PPNB.AG

Russia_Sidelkino_HG.SG

Morocco_EN.WGC.SG

Morocco_Iberomaurusian.AG

Model 2 same things but I change Iberomaurusian with Israel_Natufian

Are they the same thing or is one more truthful than the other?

I wanted to know what is the difference between these two clusters that brings me back.

The first cluster is called "South-Eastern Sicily" and covers a range of areas from the northern part of eastern Sicily and extends to south-western Sicily up to Agrigento.

The other cluster is called the "south-eastern region" and highlights only the south-eastern part of Sicily.

That is, they're saying the same thing

(South italian Sicily)

What do you think of these results, do they explain the same thing or are there differences?

First photo (simulated)

Second (official g25)

With my new official g25 he confirmed the possible ancestors in the areas of Agrigento on the paternal side. I was born in the hinterland south east Sicily

Qpadm late Antiquity/middleage

After finally merging the myheritage + ancestry dna files The results are more stable.

I was born in Sicily in the eastern hinterland in a small town

That area has undergone a strong endogamy, in fact I have no known relatives in things but they are all concentrated in the town where I was born and a few countries further away

I was born in Sicily but the Sicilian DNA is only 2% it seems strange to me my mother's surname has origins in Sicily, in fact my region of origin is south-eastern Sicily but only 2%?? Strange

But in your opinion, how much influence could my official g25 calculated from the myheritage file? It is known that the raw file of myheritage is not the best in terms of quality

"Old post removed for privacy content"

To try to balance the components and make it run as best as possible for my DNA, the components you will see are proxies for example Turkey\_Pinarbasi.AG and a pure Anatolian so as not to condoning it with Iran or Natufian. I tried 2 models with these results.

First model: The Caucasian component has been absorbed mainly on Iran and to a very small extent on the steppes

The WHG component was absorbed by Steppes

The mota proxy is either a North African or Sub-Saharan signal that contains my DNA, and it is also the reason why if I exchanged Israel Natufian for Iberomaurusian the model worked better

Second model: I tried to pull out the components as clean as possible giving me not good result.

Tunisian proxy captures Natufian and North African component.

This is my last post and useless to keep trying this is all I could do with my raw file... When I have a better raw file, maybe I'll try again

To try to balance the components and make it run as best as possible for my DNA, the components you will see are proxies for example Turkey_Pinarbasi.AG and a pure Anatolian so as not to condoning it with Iran or Natufian. I tried 2 models with these results.

First model: The Caucasian component has been absorbed mainly on Iran and to a very small extent on the steppes

The WHG component was absorbed by Steppes

The mota proxy is either a North African or Sub-Saharan signal that contains my DNA, and it is also the reason why if I exchanged Israel Natufian for Iberomaurusian the model worked better

Second model: I tried to pull out the components as clean as possible giving me not good result.

Tunisian proxy captures Natufian and North African component.

This is my last post and useless to keep trying this is all I could do with my raw file... When I have a better raw file, maybe I'll try again

After a very hard work I can say that this (maybe) is the best model I have made for me.

I know I still have a lot to learn I'm new to this area 1 month or 2.

I will appreciate any of your opinions or advice.

I'm trying to model my kit but I can't get the error rates down any more.

I tried to model my kit using the migration period which is actually not bad but I wanted to be more precise in the components, my raw file is from myheritage which I saw has a bit of low coverage should be about 83% tested by external sources

My out group

References:

Mbuti:B_Mbuti-4.DG

Turkey_N:I0723.AG

Iran_GanjDareh_N:I1947.AG

Russia_Kostenki_UP:Kostenki14.SG

Russia_Karelia_Mesolithic_HG:I0061.AG

Israel_Natufian:I1072.AG

Georgia_KotiasKlde_Mesolithic:KK1.SG

Italy_Abruzzo_Epigravettian:R7.SG

Russia_YanaRiver_UP:Yana1.SG

Uzbekistan_BA:I12499.AG

Italy_Lazio_BA:R11105.SG

Morocco_EN:ktg005.SG

Jordan_EBA:I1706.AG

Russia_EBA_Yamnaya:RISE547.SG

Czechia_BA_BellBeaker:I7249.AG

Poland_CordedWare:pcw040.SG

I was a beginner trying to learn, I am interested in population genetics. These are my new results. If you have any advice I will gladly listen

If you have any suggestions on how to improve my qpadm please ask me

I am a Sicilian born in the hinterland