u/SpliffyTetra

I recently posted some similarities between roman catholics and muslims, but here is another fun one and correct me if I am wrong but it seems like a pattern you can’t unsee once you understand it.

It’s easy to discredit or see when different religions not of Jesus Christ operate in the same way. Mormons say they believe in the bible yet they have the Book of Mormon which expands on the bible, provides it’s own interpretation, and tells the readers how to view the bible and what to believe about it.

It’s the same thing with the Seventh Day Adventists who have Ellen G. White and her writings, Jehovah’s witnesses who have the watchtower group, Muslims who have the hadiths, and when it comes to Roman Catholics they have their catechism of the catholic church book.

To me, it’s a blatant example of Roman Catholics claim to follow the bible yet they reference the catechism book and use that as how they interpret scripture. At any time the pope can update this and say “the church views abc-xyz in this way” and people have to believe it. Nobody is there to challenge it, at they just claim papal infallibility due to the church being established by Christ. In other words, agree to disagree Christ started their physical roman catholic vatican centered church, but who decided to create a separate book and say that should be used to interpret the bible? More importantly, the fact roman catholics blindly accept this without questioning it is crazy to me.

In my opinion, it’s a clear sign and pattern that can’t be ignored.

Am I the only one who sees the similarities between islam and roman catholicism especially when it comes to their debate tactics? What I mean is both of them use this “shifting the goal post” tactic. Muslims love to use this argument that the torah and the bible affirms the Quran yet when you point out inconsistencies in that argument they argue that the Bible is corrupted. It’s not corrupted when it benefits them yet it is when it contradicts Islam.

With Roman Catholicism, it’s the same and they use the same tactic. Whenever you debate them they will try to use the Bible and anytime the Bible contradicts their beliefs they use “tradition” or some vague person or council from hundreds of years ago. It’s fine to use the Bible for them and anytime something contradicts their beliefs like Marian doctrines, intercession of the saints, etc. they try to use the bible for these beliefs and anytime you call it out they switch to some “traditions”.

Am I the only one noticing this? It is extremely frustrating when they always shift the goalpost and deflect.

Anyone else ever hit 2 or 3 blinkers and go play some sports like tennis or football or something? I do and it’s fun, also the gym but in the gym theres not as much movement

Let’s say that there is an AI bubble and it does pop (next week) does that mean that the AI stuff like agentforce, datacloud, and tableau next will be less relevant? I understand Agentforce is hit or miss so far but what about the demand for data cloud, seems to me that it’s in demand now? What does everyone else think? Is it a good investment and cert to get? (Datacloud, agentforce certs)

I know a lot about weed but i think the basics (like sativa is a head high and wakes you up, indica is a couch lock body experience high) are really affecting people differently. For example, I used to think that sativa was the best for studying but now i am wondering if it’s indica, to help me sit there and focus as opposed to being energized. What do you guys think? I ask because, do sativa/indica matter if most strains are hybrid now and you are looking for an effect (like focusing)