u/Storm_Hunter_1025

Is 9 percent too aggressive?
▲ 15 r/EngineeredIncome+1 crossposts

Is 9 percent too aggressive?

https://preview.redd.it/j7nf1j213tjh1.png?width=206&format=png&auto=webp&s=c7e440d077aeace4b02b11bd7eee78dfeff2336a

Attempting to create a durable income machine that compounds without me adding until the income reaches my walkaway number for early retirement. The above allocation matrix is what I am currently holding, and would like opinions on just the synthetic yield sleeve portion (CHPY, ULTY, NVII).

Worth nothing, I have held all of these positions for over a year, and rebalance monthly from distribution income. Blended yield appears to be somewhere around 12%-13%. Below is logic behind the choices made.

Dividend‑Growth Core (65%) SCHD, VOO, VYM, SCHY

  • Long term compounding and growing
  • Stable and time tested

Safety & Stability (10%) SGOV

  • Predictable monthly yield
  • Zero risk

Income Sleeve (15%) SPYI, JEPI

  • Monthly cash flow
  • Lower volatility

Synthetic‑Yield Weekly Sleeve (9%) CHPY, ULTY, NVII

  • Weekly distributions
  • Rebalancing fuel

Cash Buffer (1%) SPAXX

  • Distribution landing zone
  • Rebalancing staging area

Is 9% too agressive? Too risky? or does this look like engineered income?

reddit.com
u/Storm_Hunter_1025 — 4 days ago