u/Subtleiaint

For those of us still fighting, how the hell do we approach GW38?

Are Arsenal going to play seriously, are Palace going to rest players ahead of the Europa Conference final? Is it a good idea to target teams on the beach or do they play better when the pressure's off, will West Ham play like demons and, almost most importantly, what the hell is Pep going to do in his last match?!?

This is going to be such an unpredictable weekend, I want to focus on safe bets but I feel there are none. Has anyone got and words of wisdom for maximising points this week?

reddit.com
u/Subtleiaint — 1 day ago

Comparing the Golden Generation to the Modern Lions

Piggy backing off u/Spiritual_Flows5412's post about the myth of the Golden Generation I wanted to do a comparison between the two era's first 11 as someone who watched both teams closely. The team's are amalgams of the the main players from the 2002-2006 and 2018-2026 eras. Scores reflect their standing during the periods I'm examining.

Golden Generation

Team Balance - 6 - Clearly this was the golden generation's big weakness with huge compromises made in midfield in an attempt to shoe horn in our best players. In fairness we tried Joe Cole and Kieran Dyer on the left but no one was a perfect fit there, the bigger sin was leaving Michael Carrick or Owen Hargreaves on the bench to try and make a Lampard/Gerrard pairing work.

James - 7 - In the 90s he earned the nickname 'Calamity James' but he was a solid PL quality GK with the second most clean sheets in the competition's history (although that's a better reflection of his longevity rather than his ability).

Neville - 9 - he doesn't have the glamourous reputation of his peers but Neville is a PL great who could do everything you wanted a fullback to do and worked tirelessly for the team.

Cole - 10 - Arguably the PL's greatest ever left back, similarly to Neville he could do everything but at an even higher level.

Terry - 10 - An absolute monster of a CB and the leader of the PLs greatest defence. Not the best human being but a brilliant defender.

Ferdinand - 9 - I could be convinced that Ferdinand was a 10 as well, where Terry was crunching tackles, towering headers and shackled attackers Ferdinand was elegance and control. The two complimented each other perfectly.

Beckham - 10 - One of the contenders for England's best modern player he had a wand of a right foot that could deliver a ball to exactly where it needed to be. Some might argue he was a one trick pony but what a trick.

Gerrard/Lampard/Scholes - 10/9/9 - anticipating the arguments I've lumped these three together and their scores can go in any order. Scholes was fantastic on the ball but reckless off it, Lampard is the greatest scoring midfielder in PL history and Gerrard was the personification of Roy of the Rovers. Any team would want one of them, sadly you probably don't want all three at the same time.

Rooney - 10 - Another contender for England's best player Rooney was technically fantastic. if there was a weakness to his game it was his position, arguably he should have played a floating 10 behind another striker but he was always, for both club and country, needed to plug a gap elsewhere.

Owen - 9 - Still capable of magic Owen was already in decline in 2002 after hamstrings problems robbed him of his explosive pace, he still delivered when he was on the pitch though.

Total 108/120

The Modern Lions

Balance - 8 - Under Southgate England were always well balanced with players used in their natural positions and an emphasis on systems. The reason this category doesn't score higher is that Southgate was often too cautious prioritising defence often to England's detriment.

Pickford - 9 - An excellent keeper who continues to serve England well, he's perhaps a touch short of being World Class.

Shaw - 8 - On his day an excellent modern fullback but his fitness and form have fluctuated over the years which has prevented him ascending to England legend status.

Walker - 9 - A football cheat code Kyle Walkers pace saved England too many times to mention. His all-round game wasn't elite but he was just too valuable as England's last line of defence.

Maguire - 8 - I almost gave Maguire a 9 but he's a tier below too many England greats and his latter career mishaps make it impossible. Still a solid England Servant.

Stones - 8 - The mould for a modern CB Stones is as good as a midfielder on the ball, it's just a shame he can't defend as well as a classic CB. When first division strikers say they'd love to play you every week you know there's something amiss. Add in injuries and Stones' career is a tale of never quite hitting true greatness.

Rice - 9 - Rice has built an outstanding career for himself and cemented himself as an England great, he stops just short of legend because he doesn't quite have the toolset of his rivals.

Anderson - 9 - This is a bit presumptuous because we're at the start of his career but Elliott Anderson doesn't just get in because of a lack of competition, he may well be the real deal as well. England don't have many world class defensive midfielders in their history, Anderson might just add to that short list.

Rashford - 8 - On his day he's easily a 9 but he's had such a stop/start career that it's difficult to justify that score.

Saka - 9 - I want to give him a 10 but I know other will disagree, he's the best wide forward I've seen play for England.

Bellingham - 9 - could definitely become a 10 in hindsight, Bellingham is still just 22 and, if he maximises his potential he could become England's greatest midfielder.

Kane - 10 - a simply sensational player and another contender for England's GOAT, his movement is elite, his finishing is elite, his passing is elite, if he was only a little faster he'd be a rival to the world's greatest ever strikers.

Total 104/120

Conclusion

It's closer than I thought (thanks to modern England's better team structure) but I do think the golden generation had the better players.

u/Subtleiaint — 3 days ago

CMV: Football is better with VAR than without

Those of you who call Football 'Soccer' may not know what VAR is, it stands for Video Assistant Referee and is a video review system for Football introduced in 2018, it is also very controversial.

The facts are that VAR has improved referee decision making since it's introduction with refereeing errors dropping to less than a quarter of what they were before its introduction. What makes it controversial is that the reviews take a long time, that goals aren't celebrated until after a VAR check is complete (robbing some of the joy from the game) and, even with VAR, referees still make decisions that fans disagree with (football is chaotic and the line between what is a foul or a handball and what isn't is blurry). Despite this controversy my view is that Football is better VAR, my main argument for this is that fans forget just how bad things were before.

Before VAR 18% (almost 1 in 5) of key decisions made by referees were wrong. Matches were regularly decided by refereeing errors and no amount of 'these things even out over a season' satisfied fans. Post match interviews and fan phone ins were dominated by complaints about the standard of refereeing and the sense of injustice that permeated football was toxic.

In 1993 a documentary team was following England manager Graham Taylor, England were playing the Netherlands in a key qualifier for the 94 world cup and England lost, Taylor was recorded saying to the linesman "The referee's got me the sack. Tell your mate he's just cost me my job." This sort of sentiment was not uncommon.

VAR hasn't ended this toxicity, there are still contentious decisions and much of the discourse has moved from blaming referees to blaming VAR but things are much better than they were. Offside goals are extinct, cynical fouls get punished and diving almost never works anymore. There are valid complaints about the utilisation of VAR but these are process issues that can be fixed rather than a fundamental problem with the system.

Fans have short memories, they're angry with the problems they face now rather than remembering how bad things were in the past. Football would be worse off if we got rid of VAR.

reddit.com
u/Subtleiaint — 7 days ago

Puppy Howling from dawn

We have a 10 week Labrador puppy that's been with us for two weeks now. Whilst she sleeps through the night (from around 2130/2200) she wakes up when it gets light and starts to howl loudly and franticly (any time from 0430). At first we would get up and be with her in the kitchen but my wife and I are exhausted so we've recently tried a new tactic.

When she wakes up we do go downstairs to let her out (we don't play with her) we put her back in her crate afterwards and go back to bed with the aim of ignoring her howling until a more appropriate time (hopefully 0630 but at least 0600). We then have to lie there listening to her cry worrying that she'll wake up the kids. We've only tried that for two mornings so far but it's pretty stressful. This morning she would occasionally calm down but maybe for a minute before the howling starts again.

We do have something over her crate while she sleeps but it's not a black out curtain. She eats around 1800 and gets a treat when she goes into her crate last thing.

What we're looking for is advice on whether we're doing the right thing, whether we just have to stick it out or whether there's a better strategy we can use. Our aim is to get to the point where our first interaction with her is at 0630 when we get up.

reddit.com
u/Subtleiaint — 7 days ago

This question (or ones very similar) have been asked before in the FAQ but the answers were from 14 years ago when the standards of the sub were a little lower and anecdotes were allowed. Therefore I'd like to see if I can get an updated answer.

I've seen claims that the standard of living in the USSR exceeded America in some ways; that education was better, that healthcare was universal, that there was less crime and poverty. Could you please explain what the reality of being a Russian citizen in last communist Russia was actually like.

reddit.com
u/Subtleiaint — 16 days ago

Unless you're speaking to someone who hasn't seen the Blue/Red problem then it's become a worthless proposition.

Over the last few days this problem has been dissected ad infinitum. Essentially we are collaborating on our answers and that breaks the problem. With collaboration this problem is simple, it's trivial to get enough people to agree to vote blue, it's so trivial that it's not a problem anymore (and that's before you accept nobody's answering honestly because there's no actual threat of death).

The only way the problem works is if you don't have a good idea of what other people think and then you have to make a genuine judgement regarding what others may do and what your own risk threshold is.

reddit.com
u/Subtleiaint — 18 days ago

This post refers to pre pandemic norms (PPN), this is a baseline I use to evaluate box office performance. it is calculated as the average box office takings from 2017-19 for any given month. It allows me to compare different months (which traditionally see different levels of business) directly.

Mar Report

Apr total Box Office - $841m (87.8% of PPN)

Mar In Month releases - $651m (62.3% of PPN and counting)

We're out of Q1 and now into the meat of the year where expectations grow. Whilst 60% of PPN is par for Q1 we're hoping for 85% of PPN from April forwards. In that context Apr did fine hitting 87.8%. This was thanks to two big hits, Super Mario Galaxy and Michael, and the excellent legs of Project Hail Mary. Super Mario Galaxy performed broadly in line with expectations, its had a significant drop off from its predecessor but that's normal for sequels, especially when the sequel receives noticeably worse reviews. Michael on the other hand has done really well in spite of its poor reviews with the general audience seemingly preferring a juke box film over the gritty biography critics would have preferred. Expectations were all over the place for Michael with some predicting a billion dollar hit and others a flop, the reality is that it will become the most successful musical biopic in the NABO history although beating Bohemian Rhapsody's global cume is not guaranteed. Project Hail Mary continues smashing expectations and will soon leg out to a x4 multiplier over it's opening weekend, it's done so well it's the second biggest film in Apr beating Michael!

In less good news we have Apr's support acts, whilst the Drama has outperformed expectations Lee Cronin's the Mummy and You, Me and Tuscany both fell well short of theirs meaning, combined, they fell about $40m behind what was hoped for. For the NABO to perform to it's full potential it really needs these smaller films to find an audience and it's part of the reason that Apr 26 fell short of Aprils 23 and 25.

Looking at Mar's in month releases that month should end up around 64-65% of PPN when PHM is finally done (it's just made $8.5m in it's 7th weekend) which puts March above average for a post pandemic Q1 month. Given the over performance of PHM and Hoppers that might be surprising but remember that Mar 23 and 24 saw 4 or 5 blockbusters released in each month whilst 2026 had just 2, it's further evidence that Hollywood has little faith in Q1 releases but, hopefully, the success of PHM and Hoppers will test that theory.

Looking ahead to May I'm feeling cautiously optimistic of breaking 90% PPN. The big releases are The Devil wears Prada 2, Mortal Kombat 2 and the Mandalorian and Grogu. Prada 2 looks like it won't hit the heights some were predicting a couple of weeks ago but it, Fatalities, Baby Yoda and Michael's legs should do enough to make cinema owners happy. The Billie Eilish Tour film, The Sheep Detectives and Obsession are the support acts looking to fill out the schedule. After that we're into June and July with major releases almost every weekend which is where 2026 is expected to shine.

reddit.com
u/Subtleiaint — 18 days ago