Trump’s own trade war contributing to drop in US auto exports to Canada (Globe & Mail July 21st)

Trump’s own trade war contributing to drop in U.S. auto exports to Canada, experts say   ERIC ATKINS, Transportation reporterPublished July 21, 2026Updated July 22, 2026Honda vehicles on a trailer leave a manufacturing plant in Alliston, Ont., in 2025.

FRED LUM/THE GLOBE AND MAIL   U.S. President Donald Trump says Canadian tariffs are to blame for the drop in U.S. auto exports to Canada, but industry experts say there is more behind the decline, including Mr. Trump’s own trade war. Mr. Trump on Monday said he will slap 50-per-cent tariffs on a range of Canadian imports in retaliation for Canada’s tariffs on U.S. cars, a widespread ban on U.S. alcohol and dairy market restrictions.He said trade figures showed a year-over-year drop of 22 per cent in Canada’s import of U.S. cars for the 12 months ending in March of 2026, blaming Canada’s “scheme.” At the same time, Canadian imports from Japan, Mexico, South Korea and Germany have climbed by double digits.But industry participants tell The Globe and Mail that the reasons for the decline in cars shipped to Canada include rising U.S. manufacturing costs owing to tariffs and a shift overseas to supply Canada – all results of the trade war ignited by Mr. Trump. Carney says he and Trump agreed to ‘intensify’ trade talks in phone call after latest tariff threatOpinion: There is no appeasing Donald Trump, or deterring himBrian Kingston, head of the Canadian Vehicle Manufacturers’ Association, which speaks for Ford Motor Co. F-N, General Motors GM-N and Stellantis NV STLA-N, said Mr. Trump’s tariff policies, which include 50-per-cent levies on imports of steel and aluminum from Canada, are driving up the cost of manufacturing in the U.S. and spurring those companies to supply Canada with an increased number of cars made in Mexico, South Korea or elsewhere, usually tariff-free.Those same companies also make cars overseas and ship them to the U.S. and pay just 15 per cent in tariffs. “This is protectionism in action,” Mr. Kingston said. “None of this should be a surprise to the U.S. administration. When you tariff your industries, companies will try and reduce their overall tariff burden, and the best way to do that now is to avoid U.S. manufacturing as a base, and service Canada from other jurisdictions where they have the ability to increase capacity.” He also attributed some of the decline to Canada’s tariffs. Canada began imposing the 25-per-cent tariffs in April, 2025, on U.S.-made cars, but spared the manufacturers that produce and invest in Canada. This remissions framework, itself a retaliation for Mr. Trump’s tariffs on autos, steel and aluminum, is designed to encourage manufacturing in Canada. The Canadian tariffs apply to U.S.-made cars that do not comply with the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement on free trade, and the non-Canadian and non-Mexican content of U.S.-made cars that are USMCA-compliant. Andrew King, managing partner of DesRosiers Automotive Consultants Inc., said the import numbers cited by the White House reflect what he is seeing. “The Canadian countertariffs have had a noticeable impact on vehicle sourcing – as they were designed to do,” Mr. King said. “A number of vehicle companies, especially from the group without duty remission programs, have switched sourcing of certain vehicles, if alternatives exist.” Subaru has moved some U.S. production destined for Canada to Japan, while Tesla now supplies Canada with cars made in China and Germany instead of the U.S. Mazda and Nissan have stopped U.S. production of cars for the Canadian market. These moves cost U.S. jobs and exports. From wine to whey to wigs, here are the Canadian goods targeted by Trump’s new 50% tariffs“Every manufacturer is doing it to some extent,” said Huw Williams, head of public affairs for the Canadian Automobile Dealers Association. Mr. Williams said the U.S. overlooked the loss of U.S. jobs and investment when it launched the trade war on Canada, the biggest buyer of U.S.-made cars. “They’re attacking their largest customer,” Mr. Williams said. “It’s not a particularly winning strategy, and you can see the results of that.” Baris Akyurek, vice-president of insights and intelligence at AutoTrader, an online marketplace for new and used cars, said a survey of users showed some preference for buying an anything-but-American-made car. These could include the Ontario-made Toyota Rav4 or Honda CR-V. Canada has not revealed the production or investment numbers carmakers must maintain in Canada to be eligible for the tariff rebate. Nor has it said if any of the Detroit-based carmakers are paying tariffs when they import cars to Canada. Ottawa last fall slashed the annual tariff-free import quotas of Stellantis by 50 per cent and GM by 24 per cent, citing “unacceptable decisions” to reduce manufacturing in Canada. GM closed its electric van plant in Ingersoll and reduced production at its Oshawa truck factory, while Stellantis moved planned production in Brampton to the U.S.

reddit.com
u/Surprisedbear0 — 4 days ago

Why can't we ban Telesales in Canada?

Have you ever or do you know someone who listens to tele-marketing offers? Given the current volume of scams occurring via phone calls, do you think it's worth asking our government to ban telemarketing? It's not like we'd be eliminating Canadian jobs as they are outsourced to call centres in other countries. Banks, credit card companies and telecoms can just figure out another way to find customers. No More Phone Sales!!!

edit: "tele-marketing" from telesales to prevent confusion with tesla sales.

thanks for the comments; here's some more info: according to Gemini, you can put your number on the National Do-Not-Call List to stop receiving telemarketing calls for 5 years, after which you need to re-register. However any company you've used within the past 18 months such as a credit card company, bank, credit unions, insurance, cellphone carriers, utilities etc, are allowed to contact you with product offerings. In addition, registered charities, political parties, newspapers and pollsters are not covered by the Do Not Call list and are allowed to call you.

reddit.com
u/Surprisedbear0 — 29 days ago

What is he thinking???

Everytime I read the latest statement by P. Hoekstra, I am struck by his complete lack of awareness that whatever comes out of his mouth just makes things worse. It makes me wonder if his belief in his approach, i.e. that his statements will eventually turn Canadian sentiment more favourably towards the USA, is because he is a) stupid b) a sociopath lacking the empathy gene c) arrogance personified who believes that the USA is the best and can't understand why we don't just concede or d) all of the above. What do you think?

reddit.com
u/Surprisedbear0 — 1 month ago

Can the index futures be manipulated to prop up broader US stock market?

I've been thinking about this for a few days. I'm looking for insight from redditors who might know. Google Ai's answer was the following:

Yes, it is theoretically and mechanically possible to use index futures to prop up the broader US stock market and this idea has long been discussed in the context of potential government or institutional market intervention. Because index futures are highly leveraged and closely linked to the underlying stock index, they are a generally more efficient tool than buying individual stocks directly, although actions on a large enough scale would leave a clear electronic record.

The mechanism relies on arbitrage. If a large buyer pushes index futures prices above the value implied by the underlying stocks, high frequency and institutional arbitrage traders typically respond by selling the futures and buying the consitutent stocks to capture the price difference. That buying pressure can lift the underlying index, while leverage allows a relatively small amount of capital posted as margin to control a much larger amount of market exposure.

"The Plunge Protection Team"

During Ronald Reagan's term, after the 1987 Black Monday crash, they created a blueprint for intervention, with former Fed Reserve Board member Robert Heller explaining that instead of flooding the system with liquidity during a crash, the Fed could just purchase stock index futures. Or, they could also direct major Wall Street primary dealer banks to aggressively buy stock index futures during extended overnight trading sessions. ~ from Investopedia and Wikipedia

"The US Federal Reserve is actively conducting Reserve Management Purchases of short-term Treasury bills at $10 billion/month to maintain "ample" cash reserves across the banking system and to stabilize short-term funding markets" ~The Federal Reserve

I am wondering about this because last Friday, when the US stock market was closed for their national holiday, the futures market was showing kind of negative for all US indexes, and slightly positive for S&P/TSX. But by (Green) Monday, things were quite different. Is it possible that the current administration is doing manipulation to plug a leaky bubble?

And if so, what are the implications?

reddit.com
u/Surprisedbear0 — 1 month ago
▲ 1 r/sp500

Can the index futures be manipulated to prop up broader US stock market?

I've been thinking about this for a few days. I'm looking for insight from redditors who might know. Google Ai's answer was the following:

Yes, it is theoretically and mechanically possible to use index futures to prop up the broader US stock market and this idea has long been discussed in the context of potential government or institutional market intervention. Because index futures are highly leveraged and closely linked to the underlying stock index, they are a generally more efficient tool than buying individual stocks directly, although actions on a large enough scale would leave a clear electronic record.

The mechanism relies on arbitrage. If a large buyer pushes index futures prices above the value implied by the underlying stocks, high frequency and institutional arbitrage traders typically respond by selling the futures and buying the consitutent stocks to capture the price difference. That buying pressure can lift the underlying index, while leverage allows a relatively small amount of capital posted as margin to control a much larger amount of market exposure.

"The Plunge Protection Team"

During Ronald Reagan's term, after the 1987 Black Monday crash, they created a blueprint for intervention, with former Fed Reserve Board member Robert Heller explaining that instead of flooding the system with liquidity during a crash, the Fed could just purchase stock index futures. Or, they could also direct major Wall Street primary dealer banks to aggressively buy stock index futures during extended overnight trading sessions. ~ from Investopedia and Wikipedia

"The US Federal Reserve is actively conducting Reserve Management Purchases of short-term Treasury bills at $10 billion/month to maintain "ample" cash reserves across the banking system and to stabilize short-term funding markets" ~The Federal Reserve

I am wondering about this because last Friday, when the US stock market was closed for their national holiday, the futures market was showing kind of negative for all US indexes, and slightly positive for S&P/TSX. But by (Green) Monday, things were quite different. Is it possible that the current administration is doing manipulation to plug a leaky bubble?

And if so, what are the implications?

reddit.com
u/Surprisedbear0 — 1 month ago

My Grohe shower diverter stopped working

my Grohe diverter model no 47689000

Hi folks,

I'm wondering if anyone can tell me if and how the mechanics of this diverter is broken. When in place, and I push the stem in, the water doesn't divert to shower, just keeps flowing out bath tap. For example, is the white plastic piece supposed to be attached to the metal stem? to the springs? (It's not right now) Everything is moving as it should, no calcification or sticking parts. I know I can order a replacement, but I am quite disappointed that this Grohe piece has stopped working after only 6 years and I want to make sure that the problem is indeed this part. Thanks for any help.

reddit.com
u/Surprisedbear0 — 3 months ago

Grohe diverter model 47689000

my Grohe shower's diverter model 47689000

Hi folks,

I'm wondering if anyone can tell me if and how the mechanics of this diverter is broken. When in place, and I push the stem in, the water doesn't divert to shower, just keeps flowing out bath tap. For example, is the white plastic piece supposed to be attached to the metal stem? to the springs? (It's not right now) Everything is moving as it should, no calcification or sticking parts. I know I can order a replacement, but I am quite disappointed that this Grohe piece has stopped working after only 6 years and I want to make sure that the problem is indeed this part. Thanks for any help.

reddit.com
u/Surprisedbear0 — 3 months ago