Should the liars have been more unlikeable and cruel to deliver a believable motive for -A in the show?
I know writers understandably don’t want to make their main characters too unlikable so the audience can still relate to them and the fact that the liars in the books were more unlikeable works there because it’s in book form with its perks as you can read their thoughts and understand their motivations
but I to this day I’m still wondering if it would’ve been better if the liars were more unlikeable and cruel to deliver a motive for A to go above and beyond to torture them
Mona hated them because of how they bullied her back then which is a good motive but pales compared to the books where her motives also included revenge for jenna and getting burned herself when she witness the tree house incident they even watered-down this for the show
Apart from the jenna thing and the bullying the girls didn't do any terrible things most of the bad things they end up doing are also because A made them
Idk i just think it would have been better if they had done some bad deeds together for the sake of creating good second A motives (cece as A didn't even have a good motive to begin with) like if they had tried to manipulate and take down melissa and ian but in a more devious way than what happened in the show with worse consequences for them then Melissa would have some solid motivation to hate them all for her husbands death and her miscarriage
if they wanted cece to be A from the beginning they should have focused on delivering her good motives to hate all the liars
Or would this not work for the show because the characters had to be kept likable