Sram red axs : Old gen vs new gen.
Dear everyone,
I recently got what seemed like a great deal on a previous-generation Cervélo R5 (2023), equipped with the previous-generation SRAM Red eTap AXS.
To be honest, I bought it on the spot because the frame looked absolutely stunning. I know painted frames are technically heavier than raw carbon, but let's be real — they look way cooler, and we're probably talking about, what, 50 grams?
I also knew that this generation of the R5 has an excellent reputation, and I assumed you can't really go wrong with a SRAM Red groupset.
However, I've since discovered that getting the groupset properly dialed in can be a bit of a headache. At first I had multiple chain drops, although things have improved and seem to have settled down now. Unfortunately, not before it left an ugly dent in my crank.
What I only realized recently is that this generation of Red AXS is actually quite heavy. If I'm not mistaken, it's around 150 grams heavier than the current Dura-Ace Di2.
I thought I was buying a lightweight climbing bike, but in the end it feels like I've ended up with a 7.3 kg tank instead.
Other than that, the group works wonderfully. Shifting is reliable and I can say I would strugle to go back to shimano system.
Am I overthinking this, or does anyone else feel that an R5 paired with first-generation Red AXS kind of defeats the purpose of such a lightweight frame? 😅
