

Confirmed Omen is a counterpart to Conquerors Haki. Reminder IMU possesses conquerors haki aswell, the strongest until now. Loki matched against 3 Omen + COC attacks of IMU.
This explains how overpowered IMU is, he already possesses absurdly strong conquerors Haki, stronger Haki than any Old Gen pirate including Domi reversi Rocks.
And on top of that, IMU possesses Omen which is a counter part to Conquerors Haki, meaning Omen is equally as strong as Conquerors Haki and wins who possesses either stronger Haki or stronger Omen.
Loki was matching and equally clashing against many named attacks of IMU who was using both Omen + Conquerors Haki.
I can't see Roger or Domi Reversi Rocks equally matching once or many times vs many named Conquerors Haki named attacks of IMU, nevermind named Omen + Conquerors Haki attacks of IMU.
Can HK Harald or Domi Reversi Rocks clash/match against many named Omen/Coc attacks from IMU like how Loki did??
reddit.comSo every time there is no big black lightning trail it is not conquerors haki coating.
Looks like Oda has finally set haki indicators. Now this explains why Zoro took so long to beat Lucci, he simply wasn't using conquerors haki.
Now it explains why Zoro Rengoku Onigiri and Lion death song didn't hurt Seraphim, he wasn't using any conquerors haki.
Looks like Oda might have heard about fans complaint about Conquerors and armament and decided to clarify and distinct them.
​
If what is being shown and translations that we have early access by now is correct, then Oda has set a distinction between when conquerors Haki is or is not being used.
Sommers states that there is moments where zoro didn't use conquerors haki and every time there is no black lightning when Zoro didn't use conquerors Haki.
The chapter confirms that the flame like aura on zoro swords is not conquerors haki, it is just armament , the long trailing of black lightning is conquerors haki, at the end of chapter when Zoro starts using conquerors haki coating is when long black lightning appears.
Meaning that Zoro didn't use conquerors haki when he faced the Seraphim since vs Seraphim not even once long black lightning did appear.
And at times vs King, Zoro didn't use conquerors haki as some panels there is lack of black lightning. When vs Lucci Zoro only used conquerors at the very last attack as before that there was only flame like aura on his swords or very small black lightning.
The conquerors haki version of Purgatory Onigiri does have black lightning trail and it is called King of hell Onigiri, and Zoro used the normal Onigiri when vs the Seraphim of Mihawk.
Which open windows about Luffy vs seraphim, vs Kizaru, vs Lucci and vs Gorosei and the absence of conquerors haki. There was no long trail black lightning vs them, principally vs Gorosei, seraphim and Lucci, so no conquerors haki was being used.
How can Kizaru have better defense than Yonkous, when he is less durable than more than half and have worse haki than any of them??
Like how exactly without plot inconsistent from Oda, that it makes sense that he possesses better defense than them, when his defense is solely using his own body and haki??
Who got the stronger Haki, Loki or Luffy??
Just wondering
Which defense is tougher/more durable?
These flairs in here are hilarious.