More context: https://www.reddit.com/r/Presidentialpoll/comments/1vmkqld/recontructed_america_preview_of_the_2014_midterms/

It's time for the 2014 Midterms! Here is the Senate Election!

Let's now discuss the Senate.

Current state of the Senate

Senate Majority Leader Neil Abercrombie succeeded former leader Daniel Akaka after he retired from the Senate. For the first time ever, a Senator from a State was succeeded by another Senator from the same State as the Senate Majority Leader. Despite this historic achievement, Abercrombie didn't have time to just relax and be happy with what he accomplished; he had to rule the Senate. Even with the Commonwealth Coalition and the Republican Party being irritating to him, he was able to help President Ford with his legislation without a lot of difficulty. The friction within the CC probably helped, and that Faction didn't put up as much fight as it did under Akaka. However, the Senator from Hawaii knows that the PLP's ability to win seats in the 2014 Midterms is pretty much nonexistent, as the Republicans only have 5 seats to defend when the People's Liberals battle to keep 6 times as many. If Abercrombie's goal is to gain a seat, his strategy may be to lose. What the Senate Majority Leader should probably do is go all in on a defense. He is not at any risk of losing his leadership, but his influence may be damaged if the coalition isn't held together.

Even if Abercrombie became the first Senate Majority Leader to gain that position after a Senator from the same State, Oliver North became the first Senate Leader in general to do so. He has been the Leader of the Republican Party in the Senate for 6 years now, and he has grown to be an efficient leader at that. Not to say that he became bipartisan, but he knows when to strike. North's prospects look good this time around, but he knows that he needs to be not too arrogant so everything doesn't blow up in his face. The Republicans are very likely to gain seats in the Senate, sure, but Senator North may want to win big so that he isn't seen as somebody who is all talk. He knows that Ford's influence in the Republican Party shouldn't go any further, and if the Party is to stand on any principles, they need to be established now. Senate Minority Leader North may try to shape this path in his own vision, or he may take a much more pragmatic approach and, although influential, let the Party itself figure everything out. He just needs victory.

There are Third Parties that look to win at least one seat in the Senate, but again, after the Great Merger, such a possibility has been less and less likely. Still, the Green Worker's Party, the Pirate Party, the Prosperity Party, and the Green Party all look to make a breakthrough. The environment is not in their favor, but who knows?

(When you vote for either Party, please write in the comments which Faction are you Voting for/Support the Most. That way I can play with Faction dynamic and know what do you want.)

Once again we are in the Era of Factions. So the success of Factions matters as much as the success of Parties as a whole. Here is the reminder of all factions in both the Republican Party and the People's Liberal Party as a list:

Factions of the People's Liberal Party:

Commonwealth Coalition

• Social Policy: Center Right to Far Left
• Economic Policy: Left to Far Left
• Ideology: Socialism, Democratic Socialism, Wealth Redistribution, Dovish, Big Government, Populism, Reformism, Protectionism, Technoskepticism, Anti-Muslim (partially), Anti-Jewish (partially), Anti-Religion (partially)
• Influence: Major
• Attitude towards Ford: Anti-Ford
• Leader:

Governor of Massachusetts

Nelsonian Coalition

• Social Policy: Center to Left
• Economic Policy: Center Right to Center Left
• Ideology: Neoliberalism, Fiscal Responsibility, Free Market, Interventionism, Technocracy, Futurism, Fordism, Social Progressivism
• Influence: Major
• Attitude towards Ford: Pro-Ford
• Leader:

The President of the United States

Rainbow League

• Social Policy: Center Left to Far Left
• Economic Policy: Center to Left
• Ideology: Social Democracy, LGBTQ Rights, Equity, Pro Drug Legalization, Immigrant Interests, Dovish, Feminism, Pro-Choice
• Influence: Moderate
• Attitude towards Ford: Mixed, Mostly Anti-Ford
• Leader:

Senator from Connecticut

National Progressive Caucus

• Social Policy: Left
• Economic Policy: Center Left to Left
• Ideology: Establishment Progressivism, Protectionism, State Capitalism, Gun Control, Reformism, Rehabilitation of Prisoners, Abortion Reform
• Influence: Moderate
• Attitude towards Ford: Mixed, Mostly Pro-Ford
• Leader:

The Vice President of the United States

Rational Liberal Caucus

• Social Policy: Center Left to Left
• Economic Policy: Center Left to Left
• Ideology: Progressivism, Fiscal Responsibility, Mild Protectionism, Gun Reform, Rational Foreign Policy, Rehabilitation of Prisoners, Moderate on Abortion
• Attitude towards Ford: Pro-Ford
• Influence: Minor
• Leader:

Senator from West Virginia (Retires after this Election)

Third Way Coalition

• Social Policy: Center Right to Center Left
• Economic Policy: Center Right to Center
• Ideology: Third Way, Moderately Hawkish, Free Market, Fiscal Responsibility, "Safe, Legal and Rare", Pro War on Drugs, Tough on Crime
• Attitude towards Ford: Mostly Pro-Ford
• Influence: Minor
• Leader:

Senator from Arkansas (Retires after this Election)

Factions of the Republican Party:

Libertarian League

• Social Policy: Center to Left
• Economic Policy: Right to Far Right
• Ideology: Libertarianism, Small Government, State’s Rights, Gun Rights, Pro Drug Legalization, Dovish/Hawkish, Free Trade
• Influence: Major
• Attitude towards Ford: Mostly Pro-Ford
• Leader:

Senator from New Mexico

American Solidarity

• Social Policy: Center Left to Right
• Economic Policy: Center Left to Left
• Ideology: State Capitalism, Latin American Interests, Christian Democracy, Reformism, Immigrant Interests, Social Moderation/Progressivism.
• Influence: Major
• Attitude towards Ford: Mixed, Mostly Anti-Ford
• Leader:

Former Vice President of the United States

National Union Caucus

• Social Policy: Center to Right
• Economic Policy: Center Right
• Ideology: Neo-Conservatism, Mild State Capitalism, Hawkish, Pro War on Drugs, Tough on Crime Policies, Free Trade
• Influence: Moderate
• Attitude towards Ford: Mostly Pro-Ford
• Leader:

Senator from Indiana

National Conservative Caucus

• Social Policy: Right to Far Right
• Economic Policy: Left to Right
• Ideology: America First, Protectionism, Isolationism, Hawkishness, Religious Right, Christian Identity, Anti-Immigration
• Influence: Minor
• Attitude towards Ford: Anti-Ford
• Leader:

Senate Minority Leader

American Dry League

• Social Policy: Center to Right
• Economic Policy: Center to Center Right
• Ideology: Prohibitionism, pro War on Drugs, Temperance, “anti-Vice”
• Influence: Minor
• Attitude towards Ford: Anti-Ford
• Leader:

Senator from Pennsylvania

View Poll

More context: https://www.reddit.com/r/Presidentialpoll/comments/1vmkqld/recontructed_america_preview_of_the_2014_midterms/

It's time for the 2014 Midterms! Here is the House Election!

Let's take a look at the House of Representatives first.

Current state of the House

You would think that Speaker Norm Dicks's job shouldn't be that difficult. He is the Speaker under a popular President, and the country largely likes where everything is going. However, it is never easy for a Speaker. Dicks has to not only deal with the bills but also with the Party that is arguing with itself on what it should represent. The Speaker of the House needs to make sure that his own Faction doesn't rebel, which has been really hard recently, while trying to put up with the President's bs that he pushes. Dicks isn't a lackey for Ford; he is a servant of the people; he isn't putting a rubber stamp on everything that the President wants. There are also those Republicans who are annoying to him and make his position even more difficult. The Speaker has to juggle all these things together and make sure nothing falls. If it does, he may lose his job, and who knows who will succeed him? He needs to keep as many seats as he can to have a better shot to be able to balance everything together until he can't. What the voters need to decide is if Norm Dicks is worth it.

The House Minority Leader, Nick Fish, is a man who seems to be made for politics. It is in his blood. And so him working alongside everyone in such a political theater as Congress is something he is good at. That doesn't mean that his job is all sunshine and rainbows. After all, he has never been the Speaker, never held that gavel, and never had to actually control the process. Fish isn't the most popular leader; he doesn't even have a lot of influence right now, and he has to work with what he has. With all that being said, it is not like the Republican Party is the most united coalition. There are those who think Harrison Ford needs to be taught a lesson and those who think he is doing a tremendous job, despite the Party affiliation. The House Minority Leader himself is somebody more skeptical of the President, but he is also a pragmatist. Nick Fish knows that he needs a win if he wants his career to go anywhere. He knows that winning the House outright is a mountain of a task right now, but at least substantial gains would help.

As usual, there are those Third Parties. The biggest is the Green Worker's Party with 31 seats in the House. They made some controversy as some of its members were involved in the attempts of insurrections of state governments. That won't make them popular with Moderates, but their hardcore supporters are more loyal than ever. Who cares if they are called radicals? Maybe the Green Worker's Party is something that will bring down Ford's regime? Well, if you believe in these things, you maybe would like to support them.

The Pirate Party gained in the 2012 House Elections despite unusual Nominees for President and Vice President. With 14 seats right now, they are looking to increase their influence. With a clearer position, yet not the clearest position, of supporting free tech and its progress, they want President Ford to be even more open to the technologies and what they bring. That is an interesting approach, that's for sure.

The Prosperity Party benefited from Clancy Brown's relatively strong performance and stands with 12 seats in Congress. Many don't predict dominating results for it this time around, but the Prosperity Party has its loyal supporters who support their ideas of Center-Right Populism.

The Green Party is seen as a ghost of its former self. Since the Green Worker's Party formation, the regular Greens continue to lose and lose support. They only have 6 seats in their possession, and if they don't improve, they can face the same fate that the Patriot Party saw (btw, the Patriot Party literally is done after being wiped out in 2012, and it didn't produce any serious Candidates this time around).

(When you vote for either Party, please write in the comments which Faction are you Voting for/Support the Most. That way I can play with Faction dynamic and know what do you want.)

Once again we are in the Era of Factions. So the success of Factions matters as much as the success of Parties as a whole. Here is the reminder of all factions in both the Republican Party and the People's Liberal Party as a list:

Factions of the People's Liberal Party:

Commonwealth Coalition

• Social Policy: Center Right to Far Left
• Economic Policy: Left to Far Left
• Ideology: Socialism, Democratic Socialism, Wealth Redistribution, Dovish, Big Government, Populism, Reformism, Protectionism, Technoskepticism, Anti-Muslim (partially), Anti-Jewish (partially), Anti-Religion (partially)
• Influence: Major
• Attitude towards Ford: Anti-Ford
• Leader:

Governor of Massachusetts

Nelsonian Coalition

• Social Policy: Center to Left
• Economic Policy: Center Right to Center Left
• Ideology: Neoliberalism, Fiscal Responsibility, Free Market, Interventionism, Technocracy, Futurism, Fordism, Social Progressivism
• Influence: Major
• Attitude towards Ford: Pro-Ford
• Leader:

The President of the United States

Rainbow League

• Social Policy: Center Left to Far Left
• Economic Policy: Center to Left
• Ideology: Social Democracy, LGBTQ Rights, Equity, Pro Drug Legalization, Immigrant Interests, Dovish, Feminism, Pro-Choice
• Influence: Moderate
• Attitude towards Ford: Mixed, Mostly Anti-Ford
• Leader:

Senator from Connecticut

National Progressive Caucus

• Social Policy: Left
• Economic Policy: Center Left to Left
• Ideology: Establishment Progressivism, Protectionism, State Capitalism, Gun Control, Reformism, Rehabilitation of Prisoners, Abortion Reform
• Influence: Moderate
• Attitude towards Ford: Mixed, Mostly Pro-Ford
• Leader:

The Vice President of the United States

Rational Liberal Caucus

• Social Policy: Center Left to Left
• Economic Policy: Center Left to Left
• Ideology: Progressivism, Fiscal Responsibility, Mild Protectionism, Gun Reform, Rational Foreign Policy, Rehabilitation of Prisoners, Moderate on Abortion
• Attitude towards Ford: Pro-Ford
• Influence: Minor
• Leader:

Senator from West Virginia (Retires after this Election)

Third Way Coalition

• Social Policy: Center Right to Center Left
• Economic Policy: Center Right to Center
• Ideology: Third Way, Moderately Hawkish, Free Market, Fiscal Responsibility, "Safe, Legal and Rare", Pro War on Drugs, Tough on Crime
• Attitude towards Ford: Mostly Pro-Ford
• Influence: Minor
• Leader:

Senator from Arkansas (Retires after this Election)

Factions of the Republican Party:

Libertarian League

• Social Policy: Center to Left
• Economic Policy: Right to Far Right
• Ideology: Libertarianism, Small Government, State’s Rights, Gun Rights, Pro Drug Legalization, Dovish/Hawkish, Free Trade
• Influence: Major
• Attitude towards Ford: Mostly Pro-Ford
• Leader:

Senator from New Mexico

American Solidarity

• Social Policy: Center Left to Right
• Economic Policy: Center Left to Left
• Ideology: State Capitalism, Latin American Interests, Christian Democracy, Reformism, Immigrant Interests, Social Moderation/Progressivism.
• Influence: Major
• Attitude towards Ford: Mixed, Mostly Anti-Ford
• Leader:

Former Vice President of the United States

National Union Caucus

• Social Policy: Center to Right
• Economic Policy: Center Right
• Ideology: Neo-Conservatism, Mild State Capitalism, Hawkish, Pro War on Drugs, Tough on Crime Policies, Free Trade
• Influence: Moderate
• Attitude towards Ford: Mostly Pro-Ford
• Leader:

Senator from Indiana

National Conservative Caucus

• Social Policy: Right to Far Right
• Economic Policy: Left to Right
• Ideology: America First, Protectionism, Isolationism, Hawkishness, Religious Right, Christian Identity, Anti-Immigration
• Influence: Minor
• Attitude towards Ford: Anti-Ford
• Leader:

Senate Minority Leader

American Dry League

• Social Policy: Center to Right
• Economic Policy: Center to Center Right
• Ideology: Prohibitionism, pro War on Drugs, Temperance, “anti-Vice”
• Influence: Minor
• Attitude towards Ford: Anti-Ford
• Leader:

Senator from Pennsylvania

View Poll

President Harrison Ford had to govern through some important events in his Second Term. He is a popular President, but not the one who doesn't have his critics. Not only the opposing Party, the Republican Party, has a goal of limiting his influence and somewhat controlling him, but some in his own Party. The People's Liberal Party is still divided over Policy. With that being said, the President had an easier time passing legislation during this term than the previous one. This is largely due to the opposition inside the PLP to him being less organized because of the internal disputes. Now it is time for the Midterms. What happens here may influence Ford's Term going forward. It also may set up what is going to happen in 2016, as the country will be deciding on who will succeed him. But now is now, and the 2014 Midterms are at hand.

(Check this post for more context about Ford's Second Term so far: https://www.reddit.com/r/Presidentialpoll/s/uLGTHLgxvp )

Let's take a look at the House of Representatives first.

Current state of the House

You would think that Speaker Norm Dicks's job shouldn't be that difficult. He is the Speaker under a popular President, and the country largely likes where everything is going. However, it is never easy for a Speaker. Dicks has to not only deal with the bills but also with the Party that is arguing with itself on what it should represent. The Speaker of the House needs to make sure that his own Faction doesn't rebel, which has been really hard recently, while trying to put up with the President's bs that he pushes. Dicks isn't a lackey for Ford; he is a servant of the people; he isn't putting a rubber stamp on everything that the President wants. There are also those Republicans who are annoying to him and make his position even more difficult. The Speaker has to juggle all these things together and make sure nothing falls. If it does, he may lose his job, and who knows who will succeed him? He needs to keep as many seats as he can to have a better shot to be able to balance everything together until he can't. What the voters need to decide is if Norm Dicks is worth it.

The House Minority Leader, Nick Fish, is a man who seems to be made for politics. It is in his blood. And so him working alongside everyone in such a political theater as Congress is something he is good at. That doesn't mean that his job is all sunshine and rainbows. After all, he has never been the Speaker, never held that gavel, and never had to actually control the process. Fish isn't the most popular leader; he doesn't even have a lot of influence right now, and he has to work with what he has. With all that being said, it is not like the Republican Party is the most united coalition. There are those who think Harrison Ford needs to be taught a lesson and those who think he is doing a tremendous job, despite the Party affiliation. The House Minority Leader himself is somebody more skeptical of the President, but he is also a pragmatist. Nick Fish knows that he needs a win if he wants his career to go anywhere. He knows that winning the House outright is a mountain of a task right now, but at least substantial gains would help.

As usual, there are those Third Parties. The biggest is the Green Worker's Party with 31 seats in the House. They made some controversy as some of its members were involved in the attempts of insurrections of state governments. That won't make them popular with Moderates, but their hardcore supporters are more loyal than ever. Who cares if they are called radicals? Maybe the Green Worker's Party is something that will bring down Ford's regime? Well, if you believe in these things, you maybe would like to support them.

The Pirate Party gained in the 2012 House Elections despite unusual Nominees for President and Vice President. With 14 seats right now, they are looking to increase their influence. With a clearer position, yet not the clearest position, of supporting free tech and its progress, they want President Ford to be even more open to the technologies and what they bring. That is an interesting approach, that's for sure.

The Prosperity Party benefited from Clancy Brown's relatively strong performance and stands with 12 seats in Congress. Many don't predict dominating results for it this time around, but the Prosperity Party has its loyal supporters who support their ideas of Center-Right Populism.

The Green Party is seen as a ghost of its former self. Since the Green Worker's Party formation, the regular Greens continue to lose and lose support. They only have 6 seats in their possession, and if they don't improve, they can face the same fate that the Patriot Party saw (btw, the Patriot Party literally is done after being wiped out in 2012, and it didn't produce any serious Candidates this time around).

Let's now discuss the Senate.

Current state of the Senate

Senate Majority Leader Neil Abercrombie succeeded former leader Daniel Akaka after he retired from the Senate. For the first time ever, a Senator from a State was succeeded by another Senator from the same State as the Senate Majority Leader. Despite this historic achievement, Abercrombie didn't have time to just relax and be happy with what he accomplished; he had to rule the Senate. Even with the Commonwealth Coalition and the Republican Party being irritating to him, he was able to help President Ford with his legislation without a lot of difficulty. The friction within the CC probably helped, and that Faction didn't put up as much fight as it did under Akaka. However, the Senator from Hawaii knows that the PLP's ability to win seats in the 2014 Midterms is pretty much nonexistent, as the Republicans only have 5 seats to defend when the People's Liberals battle to keep 6 times as many. If Abercrombie's goal is to gain a seat, his strategy may be to lose. What the Senate Majority Leader should probably do is go all in on a defense. He is not at any risk of losing his leadership, but his influence may be damaged if the coalition isn't held together.

Even if Abercrombie became the first Senate Majority Leader to gain that position after a Senator from the same State, Oliver North became the first Senate Leader in general to do so. He has been the Leader of the Republican Party in the Senate for 6 years now, and he has grown to be an efficient leader at that. Not to say that he became bipartisan, but he knows when to strike. North's prospects look good this time around, but he knows that he needs to be not too arrogant so everything doesn't blow up in his face. The Republicans are very likely to gain seats in the Senate, sure, but Senator North may want to win big so that he isn't seen as somebody who is all talk. He knows that Ford's influence in the Republican Party shouldn't go any further, and if the Party is to stand on any principles, they need to be established now. Senate Minority Leader North may try to shape this path in his own vision, or he may take a much more pragmatic approach and, although influential, let the Party itself figure everything out. He just needs victory.

There are Third Parties that look to win at least one seat in the Senate, but again, after the Great Merger, such a possibility has been less and less likely. Still, the Green Worker's Party, the Pirate Party, the Prosperity Party, and the Green Party all look to make a breakthrough. The environment is not in their favor, but who knows?

Once again we are in the Era of Factions. So the success of Factions matters as much as the success of Parties as a whole. Here is the reminder of all factions in both the Republican Party and the People's Liberal Party as a list:

Factions of the People's Liberal Party:

Commonwealth Coalition

• Social Policy: Center Right to Far Left
• Economic Policy: Left to Far Left
• Ideology: Socialism, Democratic Socialism, Wealth Redistribution, Dovish, Big Government, Populism, Reformism, Protectionism, Technoskepticism, Anti-Muslim (partially), Anti-Jewish (partially), Anti-Religion (partially)
• Influence: Major
• Attitude towards Ford: Anti-Ford
• Leader:

Governor of Massachusetts

Nelsonian Coalition

• Social Policy: Center to Left
• Economic Policy: Center Right to Center Left
• Ideology: Neoliberalism, Fiscal Responsibility, Free Market, Interventionism, Technocracy, Futurism, Fordism, Social Progressivism
• Influence: Major
• Attitude towards Ford: Pro-Ford
• Leader:

The President of the United States

Rainbow League

• Social Policy: Center Left to Far Left
• Economic Policy: Center to Left
• Ideology: Social Democracy, LGBTQ Rights, Equity, Pro Drug Legalization, Immigrant Interests, Dovish, Feminism, Pro-Choice
• Influence: Moderate
• Attitude towards Ford: Mixed, Mostly Anti-Ford
• Leader:

Senator from Connecticut

National Progressive Caucus

• Social Policy: Left
• Economic Policy: Center Left to Left
• Ideology: Establishment Progressivism, Protectionism, State Capitalism, Gun Control, Reformism, Rehabilitation of Prisoners, Abortion Reform
• Influence: Moderate
• Attitude towards Ford: Mixed, Mostly Pro-Ford
• Leader:

The Vice President of the United States

Rational Liberal Caucus

• Social Policy: Center Left to Left
• Economic Policy: Center Left to Left
• Ideology: Progressivism, Fiscal Responsibility, Mild Protectionism, Gun Reform, Rational Foreign Policy, Rehabilitation of Prisoners, Moderate on Abortion
• Attitude towards Ford: Pro-Ford
• Influence: Minor
• Leader:

Senator from West Virginia (Retires after this Election)

Third Way Coalition

• Social Policy: Center Right to Center Left
• Economic Policy: Center Right to Center
• Ideology: Third Way, Moderately Hawkish, Free Market, Fiscal Responsibility, "Safe, Legal and Rare", Pro War on Drugs, Tough on Crime
• Attitude towards Ford: Mostly Pro-Ford
• Influence: Minor
• Leader:

Senator from Arkansas (Retires after this Election)

Factions of the Republican Party:

Libertarian League

• Social Policy: Center to Left
• Economic Policy: Right to Far Right
• Ideology: Libertarianism, Small Government, State’s Rights, Gun Rights, Pro Drug Legalization, Dovish/Hawkish, Free Trade
• Influence: Major
• Attitude towards Ford: Mostly Pro-Ford
• Leader:

Senator from New Mexico

American Solidarity

• Social Policy: Center Left to Right
• Economic Policy: Center Left to Left
• Ideology: State Capitalism, Latin American Interests, Christian Democracy, Reformism, Immigrant Interests, Social Moderation/Progressivism.
• Influence: Major
• Attitude towards Ford: Mixed, Mostly Anti-Ford
• Leader:

Former Vice President of the United States

National Union Caucus

• Social Policy: Center to Right
• Economic Policy: Center Right
• Ideology: Neo-Conservatism, Mild State Capitalism, Hawkish, Pro War on Drugs, Tough on Crime Policies, Free Trade
• Influence: Moderate
• Attitude towards Ford: Mostly Pro-Ford
• Leader:

Senator from Indiana

National Conservative Caucus

• Social Policy: Right to Far Right
• Economic Policy: Left to Right
• Ideology: America First, Protectionism, Isolationism, Hawkishness, Religious Right, Christian Identity, Anti-Immigration
• Influence: Minor
• Attitude towards Ford: Anti-Ford
• Leader:

Senate Minority Leader

American Dry League

• Social Policy: Center to Right
• Economic Policy: Center to Center Right
• Ideology: Prohibitionism, pro War on Drugs, Temperance, “anti-Vice”
• Influence: Minor
• Attitude towards Ford: Anti-Ford
• Leader:

Senator from Pennsylvania

(When you vote for either Party, please write in the comments which Faction are you Voting for/Support the Most. That way I can play with Faction dynamic and know what do you want.)

The Midterm Polls will be up very soon!

After the bitter race, Harrison Ford became the second Liberal to be Re-Elected as President since Nelson Rockefeller. Despite the aggressive campaign of his opponent Curtis Sliwa, President Ford was able to dominantly win in a combination of an improving Economy and good debate performances in the latest Presidential debates. However, this didn't mean that Ford's job would become easier. The President actually had a lot of stuff on his plate, some that were widely supported and others that were much more controversial. So let's take a look at what happened.

President Harrison Ford

Foreign Policy

Just a month after talking office for the second time, Harrison Ford had to deal with a crisis. The President appointed Leon Panetta as the new Secretary of State after Graham Allison Announced retirement. This and other replacements were seen as a move to refresh the Administration a little bit after 4 years. Allison had to feel relieved that he stepped down due to the events that followed. Panetta was in a car, going to the meeting with the President of the United Federation of China (UFC) Zhao Xiaolan when another car ran into his. The shoot-out started to take place with explosives being in the possession of the attackers. Secretary Panetta received minor injuries while three officers died along with two civilians and 5 out of 7 attackers.

The attack took place in Virginia, where Governor Powell immediately declared a state of emergency as the police received other calls of possible attacks taking place. The authorities started the investigation into the event by interrogating the attackers. After some time, it was revealed that the perpetrators of the attack were members of the group called "Marg-e Khoda", or "Death of God," which is a radical militant group of the Iranian government and was recognized as a terrorist organization in many Western countries.

Secretary of State Leon Panetta discussing the attempt on his life

Americans wanted answers, and the US government demanded them from Communist Iran. However, the Iranian government responded by claiming that the Marg-e Khoda had full authority to fight "the imperialist forces" all over the world while also claiming that the government itself didn't attack the US. The Administration revealed that at least one of the attackers was an active member of the Iranian government. To say that the US didn't believe Iran would be is an understatement. The US doubts were made even stronger when the intelligence revealed that the same group had similar plots to assassinate other government members, including the President himself.

This prompted some unrest on the streets in the country as some Communist and Radical Socialist groups started to attack the police officers in different states. They claimed that "the Revolution has started. Join us to take over the country for the proletariat and destroy every member of the bourgeoisie." In some states, like California and Illinois, there were attempts at an insurrection where these groups tried to take the government buildings by force. As a result of these attacks, multiple policemen died, and many more were injured.

The government responded by passing the Authorization for Use of Military Force in Iran. This gave the Ford Administration the ability to conduct full operations in Iran against the Communist government. This included airstrikes on the military targets along with limited deployment of soldiers. At home the state of emergency was declared, and the insurrectionists were arrested. Among those arrested were even the members of the Green Worker's Party, and at least one of the insurrectionists was from the People's Liberal Party's Commonwealth Coalition. By the time of the 2014 Midterms, the national emergency is no longer in effect, but it still had an influence on how the people see the government.

One of the insurrectionists being arrested by the police in New York

The military campaign in Iran was organized by the man whose attack started this whole thing - Secretary of State Leon Panetta. As a part of the strategy, the US used the help of the Afghanistani and Kurdish governments to conduct the operations along with several groups inside Iran fighting against the communist government. The US also started the blockade of the Iranian ports to force Iranian hands. So far the strategy seems effective as the Anti-Communist forces in Iran are gaining ground while the Economy of the Communists looks to be in bad shape. However, some question the purpose of what some call "the Iranian War". The government made it clear that their goal is to catch those who are responsible for the attacks on the US and to stop the totalitarian government of Iran.

At home the big development was the arrest of former Representative and Presidential Candidate Angela Davis for helping people involved in insurrection attempts in California. After the arrest, Davis started calling for "the tyrant Ford" to be "deposed for the treason and persecuted to the fullest extent." The DOJ later revealed that Davis talked to the members of the Marg-e Khoda, but the full extent of their discussions isn't known.

This caused friction in the Commonwealth Coalition. Some claimed that the President was acting like an authoritarian by arresting former Representative Davis and called for her immediate release. Others, however, like former leader of the Faction and Davis's Running Mate in the 1980 Election, Donald Trump, who just left the US Senate, expressed disappointment with the actions of Davis. They asked the supporters of the Socialist/Democratic Socialist cause to influence the government peacefully. However, pretty much all the CC members claimed that the government went after those who were just protesting by talking about stories of separate individuals who were close to the attacks in California and Illinois "just making sure their voices are heard."

Angela David being interviewed while in custody

Another development in the PLP's largest faction is growing Anti-Muslim, Anti-Jewish, and Anti-Religion rhetoric. The Iranian Communist government has made itself infamous for its persecution of Muslims, Jews, and other religious groups in the country. In the eyes of the government, the religion is a stain on Iran's imperialist past. The human rights advocates claim that Iran is the worst place for Muslims to travel to, as a series of mass hangings were documented since the start of the millennium. With a mass unrest in the country, a few influential CC members started claiming that the US government is controlled by a small group of Muslims and Jews who lead the country into wars.

Although such a claim isn't widespread in the Faction, there is an increasing number of people arguing that Muslims and Jews are influencing American politics. They point to groups such as AIPPAC, or the American Israel-Palestine Public Affairs Committee, as examples of politicians being influenced by religious organizations. These CC members say that such organizations make America act not in its interest, but in the interest of those foreign and religious entities. Many criticize such claims as being xenophobia and causing religious divisions in the United States. The number of attacks on Muslims and Jews in the US has increased since 2012, and many point to this as the result of such claims. Many think that this can result in many people distancing themselves from the Faction.

Freshman Representative Tucker Carlson of California talking about the dangers of AIPPAC

The situation with Iran isn't the only important Foreign Policy development since the beginning of Ford's Second Term. A series of terrorist attacks took place around the country with bombings of malls in different major cities. Initially, the public thought that it was the work of Iranians. However, after the investigation, the intelligence found no connection between these attacks and the Iranian government. The people committing these acts of terrorism were of different nationalities, and so the government had a hard time finding out the reason for the attacks.

Despite that, the CIA discovered that most of the terrorists were funded by a group called the Asian Order Brotherhood (AOB), which is connected to the Provisional Government of Southern Mongolia (PGSM). That is the government of the Jin territory occupied by the Mongolian State. In response, the US demanded that the Mongolian State organize an investigation in Jin about the ties of AOB and PGSM with the terrorists. The Mongolian States denied the demand.

President Ford waited for weeks to make a decision on what to do next, but the Mongolians made the decision for him. They invaded the Jin territory that was under control of the UFC. The United States made a decision to get involved in the conflict. This proved to be controversial as the President justified the move with an agreement to protect Chinese territorial integrity. The issue was that the Mongolians only attacked the Jin region that the US technically didn't recognize as a part of China.

President of the UFC Zhao Xiaolan talking about the War

At the beginning, the US successfully pushed the Mongolians back off the Chinese-controlled territory. However, when the army decided to move forward to the area that was controlled by the Mongolian State, the Mongolian army revealed a secret weapon. It was the first weaponized exosuits that the world has ever seen. The US army has shown prototypes of such weapons before, but nobody thought that this technology was close to being possible. Mongolia having them was a complete shock to the world. The suit was later discovered to be controlled by two people in one suit operating the technology using AI.

The Mongolian State effectively used this to stall the progress of American and Chinese advances. In fact, as of right now, there is no end to this conflict in sight. This opened up the Administration for attacks from the left and right. Some criticize the country's involvement in the conflict to begin with and argue that the United States should withdraw. Others talk about how the Administration wasn't prepared for the conflict, and the country is paying for it. As a result, the area of Ford's Policy that is viewed the most negatively.

Recreation of the photo of one of the exosuits taken during a battle

Economy & Elections

Taking a break from Foreign Policy, the area where Americans view President Ford the most positively is the Economic recovery. Despite the worries at the start of the Iranian crisis, since the later part of 2012, the Economy has been strong, and by most accounts, it rebounded from the Recession. The GDP is rising, and unemployment is decreasing. Many contribute the improvement to the Economic Phoenix Act as one of the big reasons why the Economy is doing so well despite it all.

This, along with the rally-around-the-flag effect due to the Iranian crisis, positively influenced the PLP's electoral results in the 2013 Elections. To make it sweeter for Ford, all three top races went Nelsonial Coalition's way. To begin with, Ford's opponent in 2012, Curtis Sliwa, lost Re-Election efforts in New York City's Mayoral Election to Raymond Kelly despite strong performance from the Green Worker's Party's Nominee. In Virginia, Patricia Horoho was Elected as the new Governor of the State after Michael Powell wasn't eligible to run for Re-Election. And in New Jersey, Representative John Adler defeated Thomas Kean Jr. in the Governorship race.

Mayor Kelly talking to the reporters

It should be noted that even with this optimism around the Economic recovery, many Progressives, a lot of whom are from the Commonwealth Coalition, point to the widening of the wage gap in the country. They argue that the Economy seems good on paper because the upper class is gaining a lot while everyone else stays the same. Despite many economists debunking this narrative and claiming that everyone is seeing the rise in wages, this rhetoric is becoming increasingly influential among Progressives.

This is probably influenced by bigger and bigger skepticism of AI in the country. It seems nowadays that AI is everywhere, and you can't escape it. Many Progressives argue that President Ford's fascination with AI is too large, and he should pay more attention to the workers who are losing jobs because of the growing usage of new technologies. Interestingly enough, more people who are skeptical of AI are those who view themselves as Liberals, while Republicans are more welcoming of the AI.

Senator Tom Hayden of California talking about the dangers of the AI

If we don't look at just AI, we can see America living through a technological boom and an era of digitalization. Devices are more cutting-edge, paperwork is less needed, and cities are sophisticated. Even in small towns, it is not rare to see people pay for their groceries with credit cards that are on their phones. The job of law enforcement is easier as they can do their job without the need to write tons of papers all the time. Life is becoming easier for most Americans.

The President said that he wants robots to be more available to people, and as the promised robots powered by AI are getting sold more and more, the dream of futuristic America may be truly coming sooner rather than later. Still, even with these robots being sold more frequently, the Progressives point to the gap between the purchases of robots among the rich and the poor. Indeed, the prices for the robots to people's households are seen as luxury by many Americans. However, the technological progress that the country sees during this decade makes most people wonder what technology can't do.

A robot powered by AI cleaning dishes

Social Issues

Some take this question to... interesting arguments. There are those who are skeptical of technological progress, there are those who love robots, and then there are those who... love robots. America sees the phenomenon of people not only buying robots for work at the household but also because of romantic or even sexual affection. Data suggests that mostly a small percentage of young single men use their robots for such activities. Still, most Americans view such things as a problem that needs to be fixed. However, some activists support the idea that maybe people could truly love robots. These people support such radical measures as allowing people to marry their robots. However, this still remains on the fringe of activist movements, and nothing may come from this.

With robots being more commonly used in the everyday lives of Americans, many are thinking of the idea of how this new technological innovation can be used to not just make people's lives easier but also help those who are unfortunate to suffer from disabilities. Some Congresspeople proposed to provide tax exemptions to businesses that produce robotic prostheses and modern hearing devices. Others suggest the government provide subsidies to such businesses. And then there are those who want to nationalize the production of this market so that it would be fully financed by the government and implemented into the National Healthcare System.

The first option is favored by about half of the Republicans and a minority of People's Liberals. The second option is favored by close to the other half of the Republican Party and the plurality of the PLP, President Ford included. The third option is the one that the most Progressive members of both Parties support, but some in the National Conservative Caucus Faction of the Republican Party are also for the idea. Right now the discussion on this initiative is conducted in Congress, and many believe that it won't get anywhere until the 2014 Midterms.

Secretary of HHS Robert F. Kennedy Jr. talking about the possibility of implementing the robotic prostheses business into the NHS

Another Social Policy that divides the American public is Abortion. Although most of the people view the practice as a valuable necessity, and so they are supportive of the Abortion right in general. However, the public is less united when it comes to the preferred way of handling the issue by the government. There are those who think that the limits and the funding should be in the hands of the States. No State can legally ban Abortion, but some States have shorter term limits than others. There are others who want the federal government to impose higher fixed minimal term limits to ensure that women's rights are not in danger. And then there are those who favor the complete removal of any restrictions on Abortion nationally.

Harrison Ford himself supports higher fixed minimal term limits, but he isn't seen as somebody who is very forceful on this issue. Some believe that this way the President tries to keep good relations with Republicans in the House and Senate. This may be needed to pass his less Progressive agenda, as Ford isn't in good graces with the Commonwealth Coalition. The Republican Party, for their part, mostly tries not to emphasize their positions on Abortion that much. Maybe for strategic reasons, maybe to keep unity in the Party, as the issue is quite controversial. It already divides the People's Liberal Party, as the position depends on the Faction, and the Party should determine how to approach this problem in the upcoming Midterms.

Former Vice President Ben Miller arguing that the Republican Party should not push on the Abortion issue

The biggest accomplishment of Harrison Ford's Second Term has got to be his measures to digitalize the government. Electronic passports and other documents have been an idea that the Nelsonian Coalition has advocated for for some time now. At the beginning of Ford's Second Term, the Digitalization of Bureaucracy Act passed through Congress with the President quickly signing it. As a result, the government was able to cut down on bureaucratic processes by reducing the amount of paperwork. More importantly, the Department of Development and Renewal introduced the app with a bunch of electronic documents, like passports and birth certificates, now being available to every citizen of the country. The app is called "Action" and Secretary of DDR Markus Breitschmid promises further development of Action with many more documents being added to the app soon.

The Act is very popular among Americans, but it is not without its critics. Most of the arguments stem from the people being afraid for their civil liberties. Some claim that the government shouldn't be trusted with dealing with such delicate information. Others are worried about the possibility of somebody hacking into their accounts and receiving all of their information. The government, for its part, reassures the users of the app that the security of the app is under control.

Senator Lisa Madigan of Illinois arguing for the Digitalization of Bureaucracy Act (she was a co-author of the bill)

With that being said, many argue that the digitalization of government should include the way it provides law enforcement. Law-and-order politicians argue that the police officers should have easy access to the information about the people suspected of a crime. This idea has a lot of opponents who claim that this would be a government overreach and that there is a potential for misusing such information. Even sharper criticism faces the idea of introducing systems of facial recognition in public spaces using AI. Public surveillance is generally unpopular in the country, and many argue that such a measure will bring the trust in the government to an all-time low.

President Ford, on his part, opposes these ideas, but he has made efforts to improve the conditions of law enforcement officers. The President increased funding for the office, providing more for communication and to improve the training of future officers. However, there are groups in Washington that think that Ford is either doing not enough or too much on the Crime Policy. Those who argue for more action on law enforcement point to the instability in the country due to the violence of the past 2 years as the reason why the President needs to take law and order more seriously. Those who argue that the President does too much generally argue that police brutality should be taken as a much more important issue. The later argument is probably the reason President Ford is in the process of introducing the bill that would require the police officers to have body cams all the time during their service.

Senator R. T. Rybak of Minnesota on the need of body cams on the police officers

The final issue that should be mentioned here is Education. Throughout the years, the issue of Education was seen as somewhat overlooked. Sure, President Ehlers makes efforts in improving the efficiency of Education, but some want major government initiatives to improve the quality of Education. President Ford proposed a bill that would mandate annual standardized testing as a way to answer the calls. However, this proved to be controversial as teachers' unions opposed it along with many Republicans. Because of the controversial nature of the proposal, the President decided to back off for now. Still, many people want more. Conservatives support less government involvement in Education, while Progressives want more; some even advocate for universally free college tuition.

Overall

Throughout his Second Term, Harrison Ford's Approval Ratings never got below 54% while having 67% during the first year of his Second Term. Most Americans think that the country is heading in the right direction, even if there are worries about various issues. Before the Midterms, President Ford's Approval Ratings are at 57%, and if he can keep this amount of optimism, the PLP will have good chances not only in 2014 but in 2016 as well.

https://preview.redd.it/6srttq5xckih1.png?width=612&format=png&auto=webp&s=d9e6376d5f0a5cf156dd07236bea7f7b1a657de8

HOW WOULD YOU RATE THIS PRESIDENCY SO FAR? VOTE!

In the times of crises, people need somebody who is capable to make them weather the storm. This is far from the easiest job in the world. Sometimes you will be recognized for your actions. And sometimes people just move on with a second thought. The Presidency of Daniel Inouye is seen as an afterthought by most people. It was short, it took place between two incredibly influential reigns of two very influential Presidents and it didn’t produce pretty much any legislation. However, should it be forgotten? We are here to answer this question.

The Official Presidential Portrait of Daniel Inouye

Administration:

• Vice President: Vacant (1992), David Pryor (1992-1993)
• Secretary of State: George McGovern
• Secretary of Defense: Rodney O'Gliasain Kennedy-Minott
• Secretary of the Treasury: Paul Davidson
• Attorney General: Morris Dees
• Postmaster General: Cardiss Collins
• Secretary of the Interior: Philip R. Sharp
• Secretary of Agriculture: Jim Hightower
• Secretary of Commerce: Sander Levin
• Secretary of Labor: Ed Garvey
• Secretary of Health and Human Services: José Ramón Machado Ventura
• Secretary of Education: Marian Wright Edelman
• Secretary of Energy: Amory Lovins
• Secretary of Housing and Urban Development: Andrew Young
• Secretary of Transportation: James Oberstar
• Secretary of Veterans Affairs: Harold Russell
• Ambassador to the Coalition of Nations (CoN): John Lewis
• Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency: Ralph Nader
• NASA Administrator: Robert A. Frosch
• FBI Director: John W. Dean III
• CIA Director: Richard Moose

Chapter I - The Twenty-Four Day Presidency

At 9:35 p.m. on December 26, 1992, President Tom Laughlin was pronounced dead following the Assassination that had shocked the nation only hours earlier. That same evening, Vice President Daniel K. Inouye took the oath of office, becoming the 39th President of the United States and the first Asian-American to hold the nation's highest office. Rather than inheriting a new administration, Inouye assumed responsibility for a government struggling to maintain order during one of the most uncertain moments in modern American history.

The country remained in mourning following Laughlin's death. Memorial services were held across the United States as millions of Americans paid tribute to the slain President. Political leaders from every major party condemned the Assassination and urged the public to reject violence and allow the constitutional process to continue. In his first national address, President Inouye honored his predecessor's legacy while calling for unity and restraint, declaring that no act of political terrorism would be allowed to undermine the American Republic or its democratic institutions.

The Administration's immediate priority was identifying those responsible for the Assassination. President Inouye ordered the creation of a joint federal task force composed of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Secret Service, and other federal law-enforcement agencies to coordinate the investigation. Their efforts quickly produced results. Within a day, authorities arrested Shinpei Yamaguchi Jr., a Japanese-American extremist with links to far-right organizations. His arrest reassured many Americans that the government had acted swiftly, yet it answered only one question, who had pulled the trigger.

Far more troubling questions remained unanswered. Investigators could not immediately determine whether Yamaguchi had acted alone, whether domestic extremist organizations had assisted him, or whether foreign interests had played any role in planning the Assassination. Speculation spread rapidly through newspapers, radio programs, and television broadcasts. Particular attention focused upon the possibility of Japanese involvement, though investigators repeatedly stated that no evidence supporting such claims had yet been discovered.

Conspiracy theories emerged almost immediately after Inouye assumed office. The most widespread alleged that the new President himself had orchestrated the Assassination in order to reach the White House. The accusations were rejected by the overwhelming majority of elected officials, journalists, and the public, who viewed them as baseless attempts to exploit a national tragedy. Nevertheless, several extremist organizations embraced the conspiracy, while Representative George Lincoln Rockwell repeatedly used it to attack the legitimacy of the new administration. His repeated insinuations contributed to an increasingly polarized political climate.

The spread of extremist rhetoric was accompanied by renewed violence across parts of the South. Encouraged by far-right organizations and convinced that the federal government had lost its legitimacy, armed groups attempted to seize several state capitol buildings. Clashes between demonstrators and local authorities left dozens injured and raised fears that the unrest which had followed Bleeding Georgia was entering a new phase.

President Inouye offered to deploy federal troops wherever state governments believed additional assistance was necessary to restore order. Despite the escalating violence, the Governors of the affected states declined the offer, insisting that local law enforcement and National Guard units remained capable of handling the disturbances. Respecting the constitutional limits of federal authority, Inouye accepted their decisions while directing federal agencies to provide intelligence, investigative support, and logistical assistance wherever requested.

Beyond restoring public order, the President also faced an urgent constitutional responsibility. With the Vice Presidency vacant following his accession to the Presidency, the line of Presidential succession had become incomplete at a time when political uncertainty remained exceptionally high. Seeking an experienced and widely respected public servant, Inouye Nominated former Arkansas Senator David Pryor to serve as Vice President. His Nomination received broad bipartisan support in Congress, and Pryor was confirmed before the end of the year, restoring stability to the executive branch before Congress assembled to determine the outcome of the disputed Presidential Election.

By early January 1993, President Inouye had succeeded in calming much of the immediate crisis. The assassin had been captured, the federal government continued to function, and the constitutional line of succession had been restored. Yet the nation remained deeply divided. The motives behind the Assassination were still unknown, conspiracy theories continued to circulate among political extremists, and the investigation showed no signs of reaching a final conclusion. At the same time, Congress prepared for the Contingent Presidential Election, one that would determine who would lead the United States after the expiration of Tom Laughlin's term. Until that decision was made, Inouye viewed his foremost responsibility as preserving stability, protecting the Constitution, and ensuring the peaceful continuation of American government.

Firefighters trying to put out the fire in Atlanta, Georgia, 1992

Chapter II - The Constitutional Transition

As January 1993 began, the immediate shock following President Tom Laughlin's Assassination had begun to subside and Congress turned its attention toward choosing the next President. Under the Constitution, the House of Representatives would elect the President from the leading Candidates in the Electoral College, while the Senate would separately choose the Vice President.

The weeks preceding the vote were dominated by intense negotiations between congressional leaders. Republicans entered the contingent election with a majority of state delegations in the House of Representatives, making Colin Powell the clear favorite to become the next President. Nevertheless, the outcome was not considered entirely certain. Some Arch-Conservative members became sympathetic to Representative George Lincoln Rockwell and his increasingly influential American Patriot Coalition. That would never be enough to make him President, but could have been enough to stall the process.

The People's Liberal Party publicly rallied behind President Inouye, arguing that his calm leadership during the national crisis demonstrated his ability to continue serving as President. Although few expected enough Republican-controlled delegations to support him, Party leaders hoped that bipartisan cooperation might produce an unexpected result.

When the House of Representatives assembled, however, the Republican majority largely remained united. While several Representatives declined to support their party's official nominee, Colin Powell nevertheless secured enough state delegations to be elected the next President of the United States. The result was accepted peacefully by both Major Parties, with President Inouye immediately congratulating Powell and pledging a smooth transfer of executive authority on January 20.

The Senate proved considerably less predictable. Under the Constitution, Senators met separately to Elect the next Vice President. Republicans nominated Charles Percy, Powell's Running Mate during the General Election, while the People's Liberals once again supported Daniel Inouye. Unlike the House, however, the Senate produced an unexpected bipartisan coalition. Four Republican Senators crossed Party lines to support Inouye, while four People's Liberal Senators voted against their party's Nominee. After the voting, Inouye secured a narrow majority, ensuring that he would return to the office of Vice President following the expiration of Laughlin's term.

The unusual outcome reflected the confidence many Senators had developed in Inouye during the weeks following the Assassination. Even legislators who disagreed with his political views frequently praised his restraint, professionalism, and commitment to preserving constitutional government throughout the crisis.

Throughout the remainder of his brief Presidency, Inouye continued supervising the federal investigation into Tom Laughlin's Assassination. Although investigators uncovered additional evidence concerning Shinpei Yamaguchi Jr. and his extremist connections, many of the central questions remained unanswered. Federal officials declined to speculate publicly regarding possible accomplices or foreign involvement, emphasizing that the investigation remained active and would continue under the incoming administration.

On January 20, 1993, Daniel Inouye peacefully transferred Presidential authority to Colin Powell, who was inaugurated as the 40th President of the United States. Moments later, Inouye took the oath of office once again, returning to the Vice Presidency after having served as President for twenty-four days, the shortest presidential tenure in American history.

Historians have generally regarded Daniel Inouye's Presidency as one defined not by legislation or sweeping policy initiatives, but by constitutional stewardship. Faced with Assassination, political violence, conspiracy theories, and an unresolved Presidential Election, his Administration maintained the continuity of government while preserving public confidence in the constitutional process. Although the full truth behind Tom Laughlin's Assassination would not emerge until the Powell Administration, Inouye's calm leadership during those turbulent weeks ensured that one of the gravest political crises in modern American history did not become a constitutional one.

Statue of Daniel Inouye at the Daniel K. Inouye International Airport (Honolulu)

View Poll

HOW WOULD YOU RATE THIS PRESIDENCY SO FAR? VOTE!

Actors in politics are nothing new. Some don't make any impact. Some build good careers in the area. And there are those who are special - those who reach the highest office in the land. Of course there is Harrison Ford, probably the most successful actor turned politician. However, he wasn't the first. Today we are going to talk about the actor-turned-politician. It is a man whose legacy is defined by his principles. This is a person who didn't give up and fought for what he believed. Many accused him of being too stubborn and idealistic for politics. But to his supporters, he is a soldier, put to rest in the battlefield. This is a story of Tom Laughlin.

The Official Presidential Portrait of Tom Laughlin

Administration:

• Vice President: Daniel Inouye
• Secretary of State: George McGovern
• Secretary of Defense: Rodney O'Gliasain Kennedy-Minott
• Secretary of the Treasury: Paul Davidson
• Attorney General: Morris Dees
• Postmaster General: Robert E. Allen (1989-1991), Cardiss Collins (1991-1992)
• Secretary of the Interior: Philip R. Sharp
• Secretary of Agriculture: Jim Hightower
• Secretary of Commerce: Sander Levin
• Secretary of Labor: Ed Garvey
• Secretary of Health and Human Services: José Ramón Machado Ventura
• Secretary of Education: Marian Wright Edelman
• Secretary of Energy: Amory Lovins
• Secretary of Housing and Urban Development: Andrew Young
• Secretary of Transportation: James J. Florio (1989-1991), James Oberstar (1991-1992)
• Secretary of Veterans Affairs: Harold Russell
• Ambassador to the Coalition of Nations (CoN): John Lewis
• Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency: Ralph Nader
• NASA Administrator: Robert A. Frosch
• FBI Director: John W. Dean III
• CIA Director: Richard Moose

Chapter I - A Different America

By the end of the Biden Administration, the United States remained one of the world's foremost economic and military powers. After eight years of Republican rule, the stage was set for one of the most competitive Presidential Elections in modern history.

The People's Liberal Party entered the 1988 Election seeking to prove that the Great Mergers had created a credible alternative to Republican dominance. Among the Party's leading figures was Tom Laughlin, the Governor of Wisconsin. Before entering politics, Laughlin had achieved national fame as an Actor, using his popularity to advocate for social justice, environmental protection, and anti-war causes. His transition into politics surprised many observers, but his energetic governorship quickly established him as one of the People's Liberals' most recognizable leaders.

Unlike many establishment politicians, Laughlin built his reputation through fiery rhetoric, unwavering idealism, and an uncompromising belief that government existed to serve ordinary citizens. As Governor, he championed expanded welfare programs, stronger labor protections, and environmental conservation.

To balance the ticket, the convention selected Senator Daniel Inouye of Hawaii as the Party's Nominee for Vice President. Inouye's reputation for bipartisanship, legislative experience, and distinguished military service reassured voters who questioned Laughlin's relative inexperience on international affairs.

The Republicans Nominated former Vice President Reubin Askew, presenting him as the natural successor to President Joseph R. Biden. Askew promised stability and continuity, arguing that Republican leadership had restored American prosperity and strengthened the country's standing abroad. He selected Governor of New Hampshire John H. Sununu as his Running Mate, hoping to unite both Moderates and Libertarians.

Throughout much of 1988, the nation closely followed the work of the Missing Individuals of Washington Investigative Committee (MIWIC), established to investigate Washington Governor Theodore Bundy and allegations surrounding his Administration's handling of the state's Public Safety Committee. Laughlin emerged as one of the committee's most outspoken members, earning widespread praise for his relentless questioning during nationally televised hearings. His performance strengthened his personal reputation as a principled reformer willing to confront corruption regardless of political consequences.

When Americans went to the polls in November, the Election became one of the closest in modern history. Despite the damage inflicted by the Bundy investigation, Tom Laughlin narrowly defeated Reubin Askew to become the first PEOPLE'S Liberal President of the United States. His victory reflected both public desire for domestic reform and the strength of his personal appeal as a Candidate who had openly confronted establishment.

The Election, however, offered no clear mandate. While the People's Liberals retained control of the House of Representatives, Republicans continued to hold the Senate, ensuring that the new President would face immediate legislative obstacles. The narrow result also revealed a country deeply divided over the direction of American politics following the Great Mergers.

Vice President Reubin Askew talking about his loss against Laughlin

Chapter II - A Progressive Agenda Meets Reality

Tom Laughlin entered office believing that the Election of 1988 had given the People's Liberal Party an opportunity to reshape American society. During his inaugural address, he promised to reduce inequality, strengthen environmental protections, and restore what he described as "the government's responsibility to its people." The enthusiasm surrounding his inauguration was considerable, but it quickly encountered the political realities of a divided Washington. While the People's Liberals controlled the House of Representatives, Republicans retained their majority in the Senate. Every significant piece of legislation would require negotiation, compromise, or confrontation.

Determined to fulfill his campaign promises, Laughlin introduced an ambitious Domestic Agenda during his first one hundred days in office. His Administration's first priority was repealing many of President Biden's tax reductions. Laughlin argued that the federal government could no longer afford Policies that favored the wealthy while social programs remained underfunded. The additional revenue, he insisted, would finance expanded welfare benefits, and improvements to public education.

The House approved much of the President's economic package, but the Republican-controlled Senate proved far less cooperative. Senate Republicans condemned the proposals as economically reckless, warning that higher taxes would discourage investment and threaten the prosperity achieved during the previous Administration. After weeks of heated debate, much of Laughlin's tax legislation stalled, forcing the White House to abandon several of its original objectives.

Vice President Daniel Inouye increasingly emerged as one of the Administration's most influential figures. Although he strongly supported the President's broader goals, Inouye repeatedly urged compromise with Moderate Republicans rather than prolonged legislative battles. His negotiations helped preserve portions of the Administration's program, but they also frustrated many Progressives, who believed the White House was already retreating from the promises made during the campaign.

Another early priority involved expanding the federal welfare system. Laughlin argued that economic growth during the previous decade had failed to benefit many working-class Americans and that government had an obligation to provide stronger assistance to struggling families. Conservative critics immediately attacked the proposal, claiming it would dramatically increase federal spending while encouraging long-term dependence on government assistance. Once again, the legislation became trapped in the Senate, leaving the President unable to deliver one of his signature campaign promises.

Trade Policy soon became another source of controversy. Seeking to protect American industry, Laughlin supported higher tariffs on selected foreign imports and questioned aspects of the Canada Economic Free Zone established before. The proposals proved deeply divisive. Organized labor welcomed measures intended to protect domestic manufacturing, while many economists warned that increased protectionism risked damaging North American trade. Canadian officials openly criticized the Administration's position, creating the first significant diplomatic disagreement between the two neighboring countries since the agreement's establishment.

Healthcare quickly emerged as perhaps the President's greatest domestic challenge. Laughlin sought to dismantle elements of the market-oriented reforms introduced under President Biden. Opponents immediately challenged the Administration's actions in federal court, arguing that several executive measures exceeded presidential authority. The resulting legal battles delayed implementation of key reforms and transformed Healthcare into one of the most contentious political issues of Laughlin's Presidency.

The rapid spread of HIV/AIDS presented another urgent test for the new Administration. Rejecting calls for limited federal involvement, Laughlin established a national AIDS Task Force charged with coordinating medical research, public education, and treatment programs. Public health organizations welcomed the Administration's willingness to address the epidemic directly, but Conservatives criticized what they considered excessive federal spending and objected to aspects of the proposed education campaigns. Although the Task Force demonstrated the Administration's commitment to confronting the crisis, disagreements over funding and implementation limited its immediate effectiveness.

Environmental Policy represented one of the few areas where Laughlin remained unwilling to compromise. Declaring climate change and pollution to be among the greatest long-term threats facing the nation, he proposed sweeping environmental legislation that included stricter industrial regulations and a federal carbon tax. Environmental organizations enthusiastically supported the initiative, while business leaders and Republican lawmakers denounced it as an unnecessary burden on economic growth. Much of the legislation stalled in Congress, reinforcing the growing perception that the Administration's ambitions consistently exceeded its ability to secure legislative victories.

Social Issues likewise produced intense political conflict. The Supreme Court's decision in Palmer v. Missouri reignited the national debate over Abortion, provoking demonstrations across the country from both supporters and opponents of abortion rights. Laughlin publicly defended abortion access while calling for legislation that would establish clearer federal protections, but Congress remained deeply divided. The controversy further intensified the ideological polarization that had begun during the Election campaign.

By the end of his first year in office, Tom Laughlin remained divisive. Admiration alone proved insufficient to overcome Washington's political realities. His ambitious domestic program had encountered relentless congressional resistance, upcoming economic uncertainty had only weakened public confidence, and several signature reforms remained tied up in legislative negotiations or legal challenges.

Prime Minister Flora MacDonald in an interview talking about Laughlin's tariffs

Chapter III - The New Space Race

Although President Tom Laughlin struggled to advance much of his Domestic Agenda through Congress, one area of government policy continued to enjoy overwhelming bipartisan support: the Space Race. Unlike many of his domestic initiatives, the nation's space program generated remarkably little partisan disagreement. Republicans praised it as evidence of American strength and innovation, while the People's Liberals viewed scientific investment as an essential responsibility of the federal government. Even lawmakers who fiercely opposed Laughlin's economic proposals generally supported continued funding for NASA.

The Administration's plans, however, were soon overshadowed by dramatic events abroad. The Japanese government invested enormous financial and technological resources into the mission to reach Mars, so to present it as proof that Japan had become the world's foremost scientific power. Newspapers around the globe portrayed the expedition as the next great chapter in the Space Race, comparing it to the American Moon landings decades earlier.

The mission ended in catastrophe. Mechanical failures during the expedition forced Japanese mission controllers to abort their landing attempt before the crew could safely reach the Martian surface.

The United States reacted with a mixture of sympathy and renewed determination. Laughlin publicly expressed condolences to the Japanese people and resisted calls from several members of Congress to exploit the disaster for political advantage. Instead, he praised the courage of the astronauts involved and argued that scientific progress inevitably required extraordinary risks. His measured response was widely welcomed internationally and helped prevent a deterioration in relations between Washington and Tokyo.

Encouraged by NASA Administrator Robert A. Frosch and supported by leaders from both political parties, Laughlin announced that the United States would begin preparations for its own manned expedition to Mars. Rather than rushing to capitalize on Japan's setback, the President insisted that America would proceed cautiously, placing scientific success and astronaut safety above symbolic victories. The Administration emphasized that every lesson learned from the Japanese failure would be incorporated into the American program before a launch date was even considered.

For Tom Laughlin, the Space Race became a rare source of political success during an otherwise frustrating Presidency. His Domestic Agenda remained stalled by partisan divisions, yet his careful handling of Japan's disaster and his commitment to expanding America's presence beyond Earth earned praise from supporters and critics alike. Even many Republicans acknowledged that the President had demonstrated restraint, maturity, and optimism at a moment when triumphalism could easily have damaged international relations.

By the close of 1989, Americans increasingly viewed the journey to Mars as the next great national project. Whether Laughlin would ultimately oversee that achievement remained uncertain, but few doubted that his administration had ensured that the United States remained firmly at the forefront of humanity's exploration of space.

Robert A. Frosch talking about the initiative

Chapter IV - Peace Through Détente?

If there was one area where President Tom Laughlin departed most dramatically from the Biden Administration, it was Foreign Policy. Laughlin believed the United States had become too willing to rely upon military power and unconditional support for allied governments. Instead, he argued that American influence should rest upon diplomacy, democratic reform, and a reduction of Cold War tensions. To supporters, it was a bold attempt to create a more peaceful world. To critics, it was naïve idealism that ignored geopolitical realities.

Nowhere would that doctrine be tested more severely than in Iran. When Laughlin entered office, the Imperial State of Iran remained one of America's closest allies in the Middle East. Despite years of brutal civil war, the strategic situation had improved considerably during the Biden Administration. Backed by American military and financial assistance, Imperial forces had gradually seized the initiative against a vast revolutionary coalition. By early 1989, many military observers believed that the Empire was likely to emerge victorious if American support continued.

President Laughlin, however, believed continued assistance could not remain unconditional. Reports alleging widespread war crimes by Imperial forces, combined with fundamental ideological differences between Washington and Tehran, convinced him that reform had to accompany continued American aid. The White House demanded that Iran organize democratic elections, prosecute those responsible for alleged war crimes, undertake constitutional reforms, and that Shah Reza Pahlavi abdicate in favor of his older sister, Princess Shahnaz Pahlavi, whom Laughlin viewed as a more Progressive constitutional figure. Iranian officials rejected every demand, dismissing the American threats as political posturing.

After months of unsuccessful negotiations, Laughlin followed through on his warning and suspended American military assistance. The President also believed that reducing American involvement in Iran would help cool tensions with the Empire of Japan, an objective that had become central to his broader policy of détente.

The consequences were immediate. Imperial forces, which had previously appeared to be winning the war, rapidly lost momentum. Offensive operations stalled, supply shortages emerged, and revolutionary forces regained the initiative. Alarm spread throughout Washington. Military leaders, congressional Republicans, and even Vice President Daniel Inouye urged the President to restore assistance before the situation became irreversible. Republicans accused Laughlin of handing Iran directly to Japan, while Chief of Staff and General Colin Powell, who had overseen much of America's military strategy during the conflict, warned that years of American policy were about to collapse. Laughlin refused to change course, insisting that abandoning his principles would only postpone Iran's underlying political problems. Powell resigned soon afterward, stating that he had lost faith in the President's judgment.

The Imperial State eventually collapsed, but the war did not end. The revolutionary coalition that had united against the Empire immediately turned upon itself. Democratic republicans, Islamists, fascists, nationalists, and numerous left-wing factions all fought for control of the country. Hoping to prevent an Islamist victory, the Laughlin Administration quietly worked to weaken the Islamist faction, believing that a moderate left-wing government would ultimately emerge victorious. Instead, the strategy backfired spectacularly. The Authoritarian Socialist faction systematically defeated its rivals and established a Communist government in Tehran.

Republicans mercilessly attacked the Administration, arguing that the first Social Democratic President in American history had presided over the Communist takeover of one of the nation's closest allies. Laughlin's Foreign-Policy approval ratings collapsed almost overnight. Ironically, Japan also failed to benefit from the Imperial collapse, as the new Communist regime proved hostile toward Tokyo as well as Washington. Nevertheless, the United States had unquestionably lost one of its most important partners in the Middle East.

Iran overshadowed every other aspect of the Administration's Foreign Policy, though it was far from the only initiative undertaken by the White House. Seeking to demonstrate American goodwill toward long-standing allies, Laughlin transferred several American-controlled port facilities in the Philippines back to Philippine sovereignty while maintaining the broader alliance between both nations.

Supporters praised the move as recognition of Philippine independence and equality. Critics argued that the ports possessed immense strategic value and had been surrendered without meaningful concessions. The decision also fueled a wave of conspiracy theories. Some claimed Laughlin was deliberately weakening the United States for Japan's benefit, while others absurdly accused Vice President Inouye of secretly serving Japanese interests simply because of his ancestry, even though Inouye had been among the strongest opponents of the Iran withdrawal inside the Administration.

Despite these controversies, Laughlin's policy of détente achieved several important successes. Relations between Washington and Tokyo improved noticeably during his first two years in office. In a historic diplomatic breakthrough, Laughlin became the first President of the United States to meet personally with the leader of the Empire of Japan. The summit, held in the Philippines, produced the Ragnarök Agreement, under which both powers agreed to reduce their stockpiles of Ragnarök Bombs and slow the accelerating nuclear arms race. Although neither nation abandoned its rivalry, many observers regarded the treaty as one of the most significant arms-control agreements since the beginning of the Cold War.

The Administration also strengthened relations with the State of India. Building upon cooperation established during the Biden Administration against insurgent activity originating from Afghanistan, Laughlin sought to draw India closer to the United States through expanded diplomatic and economic cooperation. Unlike Iran, India had recently begun implementing political and economic reforms, leading the President to believe that closer engagement could gradually encourage the country toward democratic government while reducing Japanese influence across South Asia. Although the results remained limited during his first term, the Policy was widely regarded as one of the more promising aspects of his foreign agenda.

For better or worse, Peace Through Détente became the defining Foreign-Policy doctrine of Tom Laughlin's Presidency. It reduced the risk of war between the world's greatest powers, yet it also produced one of the most controversial strategic decisions of the late twentieth century, a contradiction that would shape his historical legacy for decades to come.

Vice President Daniel Inouye being questioned about the fall of Iranian Imperial government

Chapter V - Stagnation and Bleeding Georgia

By the beginning of 1990, President Tom Laughlin found himself in an increasingly difficult political position. Much of the optimism surrounding his inauguration had faded as his Domestic Agenda remained stalled in Congress and the Economy began showing unmistakable signs of weakness. Although the United States avoided a recession, economic growth slowed considerably while inflation continued to climb. The Economy was in Stagnation while the Infation was in an overdive. Businesses delayed investment, consumer confidence declined, and unemployment gradually increased. Republicans argued that uncertainty surrounding the Administration's economic proposals had weakened the Economy, while the White House maintained that the slowdown represented the delayed consequences of Policies inherited from the Biden Administration.

Determined to reverse the trend, Laughlin proposed a large economic stimulus package centered on infrastructure projects, expanded public employment, and additional funding for education and scientific research. Supporters praised the proposal as a necessary investment designed to prevent a deeper economic downturn. Senate Republicans, however, condemned the plan as excessive government spending and blocked much of the legislation after weeks of contentious negotiations. Once again, the President's ambitious agenda collided with the realities of divided government.

The Administration soon suffered another significant setback when the Supreme Court issued its decision in Brands v. United States. The ruling struck down key elements of Laughlin's Healthcare reforms, arguing that portions of the Administration's implementation exceeded federal authority. The decision effectively restored major sections of President Biden's earlier Healthcare system while forcing the White House back to the negotiating table. For manyPprogressives, the ruling represented one of the greatest disappointments of Laughlin's Presidency, while Republicans celebrated it as a victory for constitutional restraint.

The political consequences became evident during the 1990 Midterm Elections. Republicans successfully portrayed the Elections as a referendum on the Administration's economic performance, warning that continued People's Liberal control of Congress would only deepen national uncertainty. While Laughlin campaigned extensively in support of People's Liberal Candidates, his appeals failed to reverse the growing dissatisfaction among Moderate and Independent voters. The People's Liberals suffered significant losses, strengthening Republican influence in Congress and leaving the President with even fewer opportunities to advance his legislative priorities during the remainder of his term.

Yet the most serious crisis facing the Administration emerged far from Washington. In Georgia, the election of William Luther Pierce as Governor dramatically altered the state's political landscape. Pierce's administration promoted an openly white supremacist agenda that sharply intensified political and racial tensions throughout the state. His rhetoric attracted passionate supporters but also provoked equally determined opposition from civil rights organizations, student groups, labor unions, and minority communities. Demonstrations soon became an almost daily occurrence in Atlanta and several other major cities.

As the months passed, isolated confrontations escalated into widespread civil unrest. Protesters accused the Georgia government of encouraging political extremism, while Pierce insisted that outside agitators were attempting to undermine the legitimate authority of the state government. Violent clashes between demonstrators, counter-protesters, and local law enforcement became increasingly common. National television networks broadcast scenes of burning buildings, street battles, and heavily armed police officers, creating the impression that Georgia was descending into chaos.

Faced with a rapidly deteriorating situation, President Laughlin authorized federal intervention in an effort to restore order. The deployment of federal forces proved deeply controversial. Supporters argued that the President had acted to prevent further bloodshed and uphold constitutional rights. Critics accused him of interfering in state affairs and further inflaming an already volatile political situation. Even within the People's Liberal Party, opinions remained sharply divided regarding the appropriate federal response.

The crisis reached its tragic climax when Governor Pierce was assassinated. The assassination shocked the nation. Although political leaders across the ideological spectrum immediately condemned the murder, the event triggered an unprecedented wave of violence throughout Georgia. Supporters of Pierce blamed the federal government, "Jews" and left-wing activists, while opponents feared widespread retaliation from extremist organizations. Rioting spread across Atlanta and several surrounding communities as law enforcement struggled to restore order. Newspapers soon began referring to the conflict as "Bleeding Georgia," a name that rapidly entered the national political vocabulary.

The unrest transformed the country's political climate almost overnight. Among those who benefited most from the crisis was Representative George Lincoln Rockwell, leader of the Republican Party's American Patriot Coalition. Rockwell argued that the violence demonstrated the complete failure of Laughlin's leadership and accused the Administration of allowing political extremism to flourish through weakness and indecision. His speeches attracted growing audiences across the country, particularly among voters who believed the federal government had lost control of public order.

International developments further compounded the Administration's difficulties. The Empire of Japan's invasion of Afghanistan stunned the international community and immediately challenged Laughlin's diplomatic strategy. Having built much of his foreign policy upon cooperation and détente, the President suddenly found himself confronting a major act of international aggression by one of America's principal partners. Critics argued that recent improvements in relations with Tokyo had failed to deter Japanese expansionism, while supporters maintained that continued diplomacy remained preferable to military confrontation. Regardless of the differing interpretations, the invasion undermined confidence in the Administration's broader Foreign-Policy vision.

Attorney General Morris Dees defending President's decision to send troops into Georgia

Chapter VI - The Election of 1992

By the beginning of 1992, the United States was preparing for one of the most intense Presidential Elections in its history. Four years earlier, Tom Laughlin had entered the White House promising to build "A Different America." His Presidency had undoubtedly changed the direction of national politics, yet many of his most ambitious domestic reforms had failed to become law. Economic Stagnation, congressional gridlock, the Iranian collapse, and the violence of Bleeding Georgia had steadily eroded public confidence. Although the President remained personally respected for his sincerity and idealism, many Americans questioned whether his Administration had possessed the practical leadership necessary to meet the challenges of the era.

Within the People's Liberal Party, that frustration produced an unusually competitive Presidential Primary. Several prominent figures believed the party required a different standard-bearer if it hoped to retain the White House. Among the most significant challengers were Senator John Glenn of Ohio, who argued that the Administration had failed to provide strong executive leadership, and Senator Lloyd Bentsen, who called for a more Moderate Economic platform capable of attracting Independent voters. Despite unexpectedly strong opposition, Laughlin secured Re-Nomination. The contentious primary, however, exposed divisions within the People's Liberal coalition that had remained largely hidden during the 1988 campaign. While party leaders ultimately united behind the President, the Nomination contest consumed valuable political capital that Republicans did not have to expend.

The Republican Party entered the Election from a position of growing confidence. Following Reubin Askew's defeat four years earlier, Republicans sought a Candidate capable of appealing both to the Party establishment and to voters dissatisfied with the Laughlin Administration. After a closely watched primary campaign, General Colin Powell secured the Republican Nomination. Having resigned during the Iran crisis in protest of Laughlin's Foreign Policy, Powell campaigned as a respected military leader whose judgment had been vindicated by subsequent events. Promising competent Administration, economic recovery, and renewed American strength abroad, he quickly united much of the Republican Party behind his Candidacy. Well, most of it...

To balance the ticket, Republicans selected Senator Charles Percy as their Nominee for Vice President, combining Powell's military reputation with Percy's extensive legislative and Foreign-Policy experience.

Yet neither Major Party fully controlled the national conversation. The continuing rise of Representative George Lincoln Rockwell transformed the Election into something unprecedented. Most would immediately understand that Rockwell didn't like Powell being Nominated and it wasn't a surprise of why. After all, this is a person who a straignt up Fascist and white supremacist. Rockwell launched an Independent Presidential campaign, after losing in the Republican Primary handily, built around the themes of "racial purety", "law and order", and opposition to both political Parties. His campaign drew heavily upon public anger following Bleeding Georgia, arguing that both Republicans and People's Liberals had failed to protect ordinary Americans.

Although many political commentators initially dismissed Rockwell's Candidacy as symbolic, his rallies attracted unexpectedly large crowds. By autumn, opinion polls suggested that Rockwell had become a genuine factor in the Election, threatening to divide the Conservative vote.

The General Election campaign reflected three fundamentally different visions for America's future. Laughlin defended his Presidency as the beginning of a long-term transformation that had been obstructed by congressional opposition rather than rejected by the American people. Powell argued that the nation required experienced, disciplined leadership capable of restoring economic growth and international credibility. Rockwell rejected both arguments entirely, insisting that the country's political establishment had become incapable of solving America's growing problems. He also added some other words about Powell, but we can't mention them here.

As Election Day approached, it looked like Powell would win. Economic concerns dominated public discussion, while Bleeding Georgia, the Afghanistan crisis, and continuing ideological polarization ensured that national security and public order remained equally important campaign issues.

When Americans finally cast their ballots in November, the result shocked the nation. President Tom Laughlin actually won the national popular vote by only the narrowest of margins over Colin Powell, while George Lincoln Rockwell a strong Independent Presidential performance. Rockwell's success, however, dramatically reshaped the Electoral College, denying both Major-Party Candidates the electoral majority. Laughlin had more, but not enough. For the first time since Rockefeller, no Presidential Candidate had secured enough Electoral Votes to win the Presidency outright.

The Election would instead be decided by the House of Representatives in a contingent election. Even before Congress could convene to perform its constitutional duty, however, tragedy struck the nation, changing American history forever.

Asian-Americans in Laughlin's campaign headquarters

Chapter VII - A Nation Without a President

The constitutional crisis created by the Election of 1992 left the United States facing one of the most uncertain moments in its modern history.

While congressional leaders prepared for the contingent election, President Tom Laughlin was still in the office, urging for his cause among his supporters and talking with the legislators. Nobody knew for sure who will be President after the end of Laughlin's term. The odds were on Powell's side, but crazy things already happened, so the bets wouldn't be safe.

In the end, Laughlin's fight was stopped prematurely. Before Congress could assemble to elect the next President, Tom Laughlin was Assassinated. News of his death spread across the country within minutes, bringing ordinary life to a standstill. Regardless of political affiliation, the Assassination shocked a nation already exhausted by years of increasing polarization. And to add to the chaos, nobody knew immediate details. The country was in chaos.

In accordance with the Constitution, Vice President Daniel Inouye was immediately sworn in as the 39th President of the United States. His first address to the nation called for restraint, national unity, and confidence in the constitutional order. Inouye pledged that the federal government would conduct a thorough investigation into the assassination while ensuring that the contingent election proceeded according to law.

The murder of a sitting President transformed the political atmosphere overnight. What had begun as a disputed Election became a national tragedy, with security heightened across the country amid fears of further political violence. The Assassination marked the culmination of several years of growing extremism, partisan hostility, and declining public trust that had increasingly characterized American politics for some time.

Historians have continued to debate Tom Laughlin's Presidency. His supporters remembered him as an idealist who sought to create a more compassionate America through expanded social programs, environmental protection, diplomacy, and scientific progress. They pointed to the continued success of the American space program, improved relations with several foreign powers, and the Ragnarök Agreement as lasting accomplishments achieved despite constant political opposition.

Critics offered a harsher assessment. They argued that many of Laughlin's domestic proposals proved politically unrealistic, that his Administration failed to overcome divided government, and that decisions such as the withdrawal of support from Iran contributed to significant international setbacks. Economic Stagnation, the crisis in Georgia, and growing political instability further damaged public confidence during his Presidency. What nobody could deny is that Tom Laughlin was a man who stood for his principles no matter what.

President Tom Laughlin with his wife and daughter

View Poll

The 2008 Election is here and this is what we have:

https://preview.redd.it/syduiche6gdh1.jpg?width=1220&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3ed8ccfd620c06efd91757909f8f3d2ec7312b69

"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

The Context: https://www.reddit.com/r/Presidentialpoll/comments/1uxge40/reconstructed\_america\_guardians\_of\_the\_stars\_the/

""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

Time to Vote! Decide who will win the Presidency of the United States!

View Poll

Harrison Ford has been President for 4 years. Now the country needs to evaluate his term and determine if there should be another one or if somebody else should guard the nation.

https://preview.redd.it/dr09fsca4gdh1.png?width=1046&format=png&auto=webp&s=a93de30e2d66d161f4bf81ada3af0125e47a65f6

The 2012 Presidential Election is a battle between two different people with two different views. One is a celebrity President who looks to complete his vision of America. The other one is the Populist who stands against what this President plans to do. It is President Harrison Ford taking on the Mayor of New York City, Curtis Sliwa, the man who was empowered by the backlash over Ford governance. Could Ford have created his own downfall? Time to find out!

"I am Fond of Ford!"

The People's Liberal Party's Presidential Nominee President of the United States of America Harrison Ford

Harrison Ford's victory against Elvis Presley in 2008 was one of the most one-sided Elections in American history. Such dominance should have presented Ford with an ability to do whatever he wants. After all, his Party gained a filibuster-proof majority in both Chambers of Congress. However, it wasn't that easy as far more left-wing members of the Party felt like they should be in power. This maybe caused a headache for Ford but didn't stop him. The President was able to work with what he had and pushed the agenda. Maybe not a full-on Fordism, but President Ford got stuff done by either working with his unruly Partymen or with the Republicans who were supportive of his agenda. And what an agenda he had.

During his and Ehlers's final year in the office, Japan reunified, the Mars base was being established, water on the planet was discovered, and Green energy overtook other forms of energy in the US. President Ford himself oversaw the rise of AI, the creation of the Department of Development and Renewal, the Economic Phoenix Act, the repeal of most of Ehlers's Healthcare Reforms, the legalization of same-sex marriage, the new State of Douglas becoming a thing, and overall Economic improvement. However, where there is success, there is a controversy, and Ford had a fair share of it. In terms of Policy, the stuff like his support of AI and the repeal of most of Ehlers's Healthcare Reforms was called out by his opponents. AI has its natural critics, and so the fact that Ford was pushing for it so hard rubbed some people the wrong way, while the promised Android powered by AI in 2 years doesn't seem to actually materialize in time. Republicans attacked Ford's repeal of Healthcare Reforms, but it was a divisive issue to begin with.

The biggest thing that could play against Harrison Ford in this Election is the fact that the Economy is not doing great. It has recovered from the lows of the Great Recession, but many people believe that it should do better. The Republicans are pointing fingers at Ford and his Administration, and they are not the only ones. The Progressives call Ford out for, in their eyes, prioritizing elites. He was even challenged for the People's Liberal Party's Nomination. However, if this Election turns out the same way, Ford doesn't have a lot to worry about. After all, many don't believe that after 16 years of Republican rule, the country wants to return the government to the GOP.

https://preview.redd.it/fg0lgopn4gdh1.png?width=1240&format=png&auto=webp&s=4a0ab56d586ef1cdd2ba231a8b96b1daca9b2097

"Kennedy? Townsend? Just Call her Vice President!"

The People's Liberal Party's Vice Presidential Nominee Vice President of the United States of America Kathleen Kennedy Townsend

Vice President Kathleen Kennedy Townsend was a key in President Harrison Ford keeping contact with a lot of Progressives in the Party. She always makes sure that even if there is some disagreement, it won't become a full-blown insurrection. The Vice President herself is more to the left of Ford and probably keeps him in check in some of his Economic agenda, but it is not confirmed. What is for sure is that Kennedy Townsend has been busy with her duties as the Vice President, and she doesn't seem to want to stop. The First Female Vice President works tirelessly to keep her and the President's jobs, be it in Congress or on the campaign trail.

"Let's Kick Him Out"

The Republican Party's Presidential Nominee the Mayor of New York City Curtis Sliwa

4 years ago Curtis Sliwa was pretty unknown nationally. People knew more about the organization he was a founder of - the Guardian Angels. However, now he stands as the man representing the Republican Party in this Election. How did this happen? Well, Sliwa, through and through, is a New Yorker who actually had a hand in New York's politics for some time now. With that being said, ironically, Ford becoming President gave him a break, and he was able to use the momentum to win the Mayor's race in 2009. This came as a huge shock, not that the Republican became Mayor but that somebody from the National Conservative Caucus. After that, Sliwa's movement just grew towards his way of securing the Republican Nomination for President.

The question arises - What is Sliwa's ideology? Where does he stand on the issues? What exactly does he not like about Ford? A short answer is, "It is all about Populism." Sliwa campaigns like he governs and governs like he campaigns. The Mayor of New York doesn't shy away from unorthodox approaches like showing up with his supporters to the meeting with the Assemblymen of the city. Or he could also conduct his own referendum on the Policy to show the support for it. Some call him "one of a kind," others call him "a clown." Still, you can't call Mayor Sliwa boring. He actually attracts many Protectionists to his side due to his opposition to Ford's support of the Free Market. In Socially Policy, Sliwa's rhetoric is more Conservative, decrying the power that the Supreme Court has after the legalization of same-sex marriage. However, the Mayor is careful enough to never call out the move directly. Foreign Policy is probably the only issue where he doesn't disagree with Ford all that much. That's probably why he doesn't emphasize his stances that much.

Does Curtis Sliwa actually have a chance of becoming President? Never say never, especially with a guy like the Mayor. But Sliwa has some disadvantages that won't make his path to the White House easy. He is still quite a controversial figure in politics right now. For some people, he is too eccentric in the period where the country may need steady leadership. It doesn't help that Ford is still relatively popular with all things said. Yes, some people worry that the Economy doesn't do good enough, but Mayor Sliwa will need to work like hell to prove that he is the person who can make the Economy great again. Maybe Sliwa's charm will do the trick. Or maybe the Republicans gambled too much.

https://preview.redd.it/w0k1hfy05gdh1.png?width=1103&format=png&auto=webp&s=dee5f641aeb0aa7bd1b7a17eb220b6f9e267a25a

"Sliwa's Nice, Neil it Twice"

The Republican Party's Vice Presidential Nominee Senator from Texas Neil Bush

The Bush family, what can you say about them? It is a famous dynasty that was started by former Senator and Presidential Nominee Prescott Bush, secured by the legendary Speaker of the House George H. W. Bush, and now another member of the family tries his luck. Neil Bush is a Senator from Texas and the son of former Speaker Bush. He became Senator after the tragic death of his brother, George W., pushed him into politics, winning his brother's seat. With all that being said, Neil Bush proved himself to be a capable and lovable Senator in his home state. Now he needs to do the same to the whole nation and present the ticket like a great alternative to the People's Liberal Party's ticket. Senator Bush for sure will help with Moderates while helping Sliwa in the South. There are some concerns that Bush and Sliwa are too different in terms of their personalities and Policies, but maybe they will make it work.

First Presidential Debate between Curtis Sliwa and Harrison Ford

To this day, there have been two Presidential debates and one Vice Presidential debate. By most accounts, Mayor Curtis Sliwa won the First Presidential Debate. It was interesting because Sliwa seems to constantly attack President Ford's Policy while regaining his smile. His attacks didn't come off as too aggressive to most people, as Sliwa often combined them with jokes, making people laugh, while Harrison Ford was visibly annoyed by the whole thing. President Ford, for his part, tried to not partake in the jokes and probably wanted to come off as the serious statesman. Instead, due to his irritation, the viewers thought he just looked like he wanted to be anywhere but there.

The Second Debate was a different story. This time President Ford came out on the attack, and Mayor Sliwa was serious. But it didn't work for Ford like it worked for Sliwa. Ford's attacks seemed to be more personal and a lot more aggressive. This hurt him in the eyes of the people, as he looked like he was more worried about settling the score than showing the people why he is the best person for the job. Sliwa, for his part, showed a different side of himself. He extensively talked about his record and his Policies. Most people agreed that Sliwa performed better in the First Debate, as he seemed more natural there, while in the Second Debate he looked less comfortable, especially during Ford's attacks. In one moment where Sliwa went on the offensive, he actually criticized Ford on Foreign Policy for not cooperating with Japanese authorities in their investigation to determine who launched the first nuke at the start of the collapse of the Empire of Japan. Overall, it was a closer, but still a win for Sliwa.

First Vice Presidential Debate between Neil Bush and Kathleen Kennedy Townsend

Would Vice President Kennedy Townsend help President Ford by winning her Vice Presidential Debate? Not really. Still, most agree that the debate was a tie. Although most thought that the current Vice President came off as more knowledgeable when it came to the Policy, she didn't look as well as Senator Bush during the debate. It seems like the Republicans adopted the strategy of annoying their opponents. Although Bush wasn't aggressive towards Kennedy Townsend, he constantly rubbed her the wrong way by asking her the same question all the time while she discussed the President's Policy - "Do you agree with it?" With how many saw Bush and Sliwa as too unlike, this was a nice way of turning the issue onto the People's Liberals. The Vice President looked genuinely irritated by all of this after an hour, but she powered through. Still, the debate was a tie.

As usual we have Third Parties and there are a lot.

First, the fusion ticket of the Ordinary American Party and the Prosperity Party. Ever since former Governor of Ohio Clancy Brown lost the race for the Republican Nomination, he was expected to run under these Parties' ticket. When Brown Announced that he was running, many thought that he could make an impact in the polls. However, the efforts to get on the ballot in all States failed, but he still has the biggest reach of any Third-Party ticket. His Running Mate is State Senator of New York Dean Skelos, who was a Republican before becoming a member of the Prosperity Party. Low profile of Skelos probably made people lose some confidence in Clancy's run.

Ordinary American and Prosperity Party's Presidential Nominee former Governor of Ohio Clancy Brown

Ordinary American and Prosperity Party's Vice Presidential Nominee State Senator Dean Skelos

Still, the biggest Third Party in the race is the Green Worker's Party. Its Nominee for President is another Candidate for the Nomination of the Major Party. This time it's former Governor of California Ron Dellums who came third in the People's Liberal Primary. There are rumors that Governor of Michigan Eric Mays was approached to become the Nominee, and he turned the proposal down, but it is not confirmed. Dellums's Running Mate is the previous Election's Vice President Nominee, Alexander Jones.

Green Worker's Party's Presidential Nominee former Governor of California Ron Dellums

Green Worker's Party's Vice Presidential Nominee Alexander Jones

We also have the regular Green Party. It has Nominated an Anthropologist/Anarchist and the former Vice Presidential Nominee David Graeber for President. Meanwhile, the Vice Presidential Nominee is Activist, Jared Ball.

Green Party's Presidential Nominee David Graeber

Green Party's Vice Presidential Nominee Jared Ball

Then there was the Pirate Party. It had its first fully digital Convention. By all accounts, it was a shitshow. The Presidential Nominee is former Gubernatorial Candidate from California, Cindy Cohn, while the Vice Presidential Nominee is Activist who is not even legally eligible for the position due to age, JP Hollembaek.

Pirate Party's Presidential Nominee Cindy Cohn

Pirate Party's Vice Presidential Nominee JP Hollembaek

Finally, we have the Patriot Party. It Nominated former Representative Chuck Baldwin for President and Activist Michael Hill for Vice President.

Patriot Party's Presidential Nominee former Representative Chuck Baldwin

Patriot Party's Vice Presidential Nominee Michael Hill

Still, there are only two Candidates who can realistically win the Presidency. Here is what it's all about:

https://preview.redd.it/syduiche6gdh1.jpg?width=1220&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3ed8ccfd620c06efd91757909f8f3d2ec7312b69

Will Harrison Ford become the first Liberal since Nelson Rockefeller to be Elected and Re-Elected, or will Curtis Sliwa stop Ford's rule? Find out soon!

The time has come. The Mayor of New York City Curtis Sliwa is about to make an important Announcement.

He's even not wearing his favorite hat

For some time now many people reported that he was ready to Announce who will be his Running Mate. It came down to two people.

#There are:

Neil Bush, Senator from Texas, Member of the American Solidarity, Socially Moderate, Economically Moderate, Moderately Interventionist, Education Reform Advocate, Community Investment Supporter

Senator Neil Bush of Texas is a popular politician with a good reputation and great name recognition. Although he ran in the American Solidarity's Primary and didn't do so well, he could become a key to success for Sliwa. The younger brother of the late George W. Bush, Neil can be a safe choice for the Mayor to be successful in the South while not scaring off the Moderates. His Economic views also align well with Sliwa's, and they would work fine as a team. However, Bush may be too safe considering the situation. With Bush, Sliwa might do well in the Election, but he might not bring attention for the Mayor to actually win. Who knows, maybe Senator Bush will surprise everyone and charm his way into Americans liking him just like Texans do.

Mia Love, Senator from Utah, Member of Libertarian League, Socially Conservative, Economically Libertarian, Moderately Interventionist, Mormon, Super Young

Senator from Utah Mia Love would be an ambitious choice. She is Super Young, clever, and generally likable. A member of the Libertarian League who has a lot of enthusiasm behind her, Love is seen as a rising star in the Party. Her Election as Senator was a surprise, and she isn't scared of sharing her mind either. If Elected Vice President, she would be the First African American Female and the First Mormon Vice President in history. This selection would bring a lot of attention. However, some think that Senator Love is too confrontational, and she can present some risks. With that being said, if Curtis Sliwa wants a bold pick for the Running Mate, Mia Love is it.

Finally, Sliwa gets to the point.

\"Let's get to your favorite part of these things. Most of, if not all, know that I should have finally made an important decision. Sorry for keeping you waiting... (A slight laugh can be heard) ... I thought long and hard on who should be the Republican Nominee for Vice President. I now know that is a person from the State not far from this one. This person made an impact in that State. Most importantly, this person has the skills and abilities to be the best as Vice President. So let me introduce you to my Running Mate - Senator...\"

View Poll

Curtis Sliwa is doing everything, going everywhere, and talking to everyone on his road to the Republican National Convention. An interview with Conservative news network here, a talking panel with Progressives, and just some regular public appearances here and there. And people know him more and more.

Mayor Curtis Sliwa attending a public event

However, Americans still don't know the Running Mate of the Mayor of New York City. Sliwa is yet to decide who he will rely on to be his number two. The Shortlist is becoming smaller by the day, though, and there are already 3 Finalists.

#3 final Candidates are:

Michael Powell, Governor of Virginia, Member of the Libertarian League, Son of former President, Socially Moderate, Economically Pro-Free Market, Moderately Interventionist, Education Reform Advocate

Here's how Sliwa could kill two birds with one stone. Michael Powell is a respectable member of the Libertarian League who is skeptical of Sliwa's Economic Policy, so picking a Libertarian as the Running Mate could ensure their support. However, Michael is also the son of former President Colin Powell, who is still influential in the National Union Caucus. So by choosing Michael Powell, Sliwa could make two Factions line up in support of him. After all, Michael was Elected Governor of Virginia at the same time as Sliwa. It would be poetic for them to beat Ford together.

Neil Bush, Senator from Texas, Member of the American Solidarity, Socially Moderate, Economically Moderate, Moderately Interventionist, Education Reform Advocate, Community Investment Supporter

Senator Neil Bush of Texas is a popular politician with a good reputation and great name recognition. Although he ran in the American Solidarity's Primary and didn't do so well, he could become a key to success for Sliwa. The younger brother of the late George W. Bush, Neil can be a safe choice for the Mayor to be successful in the South while not scaring off the Moderates. His Economic views also align well with Sliwa's, and they would work fine as a team. However, Bush may be too safe considering the situation. With Bush, Sliwa might do well in the Election, but he might not bring attention for the Mayor to actually win. Who knows, maybe Senator Bush will surprise everyone and charm his way into Americans liking him just like Texans do.

Mia Love, Senator from Utah, Member of Libertarian League, Socially Conservative, Economically Libertarian, Moderately Interventionist, Mormon, Super Young

Senator from Utah Mia Love would be an ambitious choice. She is Super Young, clever, and generally likable. A member of the Libertarian League who has a lot of enthusiasm behind her, Love is seen as a rising star in the Party. Her Election as Senator was a surprise, and she isn't scared of sharing her mind either. If Elected Vice President, she would be the First African American Female and the First Mormon Vice President in history. This selection would bring a lot of attention. However, some think that Senator Love is too confrontational, and she can present some risks. With that being said, if Curtis Sliwa wants a bold pick for the Running Mate, Mia Love is it.

View Poll

A lot of people expected some twists and turns in the Primary. However, it has never been in doubt who would win the Republican Nomination for President this year. Super Tuesday just cemented this. Although Governor of Pennsylvania Mark Roosevelt put up the best fight, even winning some states and staying on a little bit after that night, he wasn't able to stop the front runner.

The Results of the 2012 Republican Primaries

The Mayor of New York City, Curtis Sliwa, rose in part because of President Ford; now he is gonna challenge him. The National Conservative Caucus is fired up about finally getting its man as the Nominee, even if Sliwa is more nuanced than a lot of Conservatives would want to. Interesting that this happens just 4 years after the sacking of former Leader of the Faction Pat Buchanan, huh? Makes you wonder.

Still, Mayor Sliwa needs to work hard to win against the popular President. He himself is not universally beloved, so he might think of a way to climb this mountain. Maybe the selection of the right Vice Presidential Nominee will do it. Sliwa already has the Shortlist, so let's take a look.

Here is Curtis Sliwa's Vice Presidential Shortlist:

Neil Bush, Senator from Texas, Member of the American Solidarity, Socially Moderate, Economically Moderate, Moderately Interventionist, Education Reform Advocate, Community Investment Supporter

Senator Neil Bush of Texas is a popular politician with a good reputation and great name recognition. Although he ran in the American Solidarity's Primary and didn't do so well, he could become a key to success for Sliwa. The younger brother of the late George W. Bush, Neil can be a safe choice for the Mayor to be successful in the South while not scaring off the Moderates. His Economic views also align well with Sliwa's, and they would work fine as a team. However, Bush may be too safe considering the situation. With Bush, Sliwa might do well in the Election, but he might not bring attention for the Mayor to actually win. Who knows, maybe Senator Bush will surprise everyone and charm his way into Americans liking him just like Texans do.

Michael Powell, Governor of Virginia, Member of the Libertarian League, Son of former President, Socially Moderate, Economically Pro-Free Market, Moderately Interventionist, Education Reform Advocate

Here's how Sliwa could kill two birds with one stone. Michael Powell is a respectable member of the Libertarian League who is skeptical of Sliwa's Economic Policy, so picking a Libertarian as the Running Mate could ensure their support. However, Michael is also the son of former President Colin Powell, who is still influential in the National Union Caucus. So by choosing Michael Powell, Sliwa could make two Factions line up in support of him. After all, Michael was Elected Governor of Virginia at the same time as Sliwa. It would be poetic for them to beat Ford together.

Mitch Daniels, Senator from Indiana, Member of the National Union Caucus, Socially Moderate, Economically Conservative, Fiscal Reformer, Moderately Interventionist

Why would Curtis Sliwa choose Senator Mitch Daniels of Indiana as his Running Mate? Let's take a look at where Daniels is from - Indiana, the heart of the Steel Belt, where the Pro-Free Market Policies are generally unpopular. Sliwa with his Populist Economics and the Running Mate from the region could flip some, if not all, of the territory to his side. Also, Senator Daniels is a respected member of the National Union Caucus, and he would bring along others to vote for Sliwa. Maybe Daniels is not the most energizing pick, but he might be the most pragmatic.

Melissa Hart, Senator from Pennsylvania, former Representative, Leader of the American Dry League, Socially Conservative, Economically Moderately Conservative, Moderately Interventionist

Picking the Leader of the American Dry League would make the whole Faction loyal to Sliwa's campaign. However, the selection of Senator Melissa Hart of Pennsylvania could have other benefits. Like Daniels, she is from the Steel Belt, and choosing her could help in the region. Also, the ADL often has one of the most Conservative members of the Party, and so her selection could energize the base. Finally, Hart is, of course, a woman, and with Ford keeping Vice President Kennedy Townsend, stopping the bleeding from the female vote could help Sliwa with his coalition building. Sliwa might try this gamble.

Jon Bruning, Senator from Nebraska, Member of the American Solidarity, Socially Moderately Conservative, Economically Moderate, Moderately Interventionist, Rural Development Advocate, Young

Like Bush, Senator Jon Bruning of Nebraska would be a safe pick for the Running Mate. He will help Sliwa retain the vote in the Plains/Midwest while not upsetting the Moderates. However, Bruning is also Young and energetic. He might be of good use on the campaign trail. While not the most experienced, the choice of Bruning would be a respected one. With that being said, Bruning, like Bush, might be more of the defensive pick as he doesn't expand Sliwa to other States rather than those where Republicans should do well in general. Still, Sliwa might want to make sure to cover his bases.

Mia Love, Senator from Utah, Member of Libertarian League, Socially Conservative, Economically Libertarian, Moderately Interventionist, Mormon, Super Young

Senator from Utah Mia Love would be an ambitious choice. She is Super Young, clever, and generally likable. A member of the Libertarian League who has a lot of enthusiasm behind her, Love is seen as a rising star in the Party. Her Election as Senator was a surprise, and she isn't scared of sharing her mind either. If Elected Vice President, she would be the First African American Female and the First Mormon Vice President in history. This selection would bring a lot of attention. However, some think that Senator Love is too confrontational, and she can present some risks. With that being said, if Curtis Sliwa wants a bold pick for the Running Mate, Mia Love is it.

View Poll

We are just on the doorstep of Super Tuesday and a lot has happened. A lot of contests took place. The front runner and Mayor of New York City Curtis Sliwa won most of them. He was victorious in Cuba, Florida, Nevada, Colorado, Missouri, Wyoming and Michigan. However, Governor of Pennsylvania Mark Roosevelt was not that behind him with 1 less state than Sliwa under his belt. He won in Hawaii, Minnesota, Maine, Washington, South Carolina and Arizona. Roosevelt did better than expected, becoming the only Candidate who can truly challenge Sliwa. And then there was another Candidate who didn't win any states. Maybe to embarrass himself, he ended the campaign for the Republican Nomination. However, he may not be fully out. He is...

Former Governor of Ohio Clancy Brown after Withdrawing from the race and refusing to Endorse anybody. Some expect him to make a Third Party run

It is time for Super Tuesday. The Primary may not end immediately but whoever wins this night will probably win the Nomination.

So let's take a look at the final two Candidates:

"America Needs a Guardian"

Curtis ⁠Sliwa, Mayor of New York City, Member of the National Conservative Caucus, Socially Moderately Conservative, Economically Populist, Moderately Interventionist, Populist, Charismatic, Catholic, (He gets 2 Additional Points in the polls due to the Competition Contest result)

"Change for All Americans"

Mark Roosevelt, Governor of Pennsylvania, former Senator from Massachusetts, Official American Solidarity's Candidate, Socially Progressive, Economically Moderate, Internationalist, Reformer, Great-grandson and Grandnephew of former Presidents

Endorsements:

• American Solidarity and Senator from California Condoleezza Rice Endorse Governor of Pennsylvania Mark Roosevelt;
• National Conservative Caucus, Senator from Missouri John Ashcroft and the Governor of Louisiana Piyush Jindal Endorse the Mayor of New York City Curtis Sliwa

View Poll

Some people expected the New Hampshire Primary to produce a different result from the one in Iowa. Those people were wrong. In New Hampshire Mayor of New York City Curtis Sliwa won. He got 12 delegates to his name and a clear status as the front runner of the race. The Candidate in the second place was once again Governor of Pennsylvania Mark Roosevelt. He got 8 delegates. Many expected him to do better in the State that neighbors his former home state of Massachusetts but Sliwa is also from that region, so the result shouldn't shock anyone. Former Governor of Ohio Clancy Brown got 7 delegates, which is respectable showing from him. And finally there was another Candidate who had a bad showing. To add to that, this was a terrible showing in a State where he should have done better. There was no point of continuying this, so the decision was made. This Candidate is...

Former Senator from Texas Ron Paul Dropping out of the race and refusing to Endorse anybody

Whatever happens on the road to Super Tuesday may determine the result of the whole Primary. We will have to watch what happen.

So the Candidates left are:

"America Needs a Guardian"

Curtis ⁠Sliwa, Mayor of New York City, Member of the National Conservative Caucus, Socially Moderately Conservative, Economically Populist, Moderately Interventionist, Populist, Charismatic, Catholic, (He gets 2 Additional Points in the polls due to the Competition Contest result)

"Change for All Americans"

Mark Roosevelt, Governor of Pennsylvania, former Senator from Massachusetts, Official American Solidarity's Candidate, Socially Progressive, Economically Moderate, Internationalist, Reformer, Great-grandson and Grandnephew of former Presidents

"Are You Americans?"

Clancy Brown, former Governor of Ohio, Founder of Ordinary American Party, Backed by the Prosperity Party, Socially & Economically Moderate, Populist, Maverick

Endorsements:

• American Solidarity and Senator from California Condoleezza Rice Endorse Governor of Pennsylvania Mark Roosevelt;
• National Conservative Caucus, Senator from Missouri John Ashcroft and the Governor of Louisiana Piyush Jindal Endorse the Mayor of New York City Curtis Sliwa

View Poll

In Iowa the first contest of the Republican Presidential Primaries took place. The winner of the night was Mayor of New York City Curtis Sliwa with 24 delegates going to him. This was an expected result as he had led in the State for some time. In second was Governor of Pennsylvania Mark Roosevelt who got 16 delegates. This was a respectable showcase and he is considered the closest challenger to Sliwa's front-runner status. Former Governor of Ohio Clancy Brown was third with 10 delegates to his column. He is from the region, so he had some benefits on his side. Right on his toes was former Senator from Texas Ron Paul with 9 delegates. Not the best showing, but Libertarians are generally not expected to do well in the State. Finally, there was another Candidate who had a terrible night. Looking at the results, the outcome was not surprising for the campaign of said Candidate. It is...

Senator from California Condoleezza Rice Dropping out of the race and Endorsing Mark Roosevelt

Now the Candidates are looking at New Hampshire Primary, some to cement their status, others to survive.

So the Candidates now are:

"America Needs a Guardian"

Curtis ⁠Sliwa, Mayor of New York City, Member of the National Conservative Caucus, Socially Moderately Conservative, Economically Populist, Moderately Interventionist, Populist, Charismatic, Catholic, (He gets 2 Additional Points in the polls due to the Competition Contest result)

"Change for All Americans"

Mark Roosevelt, Governor of Pennsylvania, former Senator from Massachusetts, Official American Solidarity's Candidate, Socially Progressive, Economically Moderate, Internationalist, Reformer, Great-grandson and Grandnephew of former Presidents

"Are You Americans?"

Clancy Brown, former Governor of Ohio, Founder of Ordinary American Party, Backed by the Prosperity Party, Socially & Economically Moderate, Populist, Maverick

"rEvolution Can't Be Stopped"

Ron Paul, former Senator from Texas, Representative and Governor, Official Libertarian League's Candidate, Jeffersonian Libertarian, Socially Progressive, Isolationist, Really Old

Endorsements:

• American Solidarity and Senator from California Condoleezza Rice Endorse Governor of Pennsylvania Mark Roosevelt;
• Libertarian League Endorses former Senator from Texas Ron Paul;
• National Conservative Caucus, Senator from Missouri John Ashcroft and the Governor of Louisiana Piyush Jindal Endorse the Mayor of New York City Curtis Sliwa

View Poll

More Context:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Presidentialpoll/s/6hKcHoJC4k

Candidates:

"Like it? Vote Ford"

Harrison Ford, the current President of the United States of America, former Senator & Governor of Illinois, former Actor, Leader of the Nelsonian Coalition, Socially Progressive, Pro-Free Market, Supports Technoliberalism, Moderately Interventionist, Inventor of Fordism, Kinda Old

"He is Taking Care of Business"

Eric Mays, Governor of Michigan, Economically Really Progressive, Socially Progressive, Isolationist, Populist, Without filter

"Don't Sell Out People"

Ron Dellums, former Governor of California & Representative, Socially & Economically Really Progressive, Soft Interventionist, Really Old

Endorsements:

• Nelsonian Coalition, Third Way Coalition, Rational Liberal Caucus and National Progressive Caucus Endorse President of the United States Harrison Ford

View Poll

It is time for the Iowa Caucus. The race for the Republican Presidential Nomination becomes more condensed with two clear front runners and others looking for the opportunity to strike. There were debates, and they didn't change anything except for introducing the most recent entry. However, it didn't affect the positioning of the top two Candidates.

In the polls right now, Mayor of New York City Curtis Sliwa is leading by a decent margin. In the second place, not that far behind is Governor of Pennsylvania Mark Roosevelt, who looks for a way to surpass the Mayor. Far from them is former Senator from Texas Ron Paul, who has built a strong base but ought to expand it if he wants to have a real shot at the Nomination. Former Governor of Ohio Clancy Brown is on his toes in the polls, climbing from relative obscurity. Senator from California Condoleezza Rice saw somewhat of a drop in the polls, as in the eyes of people she doesn't present anything new. And finally there is a Candidate who is far behind everyone else. This Candidate sees the writing on the wall and decided to call it quits. He is...

Governor Piyush Jindal Withdrawing from the race and Endrosing Curtis Sliwa

There are now 5 Candidates left coming into Iowa. Some look for victory, some look for momentum, but what's for sure is that all want to make an impact.

So the Candidates coming into the Iowa Caucus are:

"America Needs a Guardian"

Curtis ⁠Sliwa, Mayor of New York City, Member of the National Conservative Caucus, Socially Moderately Conservative, Economically Populist, Moderately Interventionist, Populist, Charismatic, Catholic, (He gets 2 Additional Points in the polls due to the Competition Contest result)

"Change for All Americans"

Mark Roosevelt, Governor of Pennsylvania, former Senator from Massachusetts, Official American Solidarity's Candidate, Socially Progressive, Economically Moderate, Internationalist, Reformer, Great-grandson and Grandnephew of former Presidents

"rEvolution Can't Be Stopped"

Ron Paul, former Senator from Texas, Representative and Governor, Official Libertarian League's Candidate, Jeffersonian Libertarian, Socially Progressive, Isolationist, Really Old

"Are You Americans?"

Clancy Brown, former Governor of Ohio, Founder of Ordinary American Party, Backed by the Prosperity Party, Socially & Economically Moderate, Populist, Maverick

"Stability Abroad, Stability At Home"

Condoleezza Rice, Senator from California, Official National Union Caucus's Candidate, former Vice Presidential Nominee, Socially Moderate, Economically Moderate, Foreign Policy Expert, Strongly Interventionist, Hawkish

Endorsements:

• National Union Caucus Endorses Senator from California Condoleezza Rice;
• American Solidarity Endorses Governor of Pennsylvania Mark Roosevelt;
• Libertarian League Endorses former Senator from Texas Ron Paul;
• National Conservative Caucus, Senator from Missouri John Ashcroft and the Governor of Louisiana Piyush Jindal Endorse the Mayor of New York City Curtis Sliwa

View Poll