Offering: English —Seeking: Chinese

I need someone to help me out with mandarin learning materials (PDF) for intermediate learners. In case you wanna help please dm me.

reddit.com
u/TheGreat_OneI — 7 days ago
▲ 2 r/RealPhilosophy+2 crossposts

Existentialism: A Philosophical Examination of Human Freedom, Meaning, and Responsibility

Existentialism is one of the most influential philosophical movements of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. It focuses on the nature of human existence, emphasizing individual freedom, personal responsibility, authenticity, and the search for meaning in an often uncertain and indifferent world. Unlike philosophical traditions that seek objective or universal truths, existentialism argues that human beings create meaning through their choices and actions. The movement emerged as a response to rapid social, political, and intellectual changes, including industrialization, secularization, and the aftermath of the two World Wars. Existentialist philosophers contend that although human beings are free, this freedom is accompanied by anxiety and the burden of responsibility. This essay critically examines the philosophy of existentialism, its historical development, major themes, significance, criticisms, and continuing relevance in contemporary society.

Historical Background of Existentialism

Existentialism originated in nineteenth-century Europe, although it became a recognized philosophical movement during the twentieth century. The Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard is widely regarded as the founder of existentialist thought. Reacting against the abstract rationalism of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Kierkegaard argued that truth is fundamentally subjective and that individuals must make personal commitments despite uncertainty (Kierkegaard, 1843/1985).
Later, Friedrich Nietzsche expanded existential ideas by criticizing traditional morality and religion. His famous declaration that “God is dead” symbolized the decline of traditional religious authority in modern society and challenged individuals to create their own values (Nietzsche, 1882/1974).
During the twentieth century, Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, Simone de Beauvoir, and Albert Camus further developed existentialist philosophy. Although these thinkers differed in important respects, they shared a concern with human freedom, existence, authenticity, and the individual’s confrontation with meaninglessness.

Core Principles of Existentialism

Existence Precedes Essence

The principle that “existence precedes essence” is central to Sartre’s existentialism. According to Sartre (1946/2007), human beings are not born with a predetermined nature or purpose. Instead, individuals first exist and subsequently define themselves through their choices and actions. Unlike manufactured objects, whose purpose exists before they are created, human beings construct their identities over time.
This concept rejects determinism and emphasizes that every person is responsible for shaping his or her own character and destiny.

Freedom and Responsibility

Existentialists argue that freedom is an unavoidable feature of human existence. Sartre (1943/2003) maintained that individuals are “condemned to be free” because they must constantly make choices, even when choosing not to act. Freedom therefore carries responsibility, as individuals cannot shift blame for their decisions onto society, fate, or other people. Personal responsibility extends beyond private life because individual choices also influence others and contribute to the moral fabric of society.

Authenticity

Authenticity refers to living according to one’s genuine beliefs rather than merely conforming to social expectations. Heidegger (1927/1962) argued that many individuals live in an inauthentic manner by allowing public opinion and societal conventions to determine their identities.
Authentic living requires self-awareness, independent judgment, and the courage to make choices consistent with one’s own values despite external pressures.

Anxiety and Anguish

Existentialism views anxiety (or existential angst) as an inevitable consequence of freedom. Since individuals alone bear responsibility for their choices, they often experience uncertainty about whether they have chosen correctly. Rather than interpreting anxiety as psychological weakness, existentialists regard it as evidence that individuals recognize the seriousness of human freedom (Sartre, 1946/2007).

The Absurd

The concept of the absurd is most closely associated with Camus. In The Myth of Sisyphus, Camus (1942/1991) argued that human beings naturally seek meaning and order, yet the universe offers no objective answers. This conflict creates the absurd condition. Rather than surrendering to despair, Camus proposed that individuals should embrace life, continue striving, and create meaning through personal commitment and resilience.

Existentialism and Ethics

Existentialism differs from traditional ethical theories because it rejects predetermined moral laws as the sole basis for ethical conduct. Instead, existential ethics emphasize personal responsibility and authentic decision-making.

According to Sartre, every individual choice implicitly expresses a vision of what humanity ought to be. Consequently, existential freedom does not justify selfishness or moral relativism. Instead, it requires careful reflection, honesty, and accountability.

Simone de Beauvoir extended existential ethics by arguing that genuine freedom should promote the freedom of others. In The Ethics of Ambiguity (1947/1976), she maintained that ethical action requires recognizing both one’s own freedom and the freedom of fellow human beings.

Influence of Existentialism

Existentialism has profoundly influenced numerous disciplines.
In literature, existential themes appear prominently in the novels and plays of Sartre, Camus, and writers such as Franz Kafka, whose works explore alienation, identity, and the search for meaning.

In psychology, existential therapy developed through the work of thinkers such as Viktor Frankl and Rollo May. Their approaches emphasize personal responsibility, purpose, and resilience in the face of suffering.

In political philosophy, existentialism has contributed to debates concerning individual liberty, oppression, and social responsibility. The philosophy has also significantly shaped feminist theory, particularly through Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex, which argues that many social identities are historically constructed rather than biologically determined.

Criticisms of Existentialism

Despite its influence, existentialism has attracted considerable criticism.
First, critics argue that existentialism overemphasizes individual freedom while underestimating the influence of social structures, economic inequality, and cultural conditions on human behavior.
Second, religious philosophers contend that existentialism often dismisses objective moral values grounded in divine authority.

Third, some scholars criticize existentialism for encouraging pessimism because of its emphasis on anxiety, death, alienation, and meaninglessness.
Finally, critics suggest that the existential rejection of universal moral standards may lead to ethical subjectivism, making it difficult to resolve moral disagreements objectively.

Nevertheless, defenders argue that existentialism is not pessimistic but realistic. It acknowledges life’s difficulties while encouraging individuals to confront them courageously and construct meaningful lives through responsible action.

References
Beauvoir, S. de. (1976). The ethics of ambiguity (B. Frechtman, Trans.). Citadel Press. (Original work published 1947)
Camus, A. (1991). The myth of Sisyphus and other essays (J. O’Brien, Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published 1942)
Frankl, V. E. (2006). Man’s search for meaning. Beacon Press.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Blackwell. (Original work published 1927)
Kierkegaard, S. (1985). Fear and trembling (A. Hannay, Trans.). Penguin Classics. (Original work published 1843)
Nietzsche, F. (1974). The gay science (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published 1882)
Sartre, J.-P. (2003). Being and nothingness (H. E. Barnes, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1943)
Sartre, J.-P. (2007). Existentialism is a humanism (C. Macomber, Trans.). Yale University Press. (Original work delivered 1946)

reddit.com
u/TheGreat_OneI — 7 days ago

Offering: French, English Seeking: Chinese( Mandarin.)

I am looking for a committed native Chinese language partner who would be willing to have regular calls (video or audio)and chat, to improve my listening and speaking skills. I would be very okay if we could meet even once a week. Of course, the more the better. 

I I have quite a beginner level (HSK 1), but my interest is more on speaking the language rather than writing HSK exams for now.

I can offer French and English in return (I’m a native French from an Anglophone family) I’m equally reading a masters program in French in the US. I am currently a French Graduate instructor at the university.

reddit.com
u/TheGreat_OneI — 8 days ago
▲ 21 r/PhilosophyofReligion+2 crossposts

Voltaire and the “Religious Fanatism”. What he fought for is happening right now in the world.

Voltaire viewed religious fanatism as one of the greatest threats to human freedom, reason, and social peace. His critique was directed less at religion itself than at intolerance, dogmatism, and the use of religion to justify persecution and violence.
His views can be summarized in several key ideas;
Fanaticism destroys reason.
Voltaire believed that fanatics allow blind faith to replace critical thinking.
He argued that when people believe they possess absolute religious truth, they become willing to commit cruelty in its name.
Fanaticism leads to violence.
He pointed to events such as the St. Bartholomew’s Day massacre as evidence that religious extremism could produce mass murder and persecution.
In his view, history showed that intolerance often caused wars and suffering.
Tolerance is essential.
In Treatise on Tolerance, written after the wrongful execution of Jean Calas, Voltaire argued that people of different faiths should live peacefully together.
He maintained that governments should protect freedom of conscience rather than enforce religious conformity.

Religion should promote morality, not persecution.
Voltaire was a deist, believing in a creator but rejecting many doctrines and the authority of organized churches.
He thought religion should encourage ethical behavior instead of encouraging hatred toward those with different beliefs.
One of Voltaire’s most famous descriptions of fanaticism comes from Treatise on Tolerance:
“Fanaticism is to superstition what delirium is to fever.”
By this, he meant that superstition is already irrational, but fanaticism is an even more dangerous condition because it drives people to harmful action.

Voltaire’s criticism of religious fanaticism became a cornerstone of the Age of Enlightenment. His writings influenced later ideas about:
freedom of religion,
freedom of speech,
separation of religious authority from political power, and
the importance of tolerance in pluralistic societies.
In short, Voltaire argued that the greatest danger was not sincere religious belief but the certainty that one’s own religion justified oppressing or harming others. His remedy was reason, tolerance, and respect for freedom of conscience.

reddit.com
u/TheGreat_OneI — 9 days ago