https://avi-loeb.medium.com/we-should-not-mistake-cosmic-rays-for-ufos-8d10b0085b9c
Here's the latest article by professor Avi Loeb of the 3I/ATLAS fame. This time he casually dismisses a peer reviewed study and says it's a waste of time. Dr. Villarroel is already in the comment section refuting his claims.
I would like to point out one supposed argument that Avi Loeb uses in the article:
>Any UFOs in orbit around the Earth today would have been easily noticed by the surveillance apparatus of the U.S. intelligence agencies. Anomalous satellites would have been flagged as not belonging to the known fleet of satellites launched by the U.S. or other nations. Their existence would have raised a major alarm within the U.S. Intelligence agencies because of the suspicion about spy satellites potentially launched unnoticeably by adversarial nations.
>The Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, would have surely been aware of such an alarm and collect enough data to recognize non-human made satellites in orbit around Earth since the 1950s. As of now, there is no evidence for a major national security concern on that front.
I have questions.
Does Avi Loeb not understand how cover-ups work? Does he not understand that intelligence agencies have allegedly known the reality of the phenomenon for nearly a century?
Does Avi Loeb not understand that there is a "major national security concern" around UFOs? Has he watched Age of Disclosure?
What point is he making with Tulsi Gabbard? Are we supposed to assume that she's some honest broker who can't wait to share the truth with the public? Is there any evidence that she's trustworthy at all?
Source: https://edition.cnn.com/2026/05/08/science/video/pentagon-ufo-file-relase-lead-jake-tapper
Pretty good reporting by CNN here, other reporter is Tom Foreman.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mQ1kGk2A88
>In 1990, two men walking through the Scottish Highlands captured a photograph that would quietly become one of the UK’s most talked about (and least explained) UFO cases.
>The image showed a silent, diamond‑shaped object suspended in the sky. No one knows the identity of the two men who took the picture. The photo was sent to a national newspaper… and then, nothing.
>No article. No public follow‑up.
>For decades, the sighting existed only as a rumour - it was mentioned in UFO circles, whispered about online, referenced in documentaries - but with no image released, the case faded into near‑myth.
>30 years later a forgotten copy of the photograph resurfaced in the personal files of a retired official bringing the Calvine incident sharply back into focus and raising even more questions than before.
I just want to make this clear again because people seem to forget:
https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1f8qh1k/any_presidential_candidate_who_promises_to/?rdt=41169
The real UFO/NHI secrets are hidden under the ATOMIC ENERGY ACT, the presidents have no authority to disclose from that act, UAPDA is needed to untangle that mechanism, as outlined in the link above.
Trump is no exception to this rule, he already got his house raided a few years ago for unlawfully keeping documents classified under this act and he complied, he's not disclosing anything without the UAPDA passing. There is no circumventing this process, there's a reason they keep blocking this legislation.
None of the videos released are going to be definitive proof of NHI, the definitive videos will remain hidden. We are not getting any legitimate disclosure without Congress. So unless you hear Mike Johnson flipping his support for the UAPDA and the House republicans passing it instead of blocking it, nothing conclusive will be released.
I strongly suggest not buying into any hype otherwise.