Chicago VS indiana
I live in Chicago and work remotely. I don't own a car, and because of the ongoing monthly costs, I'd prefer not to have one if possible.
I'm considering buying a property in one of the following areas as an investment. My plan is to live in the home until I pay off the mortgage, and then buy a second property while renting out the first one.
Chicago
Indiana or Wisconsin, close to Chicago
I've heard that Chicago has many laws that are not very landlord-friendly.
On the other hand, Indiana and Wisconsin are generally considered more landlord-friendly. However, living there without a car would be very difficult, so I would likely need to buy or lease one. The monthly cost for a car, including the lease payment, insurance, and gas, would be around $700.
Both options have their pros and cons.
If you were in my situation, which option would you recommend, and why?