u/Top_Entertainer_760

I was convinced by Sam's arguments about determinism, but my friend's behavior is making me reconsider.

Sam makes a compelling case against free will.

We don't choose our genes. We don't choose our parents. We don't choose the society we're born into. Even our thoughts seem to arise in consciousness before we're aware of them. From that perspective, free will appears to be an illusion.

But I have a friend whose experience has made me question this conclusion.

He grew up in an obese family. His parents are obese. His siblings are obese. By his mid-20s, he was obese as well.

Then he decided to change.

He completely changed his diet, started exercising regularly, and eventually lost roughly 100 pounds.

I've talked to him extensively about the process. He still craves donuts almost every day, but he chooses to eat oatmeal instead. He still doesn't enjoy exercising, but he does it anyway.

The transformation hasn't been entirely positive, either. He's left with a significant amount of loose skin, which he's very self-conscious about. His decision to get healthy has also created tension within his family. They often explain their weight by pointing to genetics, slow metabolisms, or the idea that they're simply "naturally big." So his transformation has completely undermined those arguments and has created friction and frustration between him and his family.

He's overcoming social pressure, family norms, genetic predispositions, cravings, and his own desire to avoid exercise.

From the outside, it looks as though he's making dozens of deliberate choices every day that directly oppose his conditioning.

I understand that a determinist would probably ask, "What caused him to become the family member who changed?"

But that's exactly what I'm struggling with.

If a family shares the same environment, similar genetics, similar access to information, and similar habits, yet one persistently overrides those influences while the others don't, what exactly is the deterministic explanation?

What am I missing?

reddit.com
u/Top_Entertainer_760 — 5 days ago

I was convinced by Sam's arguments about determinism, but my friend's behavior is making me reconsider.

Sam makes a compelling case against free will.

We don't choose our genes. We don't choose our parents. We don't choose the society we're born into. Even our thoughts seem to arise in consciousness before we're aware of them. From that perspective, free will appears to be an illusion.

But I have a friend whose experience has made me question this conclusion.

He grew up in an obese family. His parents are obese. His siblings are obese. By his mid-20s, he was obese as well.

Then he decided to change.

He completely changed his diet, started exercising regularly, and eventually lost roughly 100 pounds.

I've talked to him extensively about the process. He still craves donuts almost every day, but he chooses to eat oatmeal instead. He still doesn't enjoy exercising, but he does it anyway.

The transformation hasn't been entirely positive, either. He's left with a significant amount of loose skin, which he's very self-conscious about. His decision to get healthy has also created tension within his family. They often explain their weight by pointing to genetics, slow metabolisms, or the idea that they're simply "naturally big." So his transformation has completely undermined those arguments and has created friction and frustration between him and his family.

He's overcoming social pressure, family norms, genetic predispositions, cravings, and his own desire to avoid exercise.

From the outside, it looks as though he's making dozens of deliberate choices every day that directly oppose his conditioning.

I understand that a determinist would probably ask, "What caused him to become the family member who changed?"

But that's exactly what I'm struggling with.

If a family shares the same environment, similar genetics, similar access to information, and similar habits, yet one persistently overrides those influences while the others don't, what exactly is the deterministic explanation?

What am I missing?

reddit.com
u/Top_Entertainer_760 — 5 days ago

How Washington Saved the Revolution in a Single Night

At the end of 1776, the American Revolution was on the brink of collapse.

The Continental Army had been driven out of New York, thousands of enlistments were about to expire, morale was shattered, and many believed independence was already lost.

Then George Washington made one of the boldest military gambles in history.

On Christmas night, he led 2,400 exhausted soldiers across the ice-choked Delaware River during a brutal winter storm. After marching through the freezing night, they launched a surprise attack at dawn against the Hessian garrison at Trenton.

The result was a stunning victory. More than 900 Hessian soldiers were captured, the Continental Army suffered only a handful of casualties, and the triumph reignited the Revolution. It restored morale, inspired reenlistments, and proved that bold strategy and surprise could overcome a stronger, better-trained enemy.

The iconic painting wasn't created until 1851, nearly 75 years later, by German-American artist Emanuel Leutze. It's filled with historical inaccuracies—Washington almost certainly wasn't standing in the boat, and the flag shown didn't exist yet—but that was never the point.

Leutze wasn't painting a photograph. He was painting an idea: the moment when courage, determination, and one extraordinary gamble helped save the American Revolution.

Sometimes, a painting tells a deeper truth than perfect historical accuracy ever could.

On a personal note, I just want to thank the United States for welcoming me and my family, who came here as refuges from a failing Soviet Union. I love this country. For me, it remains the shining beakon on a hill. A testament to the wisdom of the collective and the power of the individual. Happy birthday, America!

And happy 4th of July to all of you. May the US prosper for another 250 years, and beyond.

u/Top_Entertainer_760 — 2 months ago
▲ 122 r/USHistory

Apollo 11: An Achievement So Extraordinary That Millions Still Refuse to Believe It Happened

Despite overwhelming evidence—including photographs of the Apollo 11 landing sites taken decades later by Japanese, Indian, and Chinese lunar missions, telemetry tracked by observatories around the world, hundreds of thousands of pages of engineering documentation, hundreds of kilograms of lunar samples, and the simple fact that the Soviet Union—the United States' greatest rival in the Space Race—never challenged the authenticity of the landings—a surprising number of people still believe the Moon landing was faked.

That skepticism is itself a testament to the magnitude of the achievement.

Apollo was not merely another technological milestone. It was one of the most audacious undertakings in human history. In less than a decade, a constitutional democracy with a market economy marshaled the talents of more than 400,000 people, invented entirely new technologies, built the most powerful rocket ever flown, and sent human beings nearly 240,000 miles through space to land on another world—and brought them safely home.

The astronauts themselves displayed extraordinary discipline and composure, but they stood atop the work of an entire civilization of engineers, machinists, mathematicians, programmers, technicians, and test pilots. Apollo represented the combined industrial, scientific, and organizational power of the United States at its peak.

Ironically, Americans began arguing about the achievement almost as soon as it happened. Songs like "Whitey on the Moon" reflected a broader debate over whether the nation should have spent billions reaching another world while poverty and inequality persisted at home. Not long afterward, conspiracy theories emerged, fueled by sensational books and later television programs, despite the overwhelming body of evidence supporting the landings.

Yet the accomplishment endures.

Even if other nations establish permanent lunar bases or send larger expeditions in the decades ahead, they will still be building upon a frontier first crossed by Apollo. The United States didn't simply reach the Moon—it explored it. Americans drove the Lunar Roving Vehicle across its surface, conducted sophisticated geological fieldwork, deployed scientific experiments that operated for years, and yes, even hit golf balls into the lunar sky.

A thousand years from now, historians will still study Apollo as one of the defining achievements of human civilization. The conspiracy theories will survive only as an odd cultural footnote. The Moon landing itself will stand alongside the greatest accomplishments of history—a monument to what a free society, driven by ambition, ingenuity, and courage, proved was possible when it reached beyond the limits of the Earth.

u/Top_Entertainer_760 — 2 months ago
▲ 292 r/USHistory

Why the Battle of Khe Sanh Deserves to Be Considered One of America's Greatest Military Victories

Given what happened to the French at Battle of Dien Bien Phu in 1954, the successful defense of Battle of Khe Sanh was a remarkable military achievement. North Vietnam tried to repeat the formula that had destroyed the French fortress, but this time, the outcome was very different.

The siege was directed by Võ Nguyên Giáp, one of the most accomplished military commanders of the 20th century. His forces were battle-hardened, disciplined, and equipped with modern Soviet and Chinese weaponry, including AK-pattern rifles and powerful artillery such as the M-46 130 mm field gun.

For 77 days, they subjected Khe Sanh to relentless shelling and repeated attacks while attempting to isolate the base.

The Marines and other defenders—many experiencing their first major combat—held out under extraordinarily difficult conditions. Their defense was made possible by exceptional logistics, constant aerial resupply despite heavy enemy fire, overwhelming tactical air power, and one of the most sophisticated intelligence efforts of the war.

While the strategic significance of Khe Sanh remains debated, the tactical defense of the base stands as one of the U.S. military's most impressive defensive battles.

u/Top_Entertainer_760 — 2 months ago