u/Trauma-n-Design607

pulled three text-only logos from kittl’s template library — just type, no art. ran each through remix and got back fully art-directed identities: skate badge, vintage collage menu, fashion crest. minimal prompting, remix did the visual thinking.

logo, artistic, and typography are my favorite groups to pull from, but i went deeper than usual on this one and kept exploring past the first good result on each just to see the range.

rough token math: nine final remixes across three logos, but real count ran higher since i kept regenerating to explore. landing somewhere around 600 tokens for this one. i kept auto-model on the whole time for best quality, which is the move i’d recommend — but worth knowing it’ll sometimes reach for a pricier model behind the scenes, so it’s not a fixed cost per remix. fine if you’re watching loosely, worth checking if you’re tight on tokens.

if a text logo template is all you’ve got, that’s already a starting point.

here’s an overview of my workflow on the kittl canvas:
I wanted to see what remix would do with product packaging, so i ran a perfume bottle product shot through it with simple prompts. one version came back marbled and swirled — basically the same bottle, different universe.

then i took that remix and dropped it into the templated flow for a UGC video that i liked, which placed the product into three completely different “production line” scenes — conveyor belt, pass/fail scanner, laser inspection. i didn’t write detailed prompts for any of it, just a bit of direction. kittl built the scene around the asset i handed it.

the output:
each scene became its own short video. one product photo, three distinct UGC concepts, and the only creative direction i gave it was the original remix.

token transparency, because more people should see this before they start a project like it: this one ran me north of 2,000 tokens, most of a pro plan’s whole month in one sitting. some of that is on me.

i regenerated one of the videos just to test the bottle with the cap on versus off before landing on cap on — that kind of “let me see both” exploring adds up fast. the expense is personally worth it to me, i’d rather see the option than guess. but the same workflow runs a lot leaner if you commit to one direction instead of testing variations like i did.

the actual unlock wasn’t the bottle. it’s that remix found me a vessel and environment i never would’ve typed into a prompt box myself — it did the bulk of the creative lifting, i just pointed it at the product.

i would love to know how others are combining the features available on kittl to impact their own design flow! :)

started with a basic bold typographic streetwear logo from a template, then kept hitting remix styles — mixing logotype and typography — and watched the same word turn into graffiti, blackletter, a grungy hand-brushed mark, a rusted metal badge, and a little yellow doodle monster.

no prompting, no redrawing.

just one word-mark.

it’s basically a whole set you could split across a tee, a tag, a sticker, a story. you could choose one you like and keep generating a whole versatile set of logos that match for your brand. or play around and explore styles you like easily without typing a thing.

comment if you want the template link or remix style names!

One of my favorite Kittl workflows lately is taking one candle mockup and building multiple aesthetic directions around it using AI scenes, pattern overlays, lighting changes, and typography systems. Same product. Completely different emotional vibe.

A few swaps can turn:
• clean minimal luxury → soft editorial spa brand
• dark gothic botanical → moody apothecary drop
• playful retro → boutique gift shop energy

The wild part is you can keep the product consistent while testing entirely different audiences visually before committing to a full brand direction.

Prompt idea:

“Luxury candle campaign product photography, editorial studio lighting, realistic wax texture, styled lifestyle scene, layered shadows, premium packaging, aesthetic surface styling, cohesive brand palette, soft depth of field”

Then duplicate the layout and change only:
• pattern style
• props
• color grading
• typography pairing
• lighting mood

That’s where the magic happens honestly. One product becomes an entire campaign system instead of one lonely mockup fighting for its life 😭

We love to imagine every project starts with a beautiful moodboard, hours of inspiration gathering, carefully art-directed photos, and a perfectly curated creative process.

Real life doesn’t always work like that.

Sometimes you have a product that needs to go live this week.

For this project, I started with a single product photo and let Kittl do the heavy lifting.

Instead of generating one image at a time, I used AI to create an entire grid of campaign concepts in one shot. Hero images. Editorial shots. Detail crops. Lifestyle scenes. Flatlays. Close-ups. Movement shots.

From there, I simply reviewed the grid, picked the images that matched the direction I wanted, cut them out, upscaled the winners, and built out the final campaign assets.

The best part? I wasn’t staring at a blank canvas trying to decide what to make. I was choosing from possibilities that already existed.

Prompt used:

“Luxury fashion campaign featuring this oversized leather jacket as the hero product. Generate a variety of editorial images including hero shots, close-ups, lifestyle photography, movement shots, side profiles, flatlays, detail photography, campaign posters, and social media assets. Consistent styling, cohesive color palette, premium fashion photography, realistic lighting, luxury retail campaign aesthetic.”

Token count will vary depending on your model, prompt length, image references, and how many generations it takes before you find images you love. The final campaign shown here came from multiple generations, with only the strongest images making the final cut.

Sometimes the smartest workflow isn’t creating every image from scratch.

It’s letting AI generate 100 possibilities and choosing the 10 that inspire you.