
u/Unable_Mechanic_7159

[Project] A spectral engineering approach to the Riemann Hypothesis: I simulated a self-adjoint quantum potential up to X_max = 10^9 to recover the zeros with 10^-8 stability. Full text and dataset published on Zenodo
Hi everyone,
I wanted to share a project I’ve been independently working on for a while. As an engineer with a deep fascination for the interplay between physics and analytic number theory, I’ve always been drawn to the Hilbert-Pólya conjecture.
Instead of treating the problem through pure abstract deduction, I’ve approached it from a spectral engineering perspective. I built a parameter-free quantum confinement potential V(u) derived from the Riemann Explicit Formula, using the exact prime counting function π(x) regularized via a continuous Weierstrass-Gaussian transform.
The goal was to construct a self-adjoint Hamiltonian operator H whose discrete spectral signature maps directly onto the non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function (λₙ ~ γₙ).
💻 The Simulation & Deep Grid Scaling
I’ve recently pushed the numerical script to a deep-grid optimization ceiling of X_max = 1.0 × 10⁹, using a spatial grid resolution of N = 16,384 points.
Even under these high-dimensional space restrictions and hardware limitations (constrained to a 12.6 GB RAM desktop environment), the system has shown remarkable structural stability. The localized variance (Δ = λₙ - γₙ) completely lacks asymptotic drift or localized divergence, maintaining an invariant truncation error order of Δ ~ 10⁻⁷ to 10⁻⁸ across the entire processed spectral range.
Here is a quick look at the live tracking log from the sparse linear algebra solver (scipy.sparse.linalg.eigsh) recovering the resonance peaks:
=== Z-SUSY Explicit-Formula 1e9 PUSH (500 Zeros) ===
[+] Computing resonances (500 iterations, processing...) ...
[1/500] 14.134725 → 14.134725 (-0.00000029)
[11/500] 52.970321 → 52.970321 (-0.00000002)
[21/500] 79.337375 → 79.337375 (+0.00000001)
...
[151/500] 321.160134 → 321.160134 (-0.00000021)
[311/500] 557.564659 → 557.564659 (+0.00000018)
[321/500] 572.419984 → 572.419985 (+0.00000060)
🏛️ The Theoretical Backbone
The computational success isn't isolated. I have detailed the underlying continuous operators in a formal mathematical framework divided into three key stages:
Stage 1 (Asymptotic Confinement): Proving that the continuous potential diverges positively (lim_{u → ∞} V(u) = +∞), establishing an unbreachable confinement wall that guarantees a purely discrete spectrum.
Stage 2 (Strict Self-Adjointness): Utilizing the Kato-Rellich perturbation stability theorem and strict Dirichlet boundary conditions at the origin to ensure the spectrum remains strictly real.
Stage 3 (Spectral Duality): Mapping the roots via a regularized Weierstrass-Hadamard product determinant to tie them to the completed Riemann ξ-function.
I've also addressed the common "circularity / bootstrap challenge" in the text, outlining how subsequent stages will focus on completely decoupling the direct reliance on π(x) to achieve full arithmetic independence.
📦 Open Science & Data Availability
In the spirit of complete empirical transparency, I have published the open-access manuscript alongside the core optimized Python execution script and the high-precision research dataset.
Official DOI / Publication: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20933920
I would love to hear your thoughts, criticisms, or suggestions on the functional analysis side or the grid-scaling optimization. If anyone is working on similar spectral approaches to the Riemann Hypothesis, let's connect!
¿Serviría en Chile?
¿Creen que eliminando a las jefaturas mejoraría el rendimiento de las empresas en Chile?
Ruta Lo Orozco
Ayer llegando al tranque recreo en Quilpué...
Peleas en chat de la pega
¿Qué hacen ustedes cuando ven que está quedando la grande?
¿Le echan mas carbón o dejan que todo pase para opinar? 😅
PQC Oracle feedback request
Hi r/DeFi people!,
I’ve been working on solving the vulnerability of deterministic randomness and MEV front-running in L2 ecosystems. Most dApps rely on standard PRNG or classic VRF (like Chainlink), which works fine but isn’t resistant to post-quantum attack vectors or host-level memory injections.
To tackle this, I deployed a Post-Quantum Cryptographic (PQC) Oracle on Base that connects to a dedicated physical TRNG engine running on an AWS EC2 instance.
How the Anti-Tamper Security Works:
The core system monitors hardware metrics (temperatures, memory allocation anomalies). If the engine detects any external state-tampering or unauthorized memory injection attempts, it triggers an automated lockdown protocol that completely zeroes-out the volatile RAM before a memory dump can happen, isolating the oracle.
The Smart Contract Architecture:
It uses an asynchronous request-and-callback model via a Coordinator contract on Base.
I just open-sourced the client-side repository and the SDK to make it easy for other builders to test it out (ask me if you are interested).
I’d love to get your feedback on:
Questions:
- Is 0.0001 ETH a fair flat-fee for high-stakes DeFi protocols requiring physical quantum entropy?
- How would you handle the callback latency (~450ms) in fast-paced Web3 games or Worldcoin mini-apps?
Note: This is fully non-commercial right now, just sharing the architecture and looking for code/security feedback from fellow builders!