I own a 2025 Terra Hydro (Aluminum frame) and want to upgrade to the integrated handlebar. I found that the “Orbea Standard Stem ICR Headset Adapter” doesn’t support my bike. And I couldn’t find this adapter in the spare part page.
But I’m really confused because my headset spacer is oval as shown in the picture. So which exact part do I need to install my own handlebar?
HAOS 18.1
Core 2026.7.2
Matter Server 9.0.4
OpenThread Border Router 3.0.2
I cleared "Connected fabrics" before returning those light bulbs to IKEA. After 2 weeks, those ghost nodes showing as "External Router" are still in my thread network. How can I remove those without resetting everything?
I've noticed the KAJPLATS E26 1100 lm white spectrum bulb (latest firmware) has a very steep brightness change between 80% and 100%. I measured the actual brightness with the lux meter on my cellphone in a dark room. I managed to place my phone near the light bulb where the lux meter shows 1100 lux (so the number corresponds to lumen) at 100% brightness, and here's the result:
| Brightness bar (0) | Lux meter (lm) |
|---|---|
| 0 | 0 |
| 10 | 17 |
| 20 | 24 |
| 30 | 39 |
| 40 | 69 |
| 50 | 107 |
| 60 | 169 |
| 70 | 271 |
| 75 | 349 |
| 80 | 430 |
| 85 | 553 |
| 90 | 695 |
| 95 | 880 |
| 100 | 1100 |
The datapoints are more like an exp function rather than a power function, and are far away from gamma = 2.2 (what our eyes feel uniform)
I hope IKEA can fix the non-uniform brightness in the next firmware, ideally with a lookup table or some correction function.
This is a bug report for 406.114.90, KAJPLATS LED bulb E26 450 lumen, smart white spectrum/clear/globe with the latest firmware.
Home assistant + Adaptive lighting is OK to me. But Apple HomeKit Adaptive lighting will randomly turn on this light bulb in around 5-10 minutes, even if it’s off. I don’t have this problem with other KAJPLATS light bulbs.
This is happening on all three of my 406.114.90 light bulbs. And I’m 100% sure this is a firmware bug, not an individual problem. Hope IKEA developers can see this and fix it in the next version .
My previous apartment used Luxer One, and I was completely satisfied with it. I never had to wait for the staff to log my info because the Luxer One app let me unlock the package room at any time. Now I’ve moved to a place with Parcel Pending, where you can’t get in without a one-time code. And it feels like a nightmare that has just begun.
The entire system relies heavily on how responsible the delivery drivers are. USPS and UPS drivers always do their part and log our info, so we get the access code the second the package drops. FedEx drivers are hit-or-miss, but Amazon drivers? Never. They just dump the huge Amazon bins and take off.
This forces the management staff to manually enter the info for every single Amazon package by the end of the day just so we can get our codes. In the worst-case scenario, if a package arrives on Saturday, I’ll be locked out of the package room until Monday evening.
While Parcel Pending was advertised as a 24/7 convenience, it’s actually a "5-day-a-week, until 6 PM" hassle for tenants. Honestly, I’d rather spend a few extra bucks shopping in-store than sit around waiting for a stupid access code all weekend.
TL;DR: I audited the CPD public logs for the Cambridgepark Dr residential corridor in the Alewife area from April 2025 to April 2026. Data shows 22 bikes stolen, 15+ valuable package thefts, 14 vehicle break-ins, and 11 burglaries. Leasing offices are not providing incident alerts, leaving a significant gap between marketed security and reality.
The Alewife residential pocket — surrounded by the commuter rail and the wetland — is marketed as a premier, "secure" luxury residential hub. While it remains generally safe from violent crime, there is a concerning lack of transparency from the leasing offices regarding property-related incidents. Residents pay a premium for "fob-secured" safety, yet are often left in the dark when patterns of crime emerge.
After my bike was stolen from a "secured" bike room, I analyzed the Cambridge Police Department (CPD) public logs to see if this was an isolated event.
All six apartment complexes are located on Cambridgepark Dr. Here are the reported incident statistics for Cambridgepark Dr (April 2025 – April 2026):
Bike Theft (22 incidents): A majority occurred within "secure" bike rooms inside the apartment complexes. The primary vulnerability appears to be "tailgating" (unauthorized entry by following residents). Management has not addressed this recurring security flaw or warned residents of the specific risk to high-value bikes.
Package Theft (15+ incidents): The 15 documented cases likely represent a conservative estimate, as police logs frequently aggregate multiple individual package thefts into single incident reports. Despite this clear pattern of systemic vulnerability, the leasing office has yet to implement functional delivery protocols or issue formal safety alerts to residents regarding the heightened risk in common areas.
Vehicle Break-ins (14 incidents): The CPD logs typically list the location generally as "Cambridgepark Dr" without specifying whether the break-ins occurred in "secure" residential garages or on the street. While not leaving valuables in a vehicle is a universal rule, the lack of granular data - and management's refusal to clarify - prevents residents from knowing if their "secure" parking is actually being breached.
Burglary (11 incidents): This is the most critical security failure. Beyond the 11 documented unauthorized entries into residential units, two additional incidents involved the deliberate tampering or vandalism of key fob readers—indicating sustained efforts to bypass the building's electronic access controls. The absence of management alerts regarding these physical breaches of residential security is unacceptable.
The Accountability Gap: Renter’s Insurance is NOT a Security Strategy Whenever a security breach is reported, the leasing office’s default response is to deflect accountability by telling victims to simply "file a claim with your renter’s insurance." This is a classic case of passing the buck. Renter’s insurance is a safety net for personal property; it is not a substitute for functional building security. By treating insurance as a universal solution, management effectively washes their hands of any responsibility for the failure of the "secure" infrastructure we pay for. Residents are left to absorb the cost of deductibles and rising premiums, while the underlying security flaws remain unaddressed.
The Bottom Line: Transparency is a fundamental component of any functional security strategy. By not disclosing recurring patterns of property crime, management prevents residents from assessing their personal risk levels and implementing necessary precautions. An informed community is a more secure community; the current policy of silence works against that goal.
Source: You can verify these reported incidents by searching for "Cambridgepark" in CPD Daily Logs.
